BCC vs. WRB
Compare and contrast key facts about Boise Cascade Company (BCC) and W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BCC or WRB.
Correlation
The correlation between BCC and WRB is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
BCC vs. WRB - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
BCC:
0.10
WRB:
1.36
BCC:
0.42
WRB:
1.83
BCC:
1.05
WRB:
1.27
BCC:
0.15
WRB:
2.24
BCC:
0.36
WRB:
4.87
BCC:
10.74%
WRB:
6.14%
BCC:
38.04%
WRB:
21.97%
BCC:
-67.67%
WRB:
-69.20%
BCC:
-19.39%
WRB:
-8.94%
Fundamentals
BCC:
$5.11B
WRB:
$22.43B
BCC:
$10.21
WRB:
$3.90
BCC:
13.04
WRB:
15.09
BCC:
1.09
WRB:
2.45
BCC:
$6.80B
WRB:
$13.17B
BCC:
$1.30B
WRB:
$9.54B
BCC:
$686.62M
WRB:
$2.08B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCC achieves a -0.53% return, which is significantly lower than WRB's 27.30% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BCC having a 17.63% annualized return and WRB not far behind at 16.87%.
BCC
-0.53%
-10.54%
4.80%
3.14%
35.48%
17.63%
WRB
27.30%
-4.84%
11.70%
28.22%
16.37%
16.87%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BCC vs. WRB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Boise Cascade Company (BCC) and W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BCC vs. WRB - Dividend Comparison
BCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.74%, more than WRB's 2.38% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCC Boise Cascade Company | 4.74% | 6.73% | 5.84% | 7.61% | 4.18% | 3.75% | 5.45% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WRB W. R. Berkley Corporation | 2.38% | 2.73% | 1.22% | 2.44% | 0.71% | 2.43% | 2.83% | 2.16% | 2.27% | 0.86% | 2.79% | 0.90% |
Drawdowns
BCC vs. WRB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCC drawdown since its inception was -67.67%, roughly equal to the maximum WRB drawdown of -69.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCC and WRB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BCC vs. WRB - Volatility Comparison
Boise Cascade Company (BCC) has a higher volatility of 10.58% compared to W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB) at 5.08%. This indicates that BCC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WRB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
BCC vs. WRB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Boise Cascade Company and W. R. Berkley Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities