PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SQY vs. VGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SQY vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax SQ Option Income Strategy ETF (SQY) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SQY achieves a 4.45% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 33.62% return.


SQY

1D
-1.63%
1M
0.60%
YTD
4.45%
6M
14.28%
1Y
7.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VGT

1D
1.27%
1M
19.95%
YTD
33.62%
6M
32.71%
1Y
65.14%
3Y*
34.15%
5Y*
23.05%
10Y*
25.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SQY vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SQY
YieldMax SQ Option Income Strategy ETF
4.45%-29.43%21.72%44.45%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
33.62%21.77%29.30%12.49%

Correlation

The correlation between SQY and VGT is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2023

0.49

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SQY vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SQY
SQY Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
SQY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SQY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
SQY Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
SQY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
SQY Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

VGT
VGT Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SQY vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax SQ Option Income Strategy ETF (SQY) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SQYVGTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.19

3.19

-3.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.51

3.88

-3.36

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.51

-0.44

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.19

4.06

-3.88

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.41

13.01

-12.59

SQY vs. VGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SQY Sharpe Ratio is 0.19, which is lower than the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 3.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SQY and VGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SQYVGTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

3.19

-3.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.68

-0.44

Drawdowns

SQY vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SQY drawdown since its inception was -52.30%, roughly equal to the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SQY and VGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SQYVGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.30%

-54.63%

+2.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.72%

-16.40%

-21.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.42%

0.00%

-34.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.80%

-7.95%

-13.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.14%

5.12%

+12.02%

Volatility

SQY vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax SQ Option Income Strategy ETF (SQY) has a higher volatility of 9.38% compared to Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) at 5.98%. This indicates that SQY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SQYVGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.38%

5.98%

+3.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.72%

15.98%

+14.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.47%

20.52%

+17.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.11%

25.17%

+16.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.11%

24.60%

+17.51%

SQY vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SQY has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

SQY vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

SQY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 103.71%, more than VGT's 0.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SQY
YieldMax SQ Option Income Strategy ETF
103.71%95.35%62.54%9.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.30%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


SQY and VGT have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SQY has higher volatility (9.38%) compared to VGT (5.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SQY dropped -52.30% vs VGT's -54.63%.

On 1-year performance, VGT leads with 65.14% vs 7.17% for SQY. On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VGT has been the lower-risk option at 5.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, VGT has performed better with a 65.14% return vs 7.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for SQY.

SQY has the higher dividend yield at 103.71%, compared with 0.30% for VGT.

SQY is categorized as Derivative Income, while VGT is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for SQY and 0.09% for VGT.

VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs 0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SQY and VGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer