BAM vs. CSU.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Brookfield Asset Management Inc. (BAM) and Constellation Software Inc. (CSU.TO).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BAM or CSU.TO.
Key characteristics
| BAM | CSU.TO | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -1.88% | 12.10% |
| 1Y Return | 24.33% | 39.45% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.89 | 1.89 |
| Daily Std Dev | 26.93% | 21.95% |
| Max Drawdown | -20.47% | -25.95% |
| Current Drawdown | -8.44% | -4.42% |
Fundamentals
| BAM | CSU.TO | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $14.90B | CA$77.60B |
| EPS | $1.13 | CA$36.62 |
| PE Ratio | 33.91 | 99.99 |
| PEG Ratio | 4.84 | 2.04 |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.06B | CA$8.41B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $2.74B | CA$2.32B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $2.63B | CA$1.60B |
Correlation
The correlation between BAM and CSU.TO is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
BAM vs. CSU.TO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, BAM achieves a -1.88% return, which is significantly lower than CSU.TO's 12.10% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BAM vs. CSU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookfield Asset Management Inc. (BAM) and Constellation Software Inc. (CSU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BAM vs. CSU.TO - Dividend Comparison
BAM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.43%, more than CSU.TO's 0.11% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAM Brookfield Asset Management Inc. | 3.43% | 3.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CSU.TO Constellation Software Inc. | 0.11% | 0.12% | 0.19% | 0.25% | 2.84% | 31.30% | 7.53% | 8.63% | 10.78% | 19,020.03% | 19.05% | 29.24% |
Drawdowns
BAM vs. CSU.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BAM drawdown since its inception was -20.47%, smaller than the maximum CSU.TO drawdown of -25.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAM and CSU.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BAM vs. CSU.TO - Volatility Comparison
Brookfield Asset Management Inc. (BAM) and Constellation Software Inc. (CSU.TO) have volatilities of 6.92% and 6.69%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
BAM vs. CSU.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brookfield Asset Management Inc. and Constellation Software Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities