SSL vs. AMZN
SSL (Sasol Limited) and AMZN (Amazon.com, Inc) are both stocks. SSL operates in Oil & Gas Integrated (Energy), while AMZN operates in Internet Retail (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, SSL returned -5.33%/yr vs 21.45%/yr for AMZN. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SSL vs. AMZN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSL achieves a 104.15% return, which is significantly higher than AMZN's 9.95% return. Over the past 10 years, SSL has underperformed AMZN with an annualized return of -5.33%, while AMZN has yielded a comparatively higher 21.45% annualized return.
SSL
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -7.00%
- YTD
- 104.15%
- 6M
- 116.45%
- 1Y
- 184.58%
- 3Y*
- 3.70%
- 5Y*
- -2.69%
- 10Y*
- -5.33%
AMZN
- 1D
- 1.51%
- 1M
- -7.22%
- YTD
- 9.95%
- 6M
- 10.77%
- 1Y
- 22.47%
- 3Y*
- 26.52%
- 5Y*
- 9.62%
- 10Y*
- 21.45%
SSL vs. AMZN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSL Sasol Limited | 104.15% | 42.76% | -53.51% | -32.12% | 0.47% | 85.10% | -59.00% | -25.15% | -12.02% | 22.69% |
AMZN Amazon.com, Inc | 9.95% | 5.21% | 44.39% | 80.88% | -49.62% | 2.38% | 76.26% | 23.03% | 28.43% | 55.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSL and AMZN is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 1997 | 0.22 |
The correlation between SSL and AMZN shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SSL:
$8.63B
AMZN:
$2.76T
SSL:
-$72.16
AMZN:
$8.37
SSL:
0.02
AMZN:
3.71
SSL:
0.06
AMZN:
6.24
SSL:
$504.51B
AMZN:
$742.78B
SSL:
$181.96B
AMZN:
$348.59B
SSL:
$93.25B
AMZN:
$152.71B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSL vs. AMZN — Risk / Return Rank
SSL
AMZN
SSL vs. AMZN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sasol Limited (SSL) and Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SSL | AMZN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.15 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.30 | 1.04 | +6.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.99 | 2.49 | +17.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SSL | AMZN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.14 | 0.75 | +2.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.05 | 0.27 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.09 | 0.66 | -0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.57 | -0.41 |
Drawdowns
SSL vs. AMZN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSL drawdown since its inception was -97.43%, roughly equal to the maximum AMZN drawdown of -94.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSL and AMZN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSL | AMZN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.43% | -94.40% | -3.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.45% | -21.74% | -3.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -78.96% | -30.88% | -48.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -87.96% | -56.15% | -31.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -96.53% | -56.15% | -40.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -70.93% | -7.71% | -63.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.28% | -28.12% | -5.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.28% | 9.03% | +0.25% |
Volatility
SSL vs. AMZN - Volatility Comparison
Sasol Limited (SSL) has a higher volatility of 13.69% compared to Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN) at 7.43%. This indicates that SSL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMZN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SSL | AMZN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.69% | 7.43% | +6.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.71% | 20.40% | +21.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.13% | 30.03% | +29.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.19% | 35.51% | +15.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.20% | 32.46% | +28.74% |
Dividends
SSL vs. AMZN - Dividend Comparison
Neither SSL nor AMZN has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZN Amazon.com, Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SSL Sasol Limited | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.27% | 9.25% | 5.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.97% | 3.36% | 2.15% | 2.98% | 4.38% |
Financials
SSL vs. AMZN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sasol Limited and Amazon.com, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SSL vs. AMZN - Profitability Comparison
SSL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sasol Limited reported a gross profit of 29.52B and revenue of 116.59B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.3%.
AMZN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amazon.com, Inc reported a gross profit of 66.77B and revenue of 181.52B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.
SSL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sasol Limited reported an operating income of 17.59B and revenue of 116.59B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.1%.
AMZN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amazon.com, Inc reported an operating income of 23.85B and revenue of 181.52B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.1%.
SSL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sasol Limited reported a net income of 229.58M and revenue of 116.59B, resulting in a net margin of 0.2%.
AMZN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amazon.com, Inc reported a net income of 30.26B and revenue of 181.52B, resulting in a net margin of 16.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SSL and AMZN have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SSL has higher volatility (13.69%) compared to AMZN (7.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSL dropped -97.43% vs AMZN's -94.40%.
SSL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.14 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SSL and AMZN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer