PortfoliosLab logo
BCC vs. WRB
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between BCC and WRB is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

BCC vs. WRB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Boise Cascade Company (BCC) and W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

400.00%500.00%600.00%700.00%800.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
403.79%
658.07%
BCC
WRB

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BCC:

-0.83

WRB:

1.74

Sortino Ratio

BCC:

-1.01

WRB:

2.27

Omega Ratio

BCC:

0.89

WRB:

1.33

Calmar Ratio

BCC:

-0.68

WRB:

3.51

Martin Ratio

BCC:

-1.47

WRB:

9.25

Ulcer Index

BCC:

19.64%

WRB:

4.52%

Daily Std Dev

BCC:

38.37%

WRB:

24.01%

Max Drawdown

BCC:

-67.67%

WRB:

-69.19%

Current Drawdown

BCC:

-41.69%

WRB:

-0.81%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BCC:

$3.64B

WRB:

$27.00B

EPS

BCC:

$9.57

WRB:

$4.31

PE Ratio

BCC:

10.05

WRB:

16.52

PEG Ratio

BCC:

1.09

WRB:

18.05

PS Ratio

BCC:

0.54

WRB:

1.97

PB Ratio

BCC:

1.69

WRB:

3.09

Total Revenue (TTM)

BCC:

$6.62B

WRB:

$13.96B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BCC:

$2.49B

WRB:

$12.06B

EBITDA (TTM)

BCC:

$539.43M

WRB:

$2.29B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCC achieves a -25.30% return, which is significantly lower than WRB's 24.03% return. Over the past 10 years, BCC has underperformed WRB with an annualized return of 14.34%, while WRB has yielded a comparatively higher 19.81% annualized return.


BCC

YTD

-25.30%

1M

-9.98%

6M

-37.52%

1Y

-31.80%

5Y*

30.67%

10Y*

14.34%

WRB

YTD

24.03%

1M

8.31%

6M

21.03%

1Y

41.41%

5Y*

28.44%

10Y*

19.81%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BCC vs. WRB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BCC is 1111
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BCC is 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BCC is 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BCC is 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BCC is 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BCC is 88
Martin Ratio Rank

WRB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of WRB is 9393
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of WRB is 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of WRB is 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of WRB is 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of WRB is 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of WRB is 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BCC vs. WRB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Boise Cascade Company (BCC) and W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current BCC Sharpe Ratio is -0.83, which is lower than the WRB Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCC and WRB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.50-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.502.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.83
1.74
BCC
WRB

Dividends

BCC vs. WRB - Dividend Comparison

BCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.58%, more than WRB's 1.94% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
BCC
Boise Cascade Company
6.58%4.90%6.73%5.84%7.61%4.18%3.75%5.45%0.18%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WRB
W. R. Berkley Corporation
1.94%2.39%2.73%1.22%2.44%0.71%2.43%2.83%2.16%2.27%0.86%2.79%

Drawdowns

BCC vs. WRB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCC drawdown since its inception was -67.67%, roughly equal to the maximum WRB drawdown of -69.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCC and WRB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-41.69%
-0.81%
BCC
WRB

Volatility

BCC vs. WRB - Volatility Comparison

Boise Cascade Company (BCC) has a higher volatility of 10.73% compared to W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB) at 6.94%. This indicates that BCC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WRB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
10.73%
6.94%
BCC
WRB

Financials

BCC vs. WRB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Boise Cascade Company and W. R. Berkley Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B3.50B20212022202320242025
1.54B
3.53B
(BCC) Total Revenue
(WRB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BCC vs. WRB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Boise Cascade Company and W. R. Berkley Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
100.0%
100.0%
(BCC) Gross Margin
(WRB) Gross Margin
BCC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Boise Cascade Company reported a gross profit of 1.54B and revenue of 1.54B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

WRB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, W. R. Berkley Corporation reported a gross profit of 3.53B and revenue of 3.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

BCC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Boise Cascade Company reported an operating income of 54.52M and revenue of 1.54B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.6%.

WRB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, W. R. Berkley Corporation reported an operating income of 538.61M and revenue of 3.53B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.3%.

BCC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Boise Cascade Company reported a net income of 40.35M and revenue of 1.54B, resulting in a net margin of 2.6%.

WRB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, W. R. Berkley Corporation reported a net income of 417.57M and revenue of 3.53B, resulting in a net margin of 11.8%.