PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSUS vs. FTCS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SSUS vs. FTCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector ETF (SSUS) and First Trust Capital Strength ETF (FTCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSUS achieves a 14.61% return, which is significantly higher than FTCS's 0.01% return.


SSUS

1D
-0.79%
1M
7.35%
YTD
14.61%
6M
14.65%
1Y
29.88%
3Y*
18.55%
5Y*
11.91%
10Y*

FTCS

1D
-0.01%
1M
-0.79%
YTD
0.01%
6M
0.21%
1Y
2.29%
3Y*
9.49%
5Y*
5.40%
10Y*
10.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSUS vs. FTCS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SSUS
Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector ETF
14.61%16.47%18.86%18.19%-17.64%28.02%17.44%
FTCS
First Trust Capital Strength ETF
0.01%6.46%11.19%8.48%-10.22%26.75%9.96%

Correlation

The correlation between SSUS and FTCS is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2020

0.78

Over the past year, the correlation between SSUS and FTCS has dropped to 0.51 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

SSUS vs. FTCS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SSUS
FTCS

Technology

45.5%
12.3%

Communication Services

17.2%
2.3%

Consumer Cyclical

6.6%
7.7%

Industrials

6.5%
19.6%

Financial Services

5.5%
20.4%

Healthcare

4.4%
19.1%

Real Estate

3.8%

-

Utilities

3.7%

-

Energy

2.8%
2.2%

Consumer Defensive

2.4%
14.3%

Basic Materials

1.6%
2.1%

Technology

SSUS
45.5%
FTCS
12.3%

Communication Services

SSUS
17.2%
FTCS
2.3%

Consumer Cyclical

SSUS
6.6%
FTCS
7.7%

Industrials

SSUS
6.5%
FTCS
19.6%

Financial Services

SSUS
5.5%
FTCS
20.4%

Healthcare

SSUS
4.4%
FTCS
19.1%

Real Estate

SSUS
3.8%
FTCS

-

Utilities

SSUS
3.7%
FTCS

-

Energy

SSUS
2.8%
FTCS
2.2%

Consumer Defensive

SSUS
2.4%
FTCS
14.3%

Basic Materials

SSUS
1.6%
FTCS
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SSUS vs. FTCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSUS
SSUS Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
SSUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSUS Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
SSUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

FTCS
FTCS Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
FTCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTCS Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
FTCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTCS Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSUS vs. FTCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector ETF (SSUS) and First Trust Capital Strength ETF (FTCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SSUSFTCSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.46

0.23

+2.22

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.35

0.42

+2.93

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.05

+0.39

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.32

0.30

+3.02

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.41

0.73

+14.68

SSUS vs. FTCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is higher than the FTCS Sharpe Ratio of 0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSUS and FTCS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SSUSFTCSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.46

0.23

+2.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

0.41

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.50

+0.34

Drawdowns

SSUS vs. FTCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSUS drawdown since its inception was -23.75%, smaller than the maximum FTCS drawdown of -53.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSUS and FTCS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SSUSFTCSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.75%

-53.64%

+29.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.05%

-7.74%

-1.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.60%

-12.62%

-4.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.45%

-20.93%

-2.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.79%

-6.95%

+6.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.24%

-6.92%

+1.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

3.14%

-1.20%

Volatility

SSUS vs. FTCS - Volatility Comparison

Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector ETF (SSUS) has a higher volatility of 3.45% compared to First Trust Capital Strength ETF (FTCS) at 2.64%. This indicates that SSUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SSUSFTCSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.45%

2.64%

+0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.51%

6.99%

+2.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.23%

9.82%

+2.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.26%

13.13%

+2.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.86%

15.54%

+1.32%

SSUS vs. FTCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSUS has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than FTCS's 0.53% expense ratio.


Dividends

SSUS vs. FTCS - Dividend Comparison

SSUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, less than FTCS's 1.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTCS
First Trust Capital Strength ETF
1.12%1.04%1.33%1.47%1.23%1.06%0.93%1.26%1.26%1.15%1.43%1.50%
SSUS
Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector ETF
0.45%0.52%0.68%1.07%0.63%0.55%0.50%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SSUS and FTCS have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SSUS has higher volatility (3.45%) compared to FTCS (2.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSUS dropped -23.75% vs FTCS's -53.64%.

On 5-year performance, SSUS leads with 11.91% vs 5.40% for FTCS. On fees, FTCS is cheaper at 0.53% per year. On volatility, FTCS has been the lower-risk option at 2.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SSUS has performed better with a 11.91% return vs 5.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FTCS is cheaper with a 0.53% expense ratio, compared with 0.81% for SSUS.

FTCS has the higher dividend yield at 1.12%, compared with 0.45% for SSUS.

SSUS is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FTCS is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Donald L. Hagan LLC and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.81% for SSUS and 0.53% for FTCS.

SSUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SSUS and FTCS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer