PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SQY vs. MSTY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SQY vs. MSTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax SQ Option Income Strategy ETF (SQY) and YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SQY achieves a 4.45% return, which is significantly higher than MSTY's -8.55% return.


SQY

1D
-1.63%
1M
0.60%
YTD
4.45%
6M
14.28%
1Y
7.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MSTY

1D
-8.50%
1M
-20.82%
YTD
-8.55%
6M
-19.25%
1Y
-57.30%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SQY vs. MSTY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SQY
YieldMax SQ Option Income Strategy ETF
4.45%-29.43%37.76%
MSTY
YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF
-8.55%-42.71%200.20%

Correlation

The correlation between SQY and MSTY is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2024

0.41

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SQY vs. MSTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SQY
SQY Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
SQY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SQY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
SQY Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
SQY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
SQY Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

MSTY
MSTY Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
MSTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTY Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTY Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SQY vs. MSTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax SQ Option Income Strategy ETF (SQY) and YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SQYMSTYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.19

-0.96

+1.14

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.51

-1.53

+2.05

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

0.83

+0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.19

-0.79

+0.98

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.41

-1.22

+1.63

SQY vs. MSTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SQY Sharpe Ratio is 0.19, which is higher than the MSTY Sharpe Ratio of -0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SQY and MSTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SQYMSTYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

-0.96

+1.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.31

-0.06

Drawdowns

SQY vs. MSTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SQY drawdown since its inception was -52.30%, smaller than the maximum MSTY drawdown of -71.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SQY and MSTY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SQYMSTYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.30%

-71.79%

+19.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.72%

-71.79%

+34.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.42%

-64.04%

+29.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.80%

-26.01%

+4.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.14%

46.68%

-29.54%

Volatility

SQY vs. MSTY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax SQ Option Income Strategy ETF (SQY) is 9.38%, while YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY) has a volatility of 16.65%. This indicates that SQY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SQYMSTYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.38%

16.65%

-7.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.72%

48.38%

-17.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.47%

60.11%

-21.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.11%

71.83%

-29.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.11%

71.83%

-29.72%

SQY vs. MSTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

SQY has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than MSTY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

SQY vs. MSTY - Dividend Comparison

SQY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 103.71%, less than MSTY's 251.24% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
MSTY
YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF
251.24%294.61%104.56%0.00%
SQY
YieldMax SQ Option Income Strategy ETF
103.71%95.35%62.54%9.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


SQY and MSTY have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSTY has higher volatility (16.65%) compared to SQY (9.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SQY dropped -52.30% vs MSTY's -71.79%.

On 1-year performance, SQY leads with 7.17% vs -57.30% for MSTY. On fees, MSTY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, SQY has been the lower-risk option at 9.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SQY has performed better with a 7.17% return vs -57.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MSTY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for SQY.

MSTY has the higher dividend yield at 251.24%, compared with 103.71% for SQY.

Their fees differ too: 1.01% for SQY and 0.99% for MSTY.

SQY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.19 vs -0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SQY and MSTY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer