SSD vs. BCC
SSD (Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.) and BCC (Boise Cascade Company) are both stocks. SSD operates in Building Products & Equipment (Industrials), while BCC operates in Lumber & Wood Production (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, SSD returned 19.29%/yr vs 17.60%/yr for BCC. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
SSD vs. BCC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSD achieves a 23.23% return, which is significantly higher than BCC's -0.86% return. Over the past 10 years, SSD has outperformed BCC with an annualized return of 19.29%, while BCC has yielded a comparatively lower 17.60% annualized return.
SSD
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- 7.17%
- YTD
- 23.23%
- 6M
- 18.84%
- 1Y
- 29.85%
- 3Y*
- 15.23%
- 5Y*
- 13.36%
- 10Y*
- 19.29%
BCC
- 1D
- -2.84%
- 1M
- 8.35%
- YTD
- -0.86%
- 6M
- -1.70%
- 1Y
- -15.13%
- 3Y*
- 0.31%
- 5Y*
- 11.37%
- 10Y*
- 17.60%
SSD vs. BCC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSD Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. | 23.23% | -1.95% | -15.74% | 125.36% | -35.62% | 50.20% | 17.51% | 50.84% | -4.39% | 33.54% |
BCC Boise Cascade Company | -0.86% | -37.47% | -4.02% | 106.65% | 1.53% | 62.14% | 37.01% | 59.08% | -38.36% | 77.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSD and BCC is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2013 | 0.58 |
The correlation between SSD and BCC shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (all time) to 0.70 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SSD:
$8.20B
BCC:
$2.61B
SSD:
$8.54
BCC:
$2.98
SSD:
23.22
BCC:
24.38
SSD:
3.47
BCC:
0.42
SSD:
3.35
BCC:
1.30
SSD:
$2.38B
BCC:
$6.37B
SSD:
$1.08B
BCC:
$709.89M
SSD:
$568.76M
BCC:
$308.65M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSD vs. BCC — Risk / Return Rank
SSD
BCC
SSD vs. BCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. (SSD) and Boise Cascade Company (BCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SSD | BCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 0.96 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.47 | -0.51 | +1.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.73 | -0.86 | +3.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SSD vs. BCC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSD drawdown since its inception was -68.16%, roughly equal to the maximum BCC drawdown of -67.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSD and BCC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSD | BCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.16% | -67.67% | -0.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.38% | -29.60% | +9.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.40% | -56.47% | +22.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.50% | -56.47% | +11.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.50% | -56.47% | +11.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.31% | -51.61% | +45.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.36% | -23.12% | +6.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.97% | 17.58% | -6.61% |
Volatility
SSD vs. BCC - Volatility Comparison
Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. (SSD) and Boise Cascade Company (BCC) have volatilities of 8.91% and 9.17%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SSD | BCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.91% | 9.17% | -0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.53% | 27.25% | -5.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.50% | 38.34% | -7.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.41% | 40.86% | -9.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.31% | 41.73% | -9.42% |
Dividends
SSD vs. BCC - Dividend Comparison
SSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, less than BCC's 1.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCC Boise Cascade Company | 1.21% | 1.17% | 4.90% | 6.73% | 5.84% | 7.61% | 4.18% | 3.75% | 5.45% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SSD Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. | 0.59% | 0.71% | 0.66% | 0.54% | 1.15% | 0.69% | 0.74% | 1.41% | 1.59% | 1.36% | 1.55% | 1.76% |
Financials
SSD vs. BCC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. and Boise Cascade Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SSD vs. BCC - Profitability Comparison
SSD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. reported a gross profit of 265.89M and revenue of 587.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.2%.
BCC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Boise Cascade Company reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.50B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
SSD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. reported an operating income of 114.62M and revenue of 587.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 19.5%.
BCC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Boise Cascade Company reported an operating income of 27.79M and revenue of 1.50B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.9%.
SSD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. reported a net income of 88.22M and revenue of 587.96M, resulting in a net margin of 15.0%.
BCC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Boise Cascade Company reported a net income of 17.84M and revenue of 1.50B, resulting in a net margin of 1.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SSD and BCC have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BCC has higher volatility (9.17%) compared to SSD (8.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSD dropped -68.16% vs BCC's -67.67%.
SSD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.99 vs -0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SSD and BCC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer