PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTCS vs. FVD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTCS vs. FVD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Capital Strength ETF (FTCS) and First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTCS achieves a 0.03% return, which is significantly lower than FVD's 2.82% return. Over the past 10 years, FTCS has outperformed FVD with an annualized return of 10.16%, while FVD has yielded a comparatively lower 8.36% annualized return.


FTCS

1D
-0.50%
1M
-1.29%
YTD
0.03%
6M
0.88%
1Y
2.69%
3Y*
9.49%
5Y*
5.51%
10Y*
10.16%

FVD

1D
0.32%
1M
-1.28%
YTD
2.82%
6M
3.73%
1Y
8.01%
3Y*
8.47%
5Y*
5.40%
10Y*
8.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTCS vs. FVD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTCS
First Trust Capital Strength ETF
0.03%6.46%11.19%8.48%-10.22%26.75%13.05%26.71%-4.22%26.57%
FVD
First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund
2.82%8.16%10.04%4.11%-5.18%25.08%-0.02%26.58%-3.49%12.51%

Correlation

The correlation between FTCS and FVD is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2006

0.83

The correlation between FTCS and FVD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

FTCS vs. FVD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FTCS
FVD

Financial Services

20.4%
19.1%

Industrials

19.6%
14.2%

Healthcare

19.1%
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

14.3%
11.6%

Technology

12.3%
6.1%

Consumer Cyclical

7.7%
5.6%

Communication Services

2.3%
3.0%

Energy

2.2%
4.0%

Basic Materials

2.1%
2.1%

Real Estate

-

8.1%

Utilities

-

18.4%

Financial Services

FTCS
20.4%
FVD
19.1%

Industrials

FTCS
19.6%
FVD
14.2%

Healthcare

FTCS
19.1%
FVD
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

FTCS
14.3%
FVD
11.6%

Technology

FTCS
12.3%
FVD
6.1%

Consumer Cyclical

FTCS
7.7%
FVD
5.6%

Communication Services

FTCS
2.3%
FVD
3.0%

Energy

FTCS
2.2%
FVD
4.0%

Basic Materials

FTCS
2.1%
FVD
2.1%

Real Estate

FTCS

-

FVD
8.1%

Utilities

FTCS

-

FVD
18.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTCS vs. FVD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTCS
FTCS Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
FTCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTCS Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
FTCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTCS Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

FVD
FVD Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
FVD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FVD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
FVD Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
FVD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
FVD Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTCS vs. FVD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Capital Strength ETF (FTCS) and First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTCSFVDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.27

0.85

-0.57

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.47

1.29

-0.82

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.15

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.35

1.08

-0.73

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.87

2.97

-2.10

FTCS vs. FVD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTCS Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is lower than the FVD Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTCS and FVD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTCSFVDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

0.85

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.43

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.54

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.58

-0.08

Drawdowns

FTCS vs. FVD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTCS drawdown since its inception was -53.64%, which is greater than FVD's maximum drawdown of -51.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTCS and FVD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTCSFVDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.64%

-51.00%

-2.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.74%

-7.23%

-0.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.62%

-11.97%

-0.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.93%

-16.41%

-4.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.93%

-35.25%

+3.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.94%

-5.39%

-1.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.92%

-5.44%

-1.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.10%

2.63%

+0.47%

Volatility

FTCS vs. FVD - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Capital Strength ETF (FTCS) and First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD) have volatilities of 2.68% and 2.68%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTCSFVDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.68%

2.68%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.02%

6.75%

+0.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.82%

9.48%

+0.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.13%

12.76%

+0.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.54%

15.45%

+0.09%

FTCS vs. FVD - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTCS has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is lower than FVD's 0.61% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTCS vs. FVD - Dividend Comparison

FTCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, less than FVD's 2.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTCS
First Trust Capital Strength ETF
1.12%1.04%1.33%1.47%1.23%1.06%0.93%1.26%1.26%1.15%1.43%1.50%
FVD
First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund
2.30%2.36%2.23%2.34%2.20%1.75%2.31%2.03%2.50%2.10%2.04%2.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTCS and FVD have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FVD has higher volatility (2.68%) compared to FTCS (2.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTCS dropped -53.64% vs FVD's -51.00%.

On 10-year performance, FTCS leads with 10.16% vs 8.36% for FVD. On fees, FTCS is cheaper at 0.53% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FTCS has performed better with a 10.16% return vs 8.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FTCS is cheaper with a 0.53% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for FVD.

FVD has the higher dividend yield at 2.30%, compared with 1.12% for FTCS.

FTCS is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FVD is Mid Cap Value Equities. FTCS tracks The Capital Strength Index, while FVD tracks Value Line Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for FTCS and 0.61% for FVD.

FVD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.85 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTCS and FVD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer