BCC vs. CMC
BCC (Boise Cascade Company) and CMC (Commercial Metals Company) are both stocks. Both are in the Basic Materials sector — BCC in Lumber & Wood Production, CMC in Steel. Over the past 10 years, BCC returned 15.24%/yr vs 17.55%/yr for CMC. Their 0.48 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
BCC vs. CMC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCC achieves a 4.39% return, which is significantly higher than CMC's 0.16% return. Over the past 10 years, BCC has underperformed CMC with an annualized return of 15.24%, while CMC has yielded a comparatively higher 17.55% annualized return.
BCC
- 1D
- 1.33%
- 1M
- 0.59%
- 6M
- -4.93%
- YTD
- 4.39%
- 1Y
- -7.32%
- 3Y*
- -7.28%
- 5Y*
- 13.90%
- 10Y*
- 15.24%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.80%
CMC
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 11.69%
- 6M
- -10.02%
- YTD
- 0.16%
- 1Y
- 38.30%
- 3Y*
- 7.31%
- 5Y*
- 17.53%
- 10Y*
- 17.55%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.62%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $24.80M | $30.47M | $33.15M | |
| $69.70M | $75.47M | $85.50M |
BCC vs. CMC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCC Boise Cascade Company | 4.39% | -37.47% | -4.02% | 106.65% | 1.53% | 62.14% | 37.01% | 59.08% | -38.36% | 77.67% |
CMC Commercial Metals Company | 0.16% | 41.52% | 0.41% | 4.99% | 35.05% | 79.83% | -5.45% | 42.81% | -23.17% | 0.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCC and CMC is 0.47, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.55 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2013 | 0.48 |
The correlation between BCC and CMC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
BCC:
$2.69B
CMC:
$7.60B
BCC:
$3.00
CMC:
$5.30
BCC:
25.50
CMC:
12.96
BCC:
0.44
CMC:
0.87
BCC:
1.36
CMC:
1.70
BCC:
$6.37B
CMC:
$8.85B
BCC:
$709.89M
CMC:
$392.81M
BCC:
$308.65M
CMC:
$865.35M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCC vs. CMC — Risk / Return Rank
BCC
CMC
BCC vs. CMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Boise Cascade Company (BCC) and Commercial Metals Company (CMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BCC | CMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.17 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.28 | 1.14 | -1.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.48 | 2.71 | -3.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BCC vs. CMC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCC drawdown since its inception was -67.67%, smaller than the maximum CMC drawdown of -83.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCC and CMC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCC | CMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.67% | -83.77% | +16.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.89% | -29.96% | +2.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.47% | -37.63% | -18.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.47% | -37.63% | -18.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.47% | -53.78% | -2.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.05% | -16.88% | -32.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.33% | -23.50% | +0.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.45% | 12.61% | +3.84% |
Volatility
BCC vs. CMC - Volatility Comparison
Boise Cascade Company (BCC) has a higher volatility of 12.90% compared to Commercial Metals Company (CMC) at 9.87%. This indicates that BCC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCC | CMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.90% | 9.87% | +3.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.93% | 27.60% | +1.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.72% | 36.57% | +3.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.12% | 35.94% | +5.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.69% | 39.89% | +1.80% |
Dividends
BCC vs. CMC - Dividend Comparison
BCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, more than CMC's 1.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCC Boise Cascade Company | 1.15% | 1.17% | 4.90% | 6.73% | 5.84% | 7.61% | 4.18% | 3.75% | 5.45% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CMC Commercial Metals Company | 1.11% | 1.04% | 1.41% | 1.28% | 1.20% | 1.38% | 2.34% | 2.16% | 3.00% | 2.25% | 2.20% | 3.51% |
Financials
BCC vs. CMC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Boise Cascade Company and Commercial Metals Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BCC vs. CMC - Profitability Comparison
BCC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Boise Cascade Company reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.50B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
CMC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Commercial Metals Company reported a gross profit of -795.04M and revenue of 2.48B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -32.0%.
BCC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Boise Cascade Company reported an operating income of 27.79M and revenue of 1.50B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.9%.
CMC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Commercial Metals Company reported an operating income of -366.25M and revenue of 2.48B, resulting in an operating margin of -14.8%.
BCC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Boise Cascade Company reported a net income of 17.84M and revenue of 1.50B, resulting in a net margin of 1.2%.
CMC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Commercial Metals Company reported a net income of 173.02M and revenue of 2.48B, resulting in a net margin of 7.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BCC and CMC have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BCC has higher volatility (12.90%) compared to CMC (9.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCC dropped -67.67% vs CMC's -83.77%.
CMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.94 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BCC and CMC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer