PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
SSD vs. PHM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


SSDPHM
YTD Return-6.45%25.47%
1Y Return27.29%58.17%
3Y Return (Ann)16.44%37.46%
5Y Return (Ann)18.76%28.27%
10Y Return (Ann)20.36%21.60%
Sharpe Ratio0.891.85
Sortino Ratio1.362.53
Omega Ratio1.171.32
Calmar Ratio1.083.92
Martin Ratio1.989.92
Ulcer Index13.82%5.80%
Daily Std Dev30.80%31.17%
Max Drawdown-68.16%-92.40%
Current Drawdown-13.91%-13.53%

Fundamentals


SSDPHM
Market Cap$7.76B$26.43B
EPS$7.55$13.55
PE Ratio24.399.51
PEG Ratio1.470.34
Total Revenue (TTM)$2.22B$17.32B
Gross Profit (TTM)$1.02B$5.11B
EBITDA (TTM)$507.89M$3.78B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between SSD and PHM is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

SSD vs. PHM - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, SSD achieves a -6.45% return, which is significantly lower than PHM's 25.47% return. Over the past 10 years, SSD has underperformed PHM with an annualized return of 20.36%, while PHM has yielded a comparatively higher 21.60% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
5.14%
5.91%
SSD
PHM

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

SSD vs. PHM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. (SSD) and PulteGroup, Inc. (PHM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SSD
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SSD, currently valued at 0.89, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.89
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for SSD, currently valued at 1.36, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.36
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for SSD, currently valued at 1.17, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.17
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for SSD, currently valued at 1.08, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.08
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for SSD, currently valued at 1.98, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.001.98
PHM
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PHM, currently valued at 1.85, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.85
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for PHM, currently valued at 2.53, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.53
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for PHM, currently valued at 1.32, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.32
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for PHM, currently valued at 3.92, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.003.92
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for PHM, currently valued at 9.92, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.009.92

SSD vs. PHM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSD Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is lower than the PHM Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSD and PHM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.89
1.85
SSD
PHM

Dividends

SSD vs. PHM - Dividend Comparison

SSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than PHM's 0.62% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
SSD
Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.
0.60%0.54%1.15%0.69%0.74%1.41%1.59%1.36%1.55%1.76%1.17%1.02%
PHM
PulteGroup, Inc.
0.62%0.66%1.34%1.00%1.16%1.16%1.46%1.08%1.96%1.85%1.07%0.74%

Drawdowns

SSD vs. PHM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSD drawdown since its inception was -68.16%, smaller than the maximum PHM drawdown of -92.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSD and PHM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-13.91%
-13.53%
SSD
PHM

Volatility

SSD vs. PHM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. (SSD) is 9.39%, while PulteGroup, Inc. (PHM) has a volatility of 11.68%. This indicates that SSD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PHM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
9.39%
11.68%
SSD
PHM

Financials

SSD vs. PHM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. and PulteGroup, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items