PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSL vs. SCHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SSL vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sasol Limited (SSL) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SSL vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SSL
Sasol Limited
99.08%42.76%-53.51%-32.12%0.47%85.10%-59.00%-25.15%-12.02%22.69%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
-10.59%17.50%34.95%50.10%-31.80%28.11%39.14%36.02%-1.36%28.05%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSL achieves a 99.08% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's -10.59% return. Over the past 10 years, SSL has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of -5.74%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 16.83% annualized return.


SSL

1D
-1.14%
1M
45.29%
YTD
99.08%
6M
108.36%
1Y
206.38%
3Y*
0.16%
5Y*
-0.39%
10Y*
-5.74%

SCHG

1D
3.67%
1M
-5.12%
YTD
-10.59%
6M
-8.51%
1Y
16.81%
3Y*
21.91%
5Y*
12.55%
10Y*
16.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SSL vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSL
SSL Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
SSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSL Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
SSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSL Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSL vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sasol Limited (SSL) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SSLSCHGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.38

0.75

+2.63

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.57

1.23

+2.33

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.17

+0.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.64

1.03

+5.61

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

19.18

3.54

+15.64

SSL vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSL Sharpe Ratio is 3.38, which is higher than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSL and SCHG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SSLSCHGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.38

0.75

+2.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

0.57

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.09

0.79

-0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.79

-0.63

Correlation

The correlation between SSL and SCHG is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

SSL vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

SSL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SSL
Sasol Limited
0.00%0.00%2.27%9.25%5.55%0.00%0.00%1.97%3.36%2.15%2.98%4.38%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.43%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%

Drawdowns

SSL vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSL drawdown since its inception was -97.43%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSL and SCHG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SSLSCHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.43%

-34.59%

-62.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.18%

-16.41%

-15.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-87.96%

-34.59%

-53.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-96.53%

-34.59%

-61.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-71.65%

-13.34%

-58.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.12%

-5.22%

-27.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.15%

4.78%

+6.37%

Volatility

SSL vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

Sasol Limited (SSL) has a higher volatility of 12.49% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 6.67%. This indicates that SSL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SSLSCHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.49%

6.67%

+5.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.62%

12.51%

+29.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

61.48%

22.43%

+39.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.89%

22.32%

+28.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

61.00%

21.51%

+39.49%