BCC vs. MLI
BCC (Boise Cascade Company) and MLI (Mueller Industries, Inc.) are both stocks. BCC operates in Lumber & Wood Production (Basic Materials), while MLI operates in Metal Fabrication (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, BCC returned 17.60%/yr vs 27.18%/yr for MLI. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
BCC vs. MLI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCC achieves a -0.86% return, which is significantly lower than MLI's 22.23% return. Over the past 10 years, BCC has underperformed MLI with an annualized return of 17.60%, while MLI has yielded a comparatively higher 27.18% annualized return.
BCC
- 1D
- -2.84%
- 1M
- 8.35%
- YTD
- -0.86%
- 6M
- -1.70%
- 1Y
- -15.13%
- 3Y*
- 0.31%
- 5Y*
- 11.37%
- 10Y*
- 17.60%
MLI
- 1D
- 1.54%
- 1M
- 4.86%
- YTD
- 22.23%
- 6M
- 19.55%
- 1Y
- 91.83%
- 3Y*
- 51.24%
- 5Y*
- 47.29%
- 10Y*
- 27.18%
BCC vs. MLI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCC Boise Cascade Company | -0.86% | -37.47% | -4.02% | 106.65% | 1.53% | 62.14% | 37.01% | 59.08% | -38.36% | 77.67% |
MLI Mueller Industries, Inc. | 22.23% | 46.29% | 70.51% | 62.38% | 1.05% | 70.95% | 12.30% | 37.79% | -33.10% | -2.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCC and MLI is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2013 | 0.53 |
The correlation between BCC and MLI shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.56 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BCC:
$2.98
MLI:
$10.18
BCC:
24.38
MLI:
13.71
BCC:
0.42
MLI:
2.66
BCC:
$6.37B
MLI:
$4.37B
BCC:
$709.89M
MLI:
$871.92M
BCC:
$308.65M
MLI:
$1.03B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCC vs. MLI — Risk / Return Rank
BCC
MLI
BCC vs. MLI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Boise Cascade Company (BCC) and Mueller Industries, Inc. (MLI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BCC | MLI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.53 | -0.57 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.51 | 4.13 | -4.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.86 | 11.47 | -12.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BCC vs. MLI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCC drawdown since its inception was -67.67%, which is greater than MLI's maximum drawdown of -61.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCC and MLI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCC | MLI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.67% | -61.72% | -5.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.60% | -22.33% | -7.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.47% | -27.79% | -28.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.47% | -27.79% | -28.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.47% | -52.95% | -3.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -51.61% | -0.68% | -50.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.12% | -16.03% | -7.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.58% | 8.03% | +9.55% |
Volatility
BCC vs. MLI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Boise Cascade Company (BCC) is 9.17%, while Mueller Industries, Inc. (MLI) has a volatility of 9.71%. This indicates that BCC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MLI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCC | MLI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.17% | 9.71% | -0.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.25% | 25.79% | +1.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.34% | 30.01% | +8.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.86% | 32.99% | +7.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.73% | 35.79% | +5.94% |
Dividends
BCC vs. MLI - Dividend Comparison
BCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, more than MLI's 0.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCC Boise Cascade Company | 1.21% | 1.17% | 4.90% | 6.73% | 5.84% | 7.61% | 4.18% | 3.75% | 5.45% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MLI Mueller Industries, Inc. | 0.86% | 0.87% | 1.01% | 1.27% | 1.69% | 0.88% | 1.14% | 1.26% | 1.71% | 9.60% | 0.94% | 1.11% |
Financials
BCC vs. MLI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Boise Cascade Company and Mueller Industries, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BCC vs. MLI - Profitability Comparison
BCC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Boise Cascade Company reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.50B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
MLI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mueller Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
BCC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Boise Cascade Company reported an operating income of 27.79M and revenue of 1.50B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.9%.
MLI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mueller Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 312.23M and revenue of 1.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.2%.
BCC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Boise Cascade Company reported a net income of 17.84M and revenue of 1.50B, resulting in a net margin of 1.2%.
MLI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mueller Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 239.02M and revenue of 1.19B, resulting in a net margin of 20.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BCC and MLI have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MLI has higher volatility (9.71%) compared to BCC (9.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCC dropped -67.67% vs MLI's -61.72%.
MLI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.08 vs -0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BCC and MLI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer