SSXU vs. HSCZ
SSXU (Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector International ETF) and HSCZ (iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SSXU is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Day Hagan, while HSCZ is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Small-Cap 100% Hedged to USD Index. SSXU is actively managed, while HSCZ is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SSXU returned 12.21%/yr vs 19.25%/yr for HSCZ. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SSXU charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for HSCZ.
Performance
SSXU vs. HSCZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSXU achieves a 3.06% return, which is significantly lower than HSCZ's 10.35% return.
SSXU
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- -1.58%
- YTD
- 3.06%
- 6M
- 2.66%
- 1Y
- 17.70%
- 3Y*
- 12.21%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HSCZ
- 1D
- -1.36%
- 1M
- -0.07%
- YTD
- 10.35%
- 6M
- 10.73%
- 1Y
- 27.70%
- 3Y*
- 19.25%
- 5Y*
- 11.06%
- 10Y*
- 12.54%
SSXU vs. HSCZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSXU Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector International ETF | 3.06% | 27.09% | 5.28% | 9.56% | 2.14% |
HSCZ iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF | 10.35% | 25.74% | 12.89% | 17.03% | 4.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSXU and HSCZ is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2022 | 0.79 |
The correlation between SSXU and HSCZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
SSXU vs. HSCZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SSXU
HSCZ
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
SSXU
HSCZ
Industrials
SSXU
HSCZ
Basic Materials
SSXU
HSCZ
Consumer Cyclical
SSXU
HSCZ
Healthcare
SSXU
HSCZ
Technology
SSXU
HSCZ
Consumer Defensive
SSXU
HSCZ
Energy
SSXU
HSCZ
Communication Services
SSXU
HSCZ
Utilities
SSXU
HSCZ
Real Estate
SSXU
HSCZ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSXU vs. HSCZ — Risk / Return Rank
SSXU
HSCZ
SSXU vs. HSCZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector International ETF (SSXU) and iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF (HSCZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SSXU | HSCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.44 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.66 | 2.90 | -1.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.62 | 12.32 | -6.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SSXU vs. HSCZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSXU drawdown since its inception was -13.91%, smaller than the maximum HSCZ drawdown of -34.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSXU and HSCZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSXU | HSCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.91% | -34.89% | +20.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.71% | -9.61% | -1.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.91% | -12.81% | -1.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.35% | -1.36% | -3.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.24% | -4.64% | +1.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.16% | 2.25% | +0.91% |
Volatility
SSXU vs. HSCZ - Volatility Comparison
Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector International ETF (SSXU) has a higher volatility of 4.43% compared to iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF (HSCZ) at 3.94%. This indicates that SSXU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HSCZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SSXU | HSCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.43% | 3.94% | +0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.95% | 9.76% | +2.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.01% | 11.64% | +2.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.41% | 13.52% | +0.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.41% | 15.47% | -1.06% |
SSXU vs. HSCZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSXU has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than HSCZ's 0.43% expense ratio.
Dividends
SSXU vs. HSCZ - Dividend Comparison
SSXU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, less than HSCZ's 2.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSCZ iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF | 2.95% | 3.25% | 3.26% | 2.98% | 26.91% | 2.90% | 1.46% | 4.66% | 6.15% | 2.52% | 2.57% | 1.75% |
SSXU Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector International ETF | 2.58% | 2.66% | 2.74% | 2.07% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SSXU and HSCZ have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SSXU has higher volatility (4.43%) compared to HSCZ (3.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSXU dropped -13.91% vs HSCZ's -34.89%.
On 3-year performance, HSCZ leads with 19.25% vs 12.21% for SSXU. On fees, HSCZ is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, HSCZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, HSCZ has performed better with a 19.25% return vs 12.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HSCZ is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for SSXU.
HSCZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.95%, compared with 2.58% for SSXU.
SSXU is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while HSCZ is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: Day Hagan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for SSXU and 0.43% for HSCZ.
HSCZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SSXU and HSCZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer