PortfoliosLab logo
SSD vs. PHM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between SSD and PHM is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

SSD vs. PHM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. (SSD) and PulteGroup, Inc. (PHM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

SSD:

-0.34

PHM:

-0.35

Sortino Ratio

SSD:

-0.37

PHM:

-0.29

Omega Ratio

SSD:

0.96

PHM:

0.97

Calmar Ratio

SSD:

-0.35

PHM:

-0.31

Martin Ratio

SSD:

-0.96

PHM:

-0.61

Ulcer Index

SSD:

12.45%

PHM:

19.29%

Daily Std Dev

SSD:

30.62%

PHM:

34.08%

Max Drawdown

SSD:

-68.15%

PHM:

-92.40%

Current Drawdown

SSD:

-26.10%

PHM:

-30.97%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SSD:

$6.61B

PHM:

$20.72B

EPS

SSD:

$7.68

PHM:

$14.16

PE Ratio

SSD:

20.51

PHM:

7.24

PEG Ratio

SSD:

1.47

PHM:

0.30

PS Ratio

SSD:

2.95

PHM:

1.15

PB Ratio

SSD:

3.45

PHM:

1.68

Total Revenue (TTM)

SSD:

$2.24B

PHM:

$17.89B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SSD:

$1.03B

PHM:

$5.22B

EBITDA (TTM)

SSD:

$527.61M

PHM:

$3.96B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSD achieves a -4.70% return, which is significantly higher than PHM's -5.70% return. Over the past 10 years, SSD has underperformed PHM with an annualized return of 18.25%, while PHM has yielded a comparatively higher 19.61% annualized return.


SSD

YTD

-4.70%

1M

4.24%

6M

-16.49%

1Y

-10.50%

5Y*

17.09%

10Y*

18.25%

PHM

YTD

-5.70%

1M

5.45%

6M

-22.47%

1Y

-11.78%

5Y*

29.37%

10Y*

19.61%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

SSD vs. PHM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SSD is 2929
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SSD is 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SSD is 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SSD is 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SSD is 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SSD is 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

PHM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PHM is 3232
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PHM is 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PHM is 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PHM is 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PHM is 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PHM is 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

SSD vs. PHM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. (SSD) and PulteGroup, Inc. (PHM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current SSD Sharpe Ratio is -0.34, which is comparable to the PHM Sharpe Ratio of -0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSD and PHM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

SSD vs. PHM - Dividend Comparison

SSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%, less than PHM's 0.82% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
SSD
Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.
0.71%0.66%0.54%1.15%0.69%0.74%1.41%1.59%1.36%1.55%1.76%1.17%
PHM
PulteGroup, Inc.
0.82%0.75%0.66%1.34%1.00%1.16%1.16%1.46%1.08%1.96%1.85%1.07%

Drawdowns

SSD vs. PHM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSD drawdown since its inception was -68.15%, smaller than the maximum PHM drawdown of -92.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSD and PHM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

SSD vs. PHM - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...

Financials

SSD vs. PHM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. and PulteGroup, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20212022202320242025
538.90M
3.89B
(SSD) Total Revenue
(PHM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SSD vs. PHM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. and PulteGroup, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%20212022202320242025
46.8%
30.2%
(SSD) Gross Margin
(PHM) Gross Margin
SSD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. reported a gross profit of 252.04M and revenue of 538.90M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.8%.

PHM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, PulteGroup, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.17B and revenue of 3.89B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.2%.

SSD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. reported an operating income of 102.32M and revenue of 538.90M, resulting in an operating margin of 19.0%.

PHM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, PulteGroup, Inc. reported an operating income of 780.20M and revenue of 3.89B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.0%.

SSD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. reported a net income of 77.88M and revenue of 538.90M, resulting in a net margin of 14.5%.

PHM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, PulteGroup, Inc. reported a net income of 522.80M and revenue of 3.89B, resulting in a net margin of 13.4%.