PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSXU vs. HSCZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SSXU vs. HSCZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector International ETF (SSXU) and iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF (HSCZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSXU achieves a 3.85% return, which is significantly lower than HSCZ's 11.38% return.


SSXU

1D
0.49%
1M
0.62%
6M
-0.99%
YTD
3.85%
1Y
16.44%
3Y*
11.59%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.39%

HSCZ

1D
0.04%
1M
-0.19%
6M
7.11%
YTD
11.38%
1Y
23.50%
3Y*
18.48%
5Y*
10.77%
10Y*
11.93%
ALL TIME*
10.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.59M$1.75M$1.29M
$118.06K$72.09K$330.31K

SSXU vs. HSCZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SSXU
Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector International ETF
3.85%27.09%5.28%9.56%2.14%
HSCZ
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF
11.38%25.74%12.89%17.03%4.08%

Correlation

The correlation between SSXU and HSCZ is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2022

0.79

The correlation between SSXU and HSCZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

SSXU vs. HSCZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SSXU
HSCZ

Financial Services

26.9%
12.7%

Industrials

16.8%
24.1%

Consumer Cyclical

8.6%
12.6%

Technology

8.3%
10.8%

Basic Materials

8.2%
9.8%

Consumer Defensive

6.5%
4.9%

Communication Services

6.1%
3.7%

Energy

5.3%
3.3%

Healthcare

5.2%
6.1%

Utilities

4.7%
2.1%

Real Estate

3.4%
10.0%

Financial Services

SSXU
26.9%
HSCZ
12.7%

Industrials

SSXU
16.8%
HSCZ
24.1%

Consumer Cyclical

SSXU
8.6%
HSCZ
12.6%

Technology

SSXU
8.3%
HSCZ
10.8%

Basic Materials

SSXU
8.2%
HSCZ
9.8%

Consumer Defensive

SSXU
6.5%
HSCZ
4.9%

Communication Services

SSXU
6.1%
HSCZ
3.7%

Energy

SSXU
5.3%
HSCZ
3.3%

Healthcare

SSXU
5.2%
HSCZ
6.1%

Utilities

SSXU
4.7%
HSCZ
2.1%

Real Estate

SSXU
3.4%
HSCZ
10.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SSXU vs. HSCZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SSXU
SSXU Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
SSXU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSXU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSXU Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
SSXU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSXU Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

HSCZ
HSCZ Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
HSCZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSCZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSCZ Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
HSCZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSCZ Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SSXU vs. HSCZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector International ETF (SSXU) and iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF (HSCZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SSXUHSCZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.36

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.54

2.46

-0.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.54

10.20

-5.67

SSXU vs. HSCZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSXU Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is lower than the HSCZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSXU and HSCZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SSXU vs. HSCZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSXU drawdown since its inception was -13.91%, smaller than the maximum HSCZ drawdown of -34.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSXU and HSCZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SSXUHSCZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.91%

-34.89%

+20.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.71%

-9.61%

-1.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.91%

-12.81%

-1.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.63%

-1.73%

-2.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.30%

-4.60%

+1.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.63%

2.31%

+1.32%

Volatility

SSXU vs. HSCZ - Volatility Comparison

Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector International ETF (SSXU) has a higher volatility of 5.49% compared to iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF (HSCZ) at 3.89%. This indicates that SSXU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HSCZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SSXUHSCZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.49%

3.89%

+1.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.60%

10.13%

+2.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.61%

11.98%

+2.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.47%

13.52%

+0.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.47%

15.35%

-0.88%

SSXU vs. HSCZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSXU has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than HSCZ's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

SSXU vs. HSCZ - Dividend Comparison

SSXU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%, less than HSCZ's 3.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HSCZ
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF
3.13%3.25%3.26%2.98%26.91%2.90%1.46%4.66%6.15%2.52%2.57%1.75%
SSXU
Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector International ETF
2.56%2.66%2.74%2.07%0.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SSXU and HSCZ have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SSXU has higher volatility (5.49%) compared to HSCZ (3.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSXU dropped -13.91% vs HSCZ's -34.89%.

On 3-year performance, HSCZ leads with 18.48% vs 11.59% for SSXU. On fees, HSCZ is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, HSCZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, HSCZ has performed better with a 18.48% return vs 11.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HSCZ is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for SSXU.

HSCZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.13%, compared with 2.56% for SSXU.

SSXU is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while HSCZ is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: Day Hagan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for SSXU and 0.43% for HSCZ.

HSCZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SSXU and HSCZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer