SSL vs. NVDA
SSL (Sasol Limited) and NVDA (NVIDIA Corporation) are both stocks. SSL operates in Oil & Gas Integrated (Energy), while NVDA operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past 10 years, SSL returned -6.01%/yr vs 68.65%/yr for NVDA. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SSL vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSL achieves a 73.43% return, which is significantly higher than NVDA's 12.01% return. Over the past 10 years, SSL has underperformed NVDA with an annualized return of -6.01%, while NVDA has yielded a comparatively higher 68.65% annualized return.
SSL
- 1D
- 4.83%
- 1M
- -15.49%
- YTD
- 73.43%
- 6M
- 85.08%
- 1Y
- 115.87%
- 3Y*
- -1.39%
- 5Y*
- -3.48%
- 10Y*
- -6.01%
NVDA
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- -2.99%
- YTD
- 12.01%
- 6M
- 13.73%
- 1Y
- 45.24%
- 3Y*
- 70.46%
- 5Y*
- 61.50%
- 10Y*
- 68.65%
SSL vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSL Sasol Limited | 73.43% | 42.76% | -53.51% | -32.12% | 0.47% | 85.10% | -59.00% | -25.15% | -12.02% | 22.69% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 12.01% | 38.92% | 171.25% | 239.02% | -50.26% | 125.48% | 122.30% | 76.94% | -30.82% | 81.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSL and NVDA is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 1999 | 0.24 |
The correlation between SSL and NVDA shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SSL:
$7.33B
NVDA:
$5.09T
SSL:
-ZAR 72.16
NVDA:
$6.53
SSL:
0.24
NVDA:
20.13
SSL:
0.80
NVDA:
26.04
SSL:
ZAR 504.51B
NVDA:
$253.49B
SSL:
ZAR 181.96B
NVDA:
$187.95B
SSL:
ZAR 93.25B
NVDA:
$192.76B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSL vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank
SSL
NVDA
SSL vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sasol Limited (SSL) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SSL | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.22 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.58 | 2.25 | +2.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.25 | 5.27 | +6.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SSL vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSL drawdown since its inception was -97.43%, which is greater than NVDA's maximum drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSL and NVDA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSL | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.43% | -89.72% | -7.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.45% | -20.21% | -5.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -78.96% | -36.88% | -42.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -87.96% | -66.34% | -21.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -96.53% | -66.34% | -30.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -75.31% | -11.39% | -63.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.32% | -36.16% | +2.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.57% | 8.61% | +0.96% |
Volatility
SSL vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison
Sasol Limited (SSL) has a higher volatility of 17.73% compared to NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) at 12.78%. This indicates that SSL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SSL | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.73% | 12.78% | +4.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.04% | 26.61% | +17.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.22% | 35.31% | +23.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.39% | 51.80% | -0.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.24% | 49.89% | +11.35% |
Dividends
SSL vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison
SSL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 0.13% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.11% | 0.05% | 0.12% | 0.27% | 0.46% | 0.29% | 0.45% | 1.20% |
SSL Sasol Limited | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.27% | 9.25% | 5.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.97% | 3.36% | 2.15% | 2.98% | 4.38% |
Financials
SSL vs. NVDA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sasol Limited and NVIDIA Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SSL vs. NVDA - Profitability Comparison
SSL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sasol Limited reported a gross profit of 29.52B and revenue of 116.59B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.3%.
NVDA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a gross profit of 61.16B and revenue of 81.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.9%.
SSL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sasol Limited reported an operating income of 17.59B and revenue of 116.59B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.1%.
NVDA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported an operating income of 53.54B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 65.6%.
SSL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sasol Limited reported a net income of 229.58M and revenue of 116.59B, resulting in a net margin of 0.2%.
NVDA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a net income of 58.32B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in a net margin of 71.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SSL and NVDA have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SSL has higher volatility (17.73%) compared to NVDA (12.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSL dropped -97.43% vs NVDA's -89.72%.
SSL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SSL and NVDA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer