SSD vs. PHM

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. (SSD) and PulteGroup, Inc. (PHM).

Performance

SSD vs. PHM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. (SSD) and PulteGroup, Inc. (PHM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SSD vs. PHM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SSD Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.	6.48%	-1.95%	-15.74%	125.36%	-35.62%	50.20%	17.51%	50.84%	-4.39%	33.54%
PHM PulteGroup, Inc.	0.51%	8.54%	6.22%	128.76%	-19.22%	34.03%	12.55%	51.33%	-20.76%	83.43%

Fundamentals

EPS SSD : $8.27 PHM : $12.92
PE Ratio SSD : 20.75 PHM : 9.10
PEG Ratio SSD : 2.48 PHM : 0.29
PS Ratio SSD : 3.07 PHM : 1.23
Total Revenue (TTM) SSD : $2.33B PHM : $12.71B
Gross Profit (TTM) SSD : $1.07B PHM : $3.49B
EBITDA (TTM) SSD : $552.61M PHM : $2.33B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSD achieves a 6.48% return, which is significantly higher than PHM's 0.51% return. Over the past 10 years, SSD has underperformed PHM with an annualized return of 17.54%, while PHM has yielded a comparatively higher 21.81% annualized return.

SSD

• 1D: 2.66%
• 1M: -11.34%
• YTD: 6.48%
• 6M: 2.85%
• 1Y: 10.03%
• 3Y*: 16.92%
• 5Y*: 11.10%
• 10Y*: 17.54%

PHM

• 1D: 3.42%
• 1M: -14.10%
• YTD: 0.51%
• 6M: -10.62%
• 1Y: 15.32%
• 3Y*: 27.34%
• 5Y*: 18.20%
• 10Y*: 21.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

SSD vs. PHM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSD

SSD Risk / Return Rank: 51
SSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
SSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
SSD Omega Ratio Rank: 46
SSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
SSD Martin Ratio Rank: 53

PHM

PHM Risk / Return Rank: 57
PHM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
PHM Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
PHM Omega Ratio Rank: 51
PHM Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
PHM Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSD vs. PHM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. (SSD) and PulteGroup, Inc. (PHM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SSD	PHM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.32	0.43	-0.11
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.73	0.94	-0.20
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.11	-0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.49	0.82	-0.34
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.01	1.76	-0.75
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SSD vs. PHM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSD Sharpe Ratio is 0.32, which is comparable to the PHM Sharpe Ratio of 0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSD and PHM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SSD	PHM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.32	0.43	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.36	0.53	-0.17
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.55	0.60	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.41	0.26	+0.16

Correlation

The correlation between SSD and PHM is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

SSD vs. PHM - Dividend Comparison

SSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, less than PHM's 0.82% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SSD Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.	0.67%	0.71%	0.66%	0.54%	1.15%	0.69%	0.74%	1.41%	1.59%	1.36%	1.55%	1.76%
PHM PulteGroup, Inc.	0.82%	0.78%	0.75%	0.66%	1.34%	1.00%	1.16%	1.16%	1.46%	1.08%	1.96%	1.85%

Drawdowns

SSD vs. PHM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSD drawdown since its inception was -68.16%, smaller than the maximum PHM drawdown of -92.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSD and PHM.

Drawdown Indicators

	SSD	PHM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-68.16%	-92.40%	+24.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.17%	-20.06%	-0.11%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-44.50%	-40.99%	-3.51%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.50%	-62.11%	+17.61%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.05%	-20.14%	+1.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.39%	-35.56%	+19.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.75%	9.41%	+0.34%

Volatility

SSD vs. PHM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. (SSD) is 6.60%, while PulteGroup, Inc. (PHM) has a volatility of 8.73%. This indicates that SSD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PHM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SSD	PHM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.60%	8.73%	-2.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.50%	22.57%	-3.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.28%	35.76%	-4.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.15%	34.60%	-3.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.02%	36.38%	-4.36%

Financials

SSD vs. PHM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. and PulteGroup, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

SSD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. reported a gross profit of 235.07M and revenue of 539.35M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.6%.

PHM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, PulteGroup, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.24M and revenue of 4.61M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.8%.

SSD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. reported an operating income of 73.23M and revenue of 539.35M, resulting in an operating margin of 13.6%.

PHM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, PulteGroup, Inc. reported an operating income of 847.98K and revenue of 4.61M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.4%.

SSD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. reported a net income of 56.21M and revenue of 539.35M, resulting in a net margin of 10.4%.

PHM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, PulteGroup, Inc. reported a net income of 501.61K and revenue of 4.61M, resulting in a net margin of 10.9%.