FTCS vs. VIG
FTCS (First Trust Capital Strength ETF) and VIG (Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FTCS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the The Capital Strength Index, while VIG is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FTCS returned 10.41%/yr vs 13.40%/yr for VIG. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FTCS charges 0.53%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VIG.
Performance
FTCS vs. VIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTCS achieves a 0.55% return, which is significantly lower than VIG's 7.53% return. Over the past 10 years, FTCS has underperformed VIG with an annualized return of 10.41%, while VIG has yielded a comparatively higher 13.40% annualized return.
FTCS
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- -1.88%
- YTD
- 0.55%
- 6M
- -0.32%
- 1Y
- 5.44%
- 3Y*
- 9.28%
- 5Y*
- 5.80%
- 10Y*
- 10.41%
VIG
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 0.99%
- YTD
- 7.53%
- 6M
- 6.96%
- 1Y
- 20.27%
- 3Y*
- 16.05%
- 5Y*
- 11.07%
- 10Y*
- 13.40%
FTCS vs. VIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTCS First Trust Capital Strength ETF | 0.55% | 6.46% | 11.19% | 8.48% | -10.22% | 26.75% | 13.05% | 26.71% | -4.22% | 26.57% |
VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | 7.53% | 14.17% | 16.99% | 14.51% | -9.80% | 23.76% | 15.43% | 29.62% | -2.08% | 22.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTCS and VIG is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2006 | 0.88 |
The correlation between FTCS and VIG shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.91 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FTCS vs. VIG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FTCS
VIG
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
FTCS
VIG
Industrials
FTCS
VIG
Healthcare
FTCS
VIG
Consumer Defensive
FTCS
VIG
Technology
FTCS
VIG
Consumer Cyclical
FTCS
VIG
Communication Services
FTCS
VIG
Energy
FTCS
VIG
Basic Materials
FTCS
VIG
Real Estate
FTCS
-
VIG
-
Utilities
FTCS
-
VIG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTCS vs. VIG — Risk / Return Rank
FTCS
VIG
FTCS vs. VIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Capital Strength ETF (FTCS) and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FTCS | VIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.36 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.71 | 2.57 | -1.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.63 | 10.39 | -8.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FTCS vs. VIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTCS drawdown since its inception was -53.64%, which is greater than VIG's maximum drawdown of -46.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTCS and VIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTCS | VIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.64% | -46.81% | -6.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.74% | -7.91% | +0.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.62% | -14.95% | +2.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.93% | -20.39% | -0.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.93% | -31.72% | -0.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.45% | -0.62% | -5.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.92% | -5.50% | -1.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.34% | 1.96% | +1.38% |
Volatility
FTCS vs. VIG - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Capital Strength ETF (FTCS) has a higher volatility of 2.99% compared to Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) at 2.82%. This indicates that FTCS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTCS | VIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.99% | 2.82% | +0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.22% | 7.68% | -0.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.95% | 10.14% | -0.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.14% | 14.23% | -1.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.55% | 16.07% | -0.52% |
FTCS vs. VIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTCS has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than VIG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTCS vs. VIG - Dividend Comparison
FTCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, less than VIG's 1.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTCS First Trust Capital Strength ETF | 1.12% | 1.04% | 1.33% | 1.47% | 1.23% | 1.06% | 0.93% | 1.26% | 1.26% | 1.15% | 1.43% | 1.50% |
VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | 1.47% | 1.62% | 1.73% | 1.88% | 1.96% | 1.55% | 1.63% | 1.71% | 2.08% | 1.88% | 2.14% | 2.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTCS and VIG have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTCS has higher volatility (2.99%) compared to VIG (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTCS dropped -53.64% vs VIG's -46.81%.
On 10-year performance, VIG leads with 13.40% vs 10.41% for FTCS. On fees, VIG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VIG has been the lower-risk option at 2.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VIG has performed better with a 13.40% return vs 10.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VIG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for FTCS.
VIG has the higher dividend yield at 1.47%, compared with 1.12% for FTCS.
FTCS is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VIG is Dividend. FTCS tracks The Capital Strength Index, while VIG tracks S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for FTCS and 0.04% for VIG.
VIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FTCS and VIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer