SQY vs. BITO
SQY (YieldMax SQ Option Income Strategy ETF) and BITO (ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SQY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while BITO is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by ProShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SQY returned -0.20% vs -41.01% for BITO. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SQY charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BITO.
Performance
SQY vs. BITO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SQY achieves a -1.01% return, which is significantly higher than BITO's -26.37% return.
SQY
- 1D
- -5.22%
- 1M
- -4.39%
- YTD
- -1.01%
- 6M
- 6.08%
- 1Y
- -0.20%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BITO
- 1D
- -2.94%
- 1M
- -18.61%
- YTD
- -26.37%
- 6M
- -30.81%
- 1Y
- -41.01%
- 3Y*
- 25.27%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SQY vs. BITO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SQY YieldMax SQ Option Income Strategy ETF | -1.01% | -29.43% | 21.72% | 44.45% |
BITO ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF | -26.37% | -11.19% | 104.45% | 53.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between SQY and BITO is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2023 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SQY vs. BITO — Risk / Return Rank
SQY
BITO
SQY vs. BITO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax SQ Option Income Strategy ETF (SQY) and ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SQY | BITO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | -0.95 | +0.94 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.26 | -1.35 | +1.61 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 0.85 | +0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.01 | -0.82 | +0.82 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.01 | -1.41 | +1.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SQY | BITO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 | -0.95 | +0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | -0.09 | +0.28 |
Drawdowns
SQY vs. BITO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SQY drawdown since its inception was -52.30%, smaller than the maximum BITO drawdown of -77.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SQY and BITO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SQY | BITO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.30% | -77.86% | +25.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.72% | -50.05% | +12.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -50.05% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.84% | -49.22% | +11.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.82% | -36.73% | +14.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.18% | 29.09% | -11.91% |
Volatility
SQY vs. BITO - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax SQ Option Income Strategy ETF (SQY) has a higher volatility of 10.82% compared to ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) at 9.43%. This indicates that SQY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BITO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SQY | BITO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.82% | 9.43% | +1.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.08% | 34.26% | -3.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.83% | 43.57% | -4.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.20% | 55.11% | -12.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.20% | 55.11% | -12.91% |
SQY vs. BITO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SQY has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than BITO's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
SQY vs. BITO - Dividend Comparison
SQY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 109.42%, more than BITO's 67.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BITO ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF | 67.63% | 78.29% | 61.59% | 15.14% |
SQY YieldMax SQ Option Income Strategy ETF | 109.42% | 95.35% | 62.54% | 9.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SQY and BITO have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SQY has higher volatility (10.82%) compared to BITO (9.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SQY dropped -52.30% vs BITO's -77.86%.
On 1-year performance, SQY leads with -0.20% vs -41.01% for BITO. On fees, BITO is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, BITO has been the lower-risk option at 9.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SQY has performed better with a -0.20% return vs -41.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BITO is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for SQY.
SQY has the higher dividend yield at 109.42%, compared with 67.63% for BITO.
SQY is categorized as Derivative Income, while BITO is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for SQY and 0.95% for BITO.
SQY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.01 vs -0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SQY and BITO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer