PortfoliosLab logo
BCC vs. CMC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between BCC and CMC is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

BCC vs. CMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Boise Cascade Company (BCC) and Commercial Metals Company (CMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BCC:

-0.85

CMC:

-0.42

Sortino Ratio

BCC:

-1.15

CMC:

-0.38

Omega Ratio

BCC:

0.87

CMC:

0.95

Calmar Ratio

BCC:

-0.75

CMC:

-0.41

Martin Ratio

BCC:

-1.58

CMC:

-0.88

Ulcer Index

BCC:

20.60%

CMC:

17.71%

Daily Std Dev

BCC:

39.18%

CMC:

38.21%

Max Drawdown

BCC:

-67.67%

CMC:

-83.77%

Current Drawdown

BCC:

-40.07%

CMC:

-23.57%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BCC:

$3.46B

CMC:

$5.43B

EPS

BCC:

$8.02

CMC:

$0.60

PE Ratio

BCC:

11.46

CMC:

80.07

PEG Ratio

BCC:

1.09

CMC:

12.25

PS Ratio

BCC:

0.52

CMC:

0.70

PB Ratio

BCC:

1.61

CMC:

1.35

Total Revenue (TTM)

BCC:

$6.62B

CMC:

$7.74B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BCC:

$2.49B

CMC:

$1.19B

EBITDA (TTM)

BCC:

$539.43M

CMC:

$429.51M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCC achieves a -22.67% return, which is significantly lower than CMC's -2.43% return. Over the past 10 years, BCC has underperformed CMC with an annualized return of 9.63%, while CMC has yielded a comparatively higher 13.75% annualized return.


BCC

YTD

-22.67%

1M

-1.67%

6M

-34.39%

1Y

-32.44%

5Y*

23.66%

10Y*

9.63%

CMC

YTD

-2.43%

1M

13.49%

6M

-18.46%

1Y

-15.42%

5Y*

26.32%

10Y*

13.75%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BCC vs. CMC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BCC is 88
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BCC is 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BCC is 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BCC is 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BCC is 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BCC is 44
Martin Ratio Rank

CMC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CMC is 2626
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CMC is 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CMC is 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CMC is 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CMC is 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CMC is 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BCC vs. CMC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Boise Cascade Company (BCC) and Commercial Metals Company (CMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current BCC Sharpe Ratio is -0.85, which is lower than the CMC Sharpe Ratio of -0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCC and CMC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

BCC vs. CMC - Dividend Comparison

BCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.34%, more than CMC's 1.50% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
BCC
Boise Cascade Company
6.34%4.90%6.73%5.84%7.61%4.18%3.75%5.45%0.18%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CMC
Commercial Metals Company
1.50%1.41%1.28%1.20%1.38%2.34%2.16%3.00%2.25%2.20%3.51%2.95%

Drawdowns

BCC vs. CMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCC drawdown since its inception was -67.67%, smaller than the maximum CMC drawdown of -83.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCC and CMC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

BCC vs. CMC - Volatility Comparison

Boise Cascade Company (BCC) has a higher volatility of 11.75% compared to Commercial Metals Company (CMC) at 7.88%. This indicates that BCC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

BCC vs. CMC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Boise Cascade Company and Commercial Metals Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20212022202320242025
1.54B
1.75B
(BCC) Total Revenue
(CMC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BCC vs. CMC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Boise Cascade Company and Commercial Metals Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
100.0%
12.5%
(BCC) Gross Margin
(CMC) Gross Margin
BCC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Boise Cascade Company reported a gross profit of 1.54B and revenue of 1.54B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

CMC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Commercial Metals Company reported a gross profit of 219.55M and revenue of 1.75B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.5%.

BCC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Boise Cascade Company reported an operating income of 54.52M and revenue of 1.54B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.6%.

CMC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Commercial Metals Company reported an operating income of 51.99M and revenue of 1.75B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.0%.

BCC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Boise Cascade Company reported a net income of 40.35M and revenue of 1.54B, resulting in a net margin of 2.6%.

CMC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Commercial Metals Company reported a net income of 25.47M and revenue of 1.75B, resulting in a net margin of 1.5%.