PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSD vs. COST
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

SSD vs. COST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. (SSD) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SSD vs. COST - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SSD
Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.
6.48%-1.95%-15.74%125.36%-35.62%50.20%17.51%50.84%-4.39%33.54%
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
15.71%-5.39%39.62%49.00%-19.05%51.82%32.67%45.70%10.60%22.37%

Fundamentals

EPS

SSD:

$8.27

COST:

$25.63

PE Ratio

SSD:

20.75

COST:

38.87

PEG Ratio

SSD:

2.48

COST:

3.04

PS Ratio

SSD:

3.07

COST:

1.16

Total Revenue (TTM)

SSD:

$2.33B

COST:

$286.27B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SSD:

$1.07B

COST:

$19.33B

EBITDA (TTM)

SSD:

$552.61M

COST:

$12.73B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSD achieves a 6.48% return, which is significantly lower than COST's 15.71% return. Over the past 10 years, SSD has underperformed COST with an annualized return of 17.54%, while COST has yielded a comparatively higher 22.28% annualized return.


SSD

1D
2.66%
1M
-11.34%
YTD
6.48%
6M
2.85%
1Y
10.03%
3Y*
16.92%
5Y*
11.10%
10Y*
17.54%

COST

1D
-0.02%
1M
-1.42%
YTD
15.71%
6M
7.95%
1Y
5.93%
3Y*
27.83%
5Y*
24.28%
10Y*
22.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SSD vs. COST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSD
SSD Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
SSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSD Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
SSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSD Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

COST
COST Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
COST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COST Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
COST Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
COST Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
COST Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSD vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. (SSD) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SSDCOSTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.32

0.30

+0.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.73

0.57

+0.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.07

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.49

0.40

+0.09

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.01

0.80

+0.21

SSD vs. COST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSD Sharpe Ratio is 0.32, which is comparable to the COST Sharpe Ratio of 0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSD and COST, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SSDCOSTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

0.30

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

1.08

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

1.02

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.59

-0.18

Correlation

The correlation between SSD and COST is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

SSD vs. COST - Dividend Comparison

SSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, more than COST's 0.52% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SSD
Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.
0.67%0.71%0.66%0.54%1.15%0.69%0.74%1.41%1.59%1.36%1.55%1.76%
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
0.52%0.59%0.49%2.87%0.76%0.54%3.38%0.86%1.08%4.81%1.09%4.06%

Drawdowns

SSD vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSD drawdown since its inception was -68.16%, which is greater than COST's maximum drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSD and COST.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SSDCOSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.16%

-53.39%

-14.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.17%

-19.35%

-0.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.50%

-31.40%

-13.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.50%

-31.40%

-13.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.05%

-6.96%

-12.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.39%

-13.40%

-2.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.75%

9.67%

+0.08%

Volatility

SSD vs. COST - Volatility Comparison

Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. (SSD) has a higher volatility of 6.60% compared to Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) at 4.41%. This indicates that SSD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SSDCOSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.60%

4.41%

+2.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.50%

13.36%

+6.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.28%

20.15%

+11.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.15%

22.51%

+8.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.02%

21.90%

+10.12%

Financials

SSD vs. COST - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00BAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
539.35M
69.60B
(SSD) Total Revenue
(COST) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SSD vs. COST - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. and Costco Wholesale Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-10.0%0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
43.6%
-12.6%
Portfolio components
SSD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. reported a gross profit of 235.07M and revenue of 539.35M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.6%.

COST - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a gross profit of -8.80B and revenue of 69.60B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -12.6%.

SSD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. reported an operating income of 73.23M and revenue of 539.35M, resulting in an operating margin of 13.6%.

COST - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported an operating income of 2.61B and revenue of 69.60B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.7%.

SSD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. reported a net income of 56.21M and revenue of 539.35M, resulting in a net margin of 10.4%.

COST - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a net income of 2.04B and revenue of 69.60B, resulting in a net margin of 2.9%.