BCC vs. LPX
BCC (Boise Cascade Company) and LPX (Louisiana-Pacific Corporation) are both stocks. BCC operates in Lumber & Wood Production (Basic Materials), while LPX operates in Building Products & Equipment (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, BCC returned 15.24%/yr vs 15.23%/yr for LPX. Their 0.65 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
BCC vs. LPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCC achieves a 4.39% return, which is significantly higher than LPX's -9.61% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BCC having a 15.24% annualized return and LPX not far behind at 15.23%.
BCC
- 1D
- 1.33%
- 1M
- 0.59%
- 6M
- -4.93%
- YTD
- 4.39%
- 1Y
- -7.32%
- 3Y*
- -7.28%
- 5Y*
- 13.90%
- 10Y*
- 15.24%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.80%
LPX
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- -8.67%
- 6M
- -12.82%
- YTD
- -9.61%
- 1Y
- -18.79%
- 3Y*
- -0.47%
- 5Y*
- 6.93%
- 10Y*
- 15.23%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.04%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $24.80M | $30.47M | $33.15M | |
| $73.81M | $84.43M | $87.70M |
BCC vs. LPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCC Boise Cascade Company | 4.39% | -37.47% | -4.02% | 106.65% | 1.53% | 62.14% | 37.01% | 59.08% | -38.36% | 77.67% |
LPX Louisiana-Pacific Corporation | -9.61% | -21.05% | 47.93% | 21.55% | -23.38% | 113.30% | 27.96% | 36.40% | -13.75% | 38.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCC and LPX is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2013 | 0.65 |
The correlation between BCC and LPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
BCC:
$2.69B
LPX:
$5.06B
BCC:
$3.00
LPX:
$1.17
BCC:
25.50
LPX:
61.83
BCC:
0.44
LPX:
1.98
BCC:
1.36
LPX:
2.93
BCC:
$6.37B
LPX:
$2.56B
BCC:
$709.89M
LPX:
$507.00M
BCC:
$308.65M
LPX:
$247.00M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCC vs. LPX — Risk / Return Rank
BCC
LPX
BCC vs. LPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Boise Cascade Company (BCC) and Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (LPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BCC | LPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 0.96 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.28 | -0.56 | +0.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.48 | -0.90 | +0.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BCC vs. LPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCC drawdown since its inception was -67.67%, smaller than the maximum LPX drawdown of -96.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCC and LPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCC | LPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.67% | -96.41% | +28.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.89% | -33.83% | +5.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.47% | -43.14% | -13.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.47% | -43.14% | -13.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.47% | -59.45% | +2.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.05% | -38.55% | -10.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.33% | -37.85% | +14.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.45% | 20.80% | -4.35% |
Volatility
BCC vs. LPX - Volatility Comparison
Boise Cascade Company (BCC) and Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (LPX) have volatilities of 12.90% and 13.05%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCC | LPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.90% | 13.05% | -0.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.93% | 31.94% | -3.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.72% | 42.77% | -3.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.12% | 40.11% | +1.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.69% | 40.99% | +0.70% |
Dividends
BCC vs. LPX - Dividend Comparison
BCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, less than LPX's 1.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCC Boise Cascade Company | 1.15% | 1.17% | 4.90% | 6.73% | 5.84% | 7.61% | 4.18% | 3.75% | 5.45% | 0.18% |
LPX Louisiana-Pacific Corporation | 1.60% | 1.39% | 1.00% | 1.36% | 1.49% | 0.87% | 1.56% | 1.82% | 2.34% | 0.00% |
Financials
BCC vs. LPX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Boise Cascade Company and Louisiana-Pacific Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BCC vs. LPX - Profitability Comparison
BCC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Boise Cascade Company reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.50B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
LPX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Louisiana-Pacific Corporation reported a gross profit of 115.00M and revenue of 574.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.0%.
BCC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Boise Cascade Company reported an operating income of 27.79M and revenue of 1.50B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.9%.
LPX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Louisiana-Pacific Corporation reported an operating income of 34.00M and revenue of 574.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.9%.
BCC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Boise Cascade Company reported a net income of 17.84M and revenue of 1.50B, resulting in a net margin of 1.2%.
LPX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Louisiana-Pacific Corporation reported a net income of 27.00M and revenue of 574.00M, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BCC and LPX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LPX has higher volatility (13.05%) compared to BCC (12.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCC dropped -67.67% vs LPX's -96.41%.
BCC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.20 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BCC and LPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer