SQY vs. NVDY
SQY (YieldMax SQ Option Income Strategy ETF) and NVDY (YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from YieldMax. Both are actively managed. SQY charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for NVDY.
Performance
SQY vs. NVDY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SQY
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVDY
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- -5.66%
- YTD
- 6.53%
- 6M
- 5.92%
- 1Y
- 31.11%
- 3Y*
- 50.35%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SQY vs. NVDY — Risk / Return Rank
SQY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
NVDY
SQY vs. NVDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax SQ Option Income Strategy ETF (SQY) and YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (NVDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SQY | NVDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.20 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.44 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.50 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SQY vs. NVDY - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SQY | NVDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -34.08% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -34.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -12.05% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -6.20% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.67% | — |
Volatility
SQY vs. NVDY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SQY | NVDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 10.03% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 21.44% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 28.33% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 38.17% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 38.17% | — |
SQY vs. NVDY - Expense Ratio Comparison
SQY has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDY's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
SQY vs. NVDY - Dividend Comparison
SQY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 64.61%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NVDY YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF | 64.61% | 83.10% | 83.65% | 22.32% |
SQY YieldMax SQ Option Income Strategy ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, NVDY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NVDY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for SQY.
NVDY has the higher dividend yield at 64.61%, compared with 0.00% for SQY.
Their fees differ too: 1.01% for SQY and 0.99% for NVDY.
Find the right allocation for SQY and NVDY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer