BCC vs. WFG
BCC (Boise Cascade Company) and WFG (West Fraser Timber Co Ltd) are both stocks. Both operate in the Lumber & Wood Production industry within the Basic Materials sector. Over the past 10 years, BCC returned 17.60%/yr vs 10.45%/yr for WFG. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BCC vs. WFG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCC achieves a -0.86% return, which is significantly lower than WFG's 13.01% return. Over the past 10 years, BCC has outperformed WFG with an annualized return of 17.60%, while WFG has yielded a comparatively lower 10.45% annualized return.
BCC
- 1D
- -2.84%
- 1M
- 8.35%
- YTD
- -0.86%
- 6M
- -1.70%
- 1Y
- -15.13%
- 3Y*
- 0.31%
- 5Y*
- 11.37%
- 10Y*
- 17.60%
WFG
- 1D
- -2.12%
- 1M
- 10.64%
- YTD
- 13.01%
- 6M
- 16.50%
- 1Y
- -4.21%
- 3Y*
- -3.87%
- 5Y*
- 0.89%
- 10Y*
- 10.45%
BCC vs. WFG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCC Boise Cascade Company | -0.86% | -37.47% | -4.02% | 106.65% | 1.53% | 62.14% | 37.01% | 59.08% | -38.36% | 77.67% |
WFG West Fraser Timber Co Ltd | 13.01% | -28.08% | 2.80% | 20.26% | -22.82% | 49.57% | 47.93% | -8.82% | -19.45% | 73.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCC and WFG is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2013 | 0.39 |
Over the past year, BCC and WFG have become more correlated (0.60) than their long-term average of 0.39, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
BCC:
$2.61B
WFG:
$5.38B
BCC:
$2.98
WFG:
-CA$19.47
BCC:
0.42
WFG:
1.21
BCC:
1.30
WFG:
0.97
BCC:
$6.37B
WFG:
CA$6.31B
BCC:
$709.89M
WFG:
-CA$205.25M
BCC:
$308.65M
WFG:
-CA$89.14M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCC vs. WFG — Risk / Return Rank
BCC
WFG
BCC vs. WFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Boise Cascade Company (BCC) and West Fraser Timber Co Ltd (WFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BCC | WFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.00 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.51 | -0.17 | -0.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.86 | -0.29 | -0.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BCC vs. WFG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCC drawdown since its inception was -67.67%, smaller than the maximum WFG drawdown of -83.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCC and WFG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCC | WFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.67% | -83.25% | +15.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.60% | -25.37% | -4.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.47% | -41.68% | -14.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.47% | -41.68% | -14.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.47% | -78.66% | +22.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -51.61% | -30.08% | -21.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.12% | -30.91% | +7.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.58% | 14.69% | +2.89% |
Volatility
BCC vs. WFG - Volatility Comparison
Boise Cascade Company (BCC) has a higher volatility of 9.17% compared to West Fraser Timber Co Ltd (WFG) at 8.65%. This indicates that BCC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WFG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCC | WFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.17% | 8.65% | +0.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.25% | 23.43% | +3.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.34% | 32.13% | +6.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.86% | 33.95% | +6.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.73% | 39.89% | +1.84% |
Dividends
BCC vs. WFG - Dividend Comparison
BCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, less than WFG's 1.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCC Boise Cascade Company | 1.21% | 1.17% | 4.90% | 6.73% | 5.84% | 7.61% | 4.18% | 3.75% | 5.45% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WFG West Fraser Timber Co Ltd | 1.86% | 2.09% | 1.61% | 1.40% | 2.03% | 0.59% | 0.93% | 1.37% | 1.15% | 0.41% | 0.79% | 0.74% |
Financials
BCC vs. WFG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Boise Cascade Company and West Fraser Timber Co Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BCC vs. WFG - Profitability Comparison
BCC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Boise Cascade Company reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.50B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
WFG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, West Fraser Timber Co Ltd reported a gross profit of 23.38M and revenue of 1.83B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 1.3%.
BCC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Boise Cascade Company reported an operating income of 27.79M and revenue of 1.50B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.9%.
WFG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, West Fraser Timber Co Ltd reported an operating income of -288.80M and revenue of 1.83B, resulting in an operating margin of -15.7%.
BCC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Boise Cascade Company reported a net income of 17.84M and revenue of 1.50B, resulting in a net margin of 1.2%.
WFG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, West Fraser Timber Co Ltd reported a net income of -258.55M and revenue of 1.83B, resulting in a net margin of -14.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BCC and WFG have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BCC has higher volatility (9.17%) compared to WFG (8.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCC dropped -67.67% vs WFG's -83.25%.
WFG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.13 vs -0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BCC and WFG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer