SSD vs. OC
SSD (Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.) and OC (Owens Corning) are both stocks. Both operate in the Building Products & Equipment industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 10 years, SSD returned 17.75%/yr vs 11.71%/yr for OC. Their 0.60 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
SSD vs. OC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSD achieves a 16.85% return, which is significantly lower than OC's 26.58% return. Over the past 10 years, SSD has outperformed OC with an annualized return of 17.75%, while OC has yielded a comparatively lower 11.71% annualized return.
SSD
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -6.47%
- 6M
- 6.54%
- YTD
- 16.85%
- 1Y
- 5.49%
- 3Y*
- 6.62%
- 5Y*
- 11.66%
- 10Y*
- 17.75%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.69%
OC
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -7.54%
- 6M
- 17.39%
- YTD
- 26.58%
- 1Y
- 4.30%
- 3Y*
- 1.39%
- 5Y*
- 9.63%
- 10Y*
- 11.71%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.51%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $107.87M | $128.78M | $158.61M | |
| $62.45M | $58.74M | $62.47M |
SSD vs. OC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSD Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. | 16.85% | -1.95% | -15.74% | 125.36% | -35.62% | 50.20% | 17.51% | 50.84% | -4.39% | 33.54% |
OC Owens Corning | 26.58% | -33.02% | 16.61% | 77.17% | -4.23% | 20.93% | 18.12% | 50.63% | -51.68% | 80.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSD and OC is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2006 | 0.60 |
The correlation between SSD and OC shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (all time) to 0.71 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SSD:
$7.72B
OC:
$11.19B
SSD:
$9.14
OC:
-$9.77
SSD:
3.21
OC:
0.77
SSD:
$2.42B
OC:
$9.84B
SSD:
$1.11B
OC:
$2.65B
SSD:
$604.64M
OC:
$528.00M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSD vs. OC — Risk / Return Rank
SSD
OC
SSD vs. OC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. (SSD) and Owens Corning (OC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SSD | OC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.05 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.26 | 0.06 | +0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.47 | 0.10 | +0.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SSD vs. OC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSD drawdown since its inception was -68.16%, smaller than the maximum OC drawdown of -85.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSD and OC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSD | OC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.16% | -85.22% | +17.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.38% | -37.33% | +16.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.40% | -52.48% | +18.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.50% | -52.48% | +7.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.50% | -66.57% | +22.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.16% | -31.50% | +20.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.33% | -20.73% | +4.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.27% | 21.25% | -9.98% |
Volatility
SSD vs. OC - Volatility Comparison
Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. (SSD) and Owens Corning (OC) have volatilities of 8.89% and 9.06%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SSD | OC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.89% | 9.06% | -0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.07% | 32.60% | -10.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.24% | 41.30% | -12.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.63% | 35.72% | -4.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.39% | 35.87% | -3.48% |
Dividends
SSD vs. OC - Dividend Comparison
SSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than OC's 2.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OC Owens Corning | 2.20% | 2.47% | 1.41% | 1.40% | 1.64% | 1.15% | 1.27% | 1.35% | 1.43% | 0.88% | 1.44% | 1.45% |
SSD Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. | 0.62% | 0.71% | 0.66% | 0.54% | 1.15% | 0.69% | 0.74% | 1.41% | 1.59% | 1.36% | 1.55% | 1.76% |
Financials
SSD vs. OC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. and Owens Corning. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SSD vs. OC - Profitability Comparison
SSD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. reported a gross profit of 318.19M and revenue of 671.08M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 47.4%.
OC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Owens Corning reported a gross profit of 510.00M and revenue of 2.27B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.5%.
SSD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. reported an operating income of 169.13M and revenue of 671.08M, resulting in an operating margin of 25.2%.
OC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Owens Corning reported an operating income of 120.00M and revenue of 2.27B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.3%.
SSD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. reported a net income of 127.04M and revenue of 671.08M, resulting in a net margin of 18.9%.
OC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Owens Corning reported a net income of -105.00M and revenue of 2.27B, resulting in a net margin of -4.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SSD and OC have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OC has higher volatility (9.06%) compared to SSD (8.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSD dropped -68.16% vs OC's -85.22%.
SSD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.18 vs 0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SSD and OC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer