PortfoliosLab logo
SSD vs. COST
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between SSD and COST is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

SSD vs. COST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. (SSD) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

SSD:

-0.34

COST:

1.39

Sortino Ratio

SSD:

-0.37

COST:

1.96

Omega Ratio

SSD:

0.96

COST:

1.27

Calmar Ratio

SSD:

-0.35

COST:

1.81

Martin Ratio

SSD:

-0.96

COST:

5.32

Ulcer Index

SSD:

12.45%

COST:

5.89%

Daily Std Dev

SSD:

30.62%

COST:

21.91%

Max Drawdown

SSD:

-68.15%

COST:

-53.39%

Current Drawdown

SSD:

-26.10%

COST:

-6.26%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SSD:

$6.61B

COST:

$450.29B

EPS

SSD:

$7.68

COST:

$17.15

PE Ratio

SSD:

20.51

COST:

59.18

PEG Ratio

SSD:

1.47

COST:

5.34

PS Ratio

SSD:

2.95

COST:

1.71

PB Ratio

SSD:

3.45

COST:

17.49

Total Revenue (TTM)

SSD:

$2.24B

COST:

$264.09B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SSD:

$1.03B

COST:

$35.11B

EBITDA (TTM)

SSD:

$527.61M

COST:

$11.25B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSD achieves a -4.70% return, which is significantly lower than COST's 10.29% return. Over the past 10 years, SSD has underperformed COST with an annualized return of 18.25%, while COST has yielded a comparatively higher 23.69% annualized return.


SSD

YTD

-4.70%

1M

4.24%

6M

-16.49%

1Y

-10.50%

5Y*

17.09%

10Y*

18.25%

COST

YTD

10.29%

1M

4.58%

6M

7.07%

1Y

30.07%

5Y*

29.12%

10Y*

23.69%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

SSD vs. COST — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SSD is 2929
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SSD is 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SSD is 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SSD is 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SSD is 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SSD is 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

COST
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of COST is 8888
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of COST is 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of COST is 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of COST is 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of COST is 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of COST is 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

SSD vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. (SSD) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current SSD Sharpe Ratio is -0.34, which is lower than the COST Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSD and COST, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

SSD vs. COST - Dividend Comparison

SSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%, more than COST's 0.47% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
SSD
Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.
0.71%0.66%0.54%1.15%0.69%0.74%1.41%1.59%1.36%1.55%1.76%1.17%
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
0.47%0.49%2.87%0.76%0.54%3.38%0.86%1.08%4.81%1.09%4.06%0.97%

Drawdowns

SSD vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSD drawdown since its inception was -68.15%, which is greater than COST's maximum drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSD and COST. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

SSD vs. COST - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...

Financials

SSD vs. COST - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20212022202320242025
538.90M
63.72B
(SSD) Total Revenue
(COST) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SSD vs. COST - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. and Costco Wholesale Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%20212022202320242025
46.8%
15.1%
(SSD) Gross Margin
(COST) Gross Margin
SSD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. reported a gross profit of 252.04M and revenue of 538.90M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.8%.

COST - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a gross profit of 9.61B and revenue of 63.72B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.1%.

SSD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. reported an operating income of 102.32M and revenue of 538.90M, resulting in an operating margin of 19.0%.

COST - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported an operating income of 2.32B and revenue of 63.72B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.6%.

SSD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. reported a net income of 77.88M and revenue of 538.90M, resulting in a net margin of 14.5%.

COST - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a net income of 1.79B and revenue of 63.72B, resulting in a net margin of 2.8%.