BAM vs. BN

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Brookfield Asset Management Inc. (BAM) and Brookfield Corp (BN).

Performance

BAM vs. BN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brookfield Asset Management Inc. (BAM) and Brookfield Corp (BN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BAM vs. BN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
BAM Brookfield Asset Management Inc.	-14.27%	-0.24%	39.70%	45.61%	-10.41%
BN Brookfield Corp	-11.65%	20.54%	44.18%	28.60%	-16.72%

Fundamentals

Market Cap BAM : $72.38B BN : $95.79B
EPS BAM : $1.53 BN : $0.55
PE Ratio BAM : 29.12 BN : 73.13
PS Ratio BAM : 14.77 BN : 1.26
PB Ratio BAM : 8.14 BN : 2.19
Total Revenue (TTM) BAM : $4.90B BN : $76.13B
Gross Profit (TTM) BAM : $4.64B BN : $29.53B
EBITDA (TTM) BAM : $3.04B BN : $32.77B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAM achieves a -14.27% return, which is significantly lower than BN's -11.65% return.

BAM

• 1D: 3.01%
• 1M: -4.92%
• YTD: -14.27%
• 6M: -20.45%
• 1Y: -5.09%
• 3Y*: 14.72%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BN

• 1D: 4.52%
• 1M: -7.52%
• YTD: -11.65%
• 6M: -11.21%
• 1Y: 16.52%
• 3Y*: 23.90%
• 5Y*: 12.06%
• 10Y*: 13.94%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

BAM vs. BN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAM

BAM Risk / Return Rank: 34
BAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
BAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
BAM Omega Ratio Rank: 30
BAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
BAM Martin Ratio Rank: 36

BN

BN Risk / Return Rank: 59
BN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
BN Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
BN Omega Ratio Rank: 54
BN Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
BN Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAM vs. BN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookfield Asset Management Inc. (BAM) and Brookfield Corp (BN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BAM	BN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.16	0.50	-0.65
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.00	0.89	-0.89
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	1.12	-0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.17	0.81	-0.98
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.38	2.40	-2.78
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BAM vs. BN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAM Sharpe Ratio is -0.16, which is lower than the BN Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAM and BN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BAM	BN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.16	0.50	-0.65
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.39	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.47	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.48	0.30	+0.18

Correlation

The correlation between BAM and BN is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

BAM vs. BN - Dividend Comparison

BAM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.08%, more than BN's 0.62% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BAM Brookfield Asset Management Inc.	4.08%	3.34%	2.80%	3.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
BN Brookfield Corp	0.62%	0.52%	0.56%	0.70%	1.44%	1.12%	1.55%	1.11%	1.56%	1.29%	1.58%	1.50%

Drawdowns

BAM vs. BN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAM drawdown since its inception was -30.37%, smaller than the maximum BN drawdown of -82.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAM and BN.

Drawdown Indicators

	BAM	BN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.37%	-82.22%	+51.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.37%	-22.05%	-8.32%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-41.85%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-51.42%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-27.80%	-17.55%	-10.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.02%	-28.61%	+20.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.59%	7.40%	+6.19%

Volatility

BAM vs. BN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brookfield Asset Management Inc. (BAM) is 7.36%, while Brookfield Corp (BN) has a volatility of 9.96%. This indicates that BAM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BAM	BN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.36%	9.96%	-2.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.37%	21.50%	+0.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.28%	33.43%	-1.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.23%	30.94%	-0.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.23%	30.06%	+0.17%

Financials