SQY vs. GDXY
SQY (YieldMax SQ Option Income Strategy ETF) and GDXY (YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SQY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while GDXY is a Gold fund actively managed by YieldMax. Both are actively managed. SQY charges 1.01%/yr vs 1.08%/yr for GDXY.
Performance
SQY vs. GDXY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SQY
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GDXY
- 1D
- -4.14%
- 1M
- -9.62%
- YTD
- -15.78%
- 6M
- -19.56%
- 1Y
- 17.53%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SQY vs. GDXY — Risk / Return Rank
SQY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GDXY
SQY vs. GDXY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax SQ Option Income Strategy ETF (SQY) and YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF (GDXY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SQY | GDXY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.11 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.52 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.37 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SQY vs. GDXY - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SQY | GDXY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -34.16% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -34.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -32.39% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -6.97% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 12.81% | — |
Volatility
SQY vs. GDXY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SQY | GDXY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 14.40% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 33.29% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 38.62% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 32.58% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 32.58% | — |
SQY vs. GDXY - Expense Ratio Comparison
SQY has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is lower than GDXY's 1.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
SQY vs. GDXY - Dividend Comparison
SQY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GDXY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 78.76%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
GDXY YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF | 78.76% | 52.13% | 23.91% |
SQY YieldMax SQ Option Income Strategy ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, SQY is cheaper at 1.01% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SQY is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for GDXY.
GDXY has the higher dividend yield at 78.76%, compared with 0.00% for SQY.
SQY is categorized as Derivative Income, while GDXY is Gold. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for SQY and 1.08% for GDXY.
Find the right allocation for SQY and GDXY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer