PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSXU vs. DHSB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SSXU vs. DHSB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector International ETF (SSXU) and Day Hagan Smart Buffer ETF (DHSB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSXU achieves a 4.58% return, which is significantly higher than DHSB's 4.05% return.


SSXU

1D
-0.17%
1M
-0.13%
YTD
4.58%
6M
4.61%
1Y
19.79%
3Y*
12.76%
5Y*
10Y*

DHSB

1D
-0.31%
1M
0.45%
YTD
4.05%
6M
4.07%
1Y
9.51%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSXU vs. DHSB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SSXU and DHSB is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2025

0.62

The correlation between SSXU and DHSB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SSXU vs. DHSB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSXU
SSXU Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
SSXU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSXU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSXU Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
SSXU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSXU Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

DHSB
DHSB Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
DHSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DHSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
DHSB Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
DHSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
DHSB Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSXU vs. DHSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector International ETF (SSXU) and Day Hagan Smart Buffer ETF (DHSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SSXUDHSBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.36

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.86

2.88

-1.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.32

14.54

-8.22

SSXU vs. DHSB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSXU Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the DHSB Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSXU and DHSB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SSXU vs. DHSB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSXU drawdown since its inception was -13.91%, which is greater than DHSB's maximum drawdown of -7.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSXU and DHSB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SSXUDHSBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.91%

-7.65%

-6.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.71%

-3.32%

-7.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.96%

-0.66%

-3.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.23%

-0.87%

-2.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.14%

0.66%

+2.48%

Volatility

SSXU vs. DHSB - Volatility Comparison

Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector International ETF (SSXU) has a higher volatility of 4.20% compared to Day Hagan Smart Buffer ETF (DHSB) at 3.57%. This indicates that SSXU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DHSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SSXUDHSBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.20%

3.57%

+0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.86%

5.52%

+6.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.96%

6.07%

+7.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.40%

8.67%

+5.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.40%

8.67%

+5.73%

SSXU vs. DHSB - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSXU has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than DHSB's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

SSXU vs. DHSB - Dividend Comparison

SSXU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, more than DHSB's 1.20% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
DHSB
Day Hagan Smart Buffer ETF
1.20%1.25%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SSXU
Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector International ETF
2.54%2.66%2.74%2.07%0.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


SSXU and DHSB have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SSXU has higher volatility (4.20%) compared to DHSB (3.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSXU dropped -13.91% vs DHSB's -7.65%.

On 1-year performance, SSXU leads with 19.79% vs 9.51% for DHSB. On fees, DHSB is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, DHSB has been the lower-risk option at 3.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SSXU has performed better with a 19.79% return vs 9.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DHSB is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for SSXU.

SSXU has the higher dividend yield at 2.54%, compared with 1.20% for DHSB.

SSXU is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while DHSB is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for SSXU and 0.68% for DHSB.

DHSB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SSXU and DHSB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer