PortfoliosLab logo
BCC vs. WRB
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between BCC and WRB is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

BCC vs. WRB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Boise Cascade Company (BCC) and W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BCC:

-0.92

WRB:

1.86

Sortino Ratio

BCC:

-1.34

WRB:

2.45

Omega Ratio

BCC:

0.85

WRB:

1.35

Calmar Ratio

BCC:

-0.83

WRB:

3.87

Martin Ratio

BCC:

-1.65

WRB:

10.20

Ulcer Index

BCC:

21.92%

WRB:

4.52%

Daily Std Dev

BCC:

39.14%

WRB:

24.11%

Max Drawdown

BCC:

-67.67%

WRB:

-69.19%

Current Drawdown

BCC:

-43.35%

WRB:

0.00%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BCC:

$3.31B

WRB:

$28.06B

EPS

BCC:

$8.02

WRB:

$4.35

PE Ratio

BCC:

10.95

WRB:

17.00

PEG Ratio

BCC:

1.09

WRB:

18.22

PS Ratio

BCC:

0.50

WRB:

2.01

PB Ratio

BCC:

1.55

WRB:

3.12

Total Revenue (TTM)

BCC:

$6.62B

WRB:

$13.93B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BCC:

$2.49B

WRB:

$13.93B

EBITDA (TTM)

BCC:

$539.43M

WRB:

$2.13B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCC achieves a -26.91% return, which is significantly lower than WRB's 27.79% return. Over the past 10 years, BCC has underperformed WRB with an annualized return of 9.18%, while WRB has yielded a comparatively higher 20.15% annualized return.


BCC

YTD

-26.91%

1M

-6.86%

6M

-41.14%

1Y

-35.68%

3Y*

3.96%

5Y*

20.62%

10Y*

9.18%

WRB

YTD

27.79%

1M

4.18%

6M

16.97%

1Y

44.40%

3Y*

18.94%

5Y*

26.23%

10Y*

20.15%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Boise Cascade Company

W. R. Berkley Corporation

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BCC vs. WRB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BCC is 66
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BCC is 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BCC is 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BCC is 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BCC is 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BCC is 33
Martin Ratio Rank

WRB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of WRB is 9393
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of WRB is 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of WRB is 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of WRB is 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of WRB is 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of WRB is 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BCC vs. WRB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Boise Cascade Company (BCC) and W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current BCC Sharpe Ratio is -0.92, which is lower than the WRB Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCC and WRB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

BCC vs. WRB - Dividend Comparison

BCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.71%, more than WRB's 1.88% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
BCC
Boise Cascade Company
6.71%4.90%6.73%5.84%7.61%4.18%3.75%5.45%0.18%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WRB
W. R. Berkley Corporation
1.88%2.39%2.73%1.22%2.44%0.71%2.43%2.83%2.16%2.27%0.86%2.79%

Drawdowns

BCC vs. WRB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCC drawdown since its inception was -67.67%, roughly equal to the maximum WRB drawdown of -69.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCC and WRB.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

BCC vs. WRB - Volatility Comparison

Boise Cascade Company (BCC) has a higher volatility of 12.09% compared to W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB) at 4.81%. This indicates that BCC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WRB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

BCC vs. WRB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Boise Cascade Company and W. R. Berkley Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B3.50B20212022202320242025
1.54B
3.55B
(BCC) Total Revenue
(WRB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items