SQY vs. BITO
SQY (YieldMax SQ Option Income Strategy ETF) and BITO (ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SQY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while BITO is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by ProShares. Both are actively managed. SQY charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BITO.
Performance
SQY vs. BITO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SQY
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BITO
- 1D
- -3.31%
- 1M
- -18.05%
- YTD
- -29.93%
- 6M
- -30.03%
- 1Y
- -42.09%
- 3Y*
- 18.00%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SQY vs. BITO — Risk / Return Rank
SQY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BITO
SQY vs. BITO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax SQ Option Income Strategy ETF (SQY) and ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SQY | BITO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.85 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.80 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.35 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SQY vs. BITO - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SQY | BITO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -77.86% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -53.10% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -53.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -51.67% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -36.86% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 31.28% | — |
Volatility
SQY vs. BITO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SQY | BITO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 12.79% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 34.39% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 44.08% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 55.02% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 55.02% | — |
SQY vs. BITO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SQY has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than BITO's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
SQY vs. BITO - Dividend Comparison
SQY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BITO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 71.07%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BITO ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF | 71.07% | 78.29% | 61.59% | 15.14% |
SQY YieldMax SQ Option Income Strategy ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, BITO is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BITO is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for SQY.
BITO has the higher dividend yield at 71.07%, compared with 0.00% for SQY.
SQY is categorized as Derivative Income, while BITO is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for SQY and 0.95% for BITO.
Find the right allocation for SQY and BITO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer