SQY vs. QQQI
SQY (YieldMax SQ Option Income Strategy ETF) and QQQI (NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SQY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while QQQI is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Neos. Both are actively managed. SQY charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for QQQI.
Performance
SQY vs. QQQI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SQY
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQI
- 1D
- -1.58%
- 1M
- -2.07%
- 6M
- 8.49%
- YTD
- 9.56%
- 1Y
- 20.53%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SQY vs. QQQI — Risk / Return Rank
SQY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QQQI
SQY vs. QQQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax SQ Option Income Strategy ETF (SQY) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SQY | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.25 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.15 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.80 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SQY vs. QQQI - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SQY | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -20.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -3.58% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -2.21% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.34% | — |
Volatility
SQY vs. QQQI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SQY | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.52% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.89% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 15.53% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 17.60% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 17.60% | — |
SQY vs. QQQI - Expense Ratio Comparison
SQY has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQI's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
SQY vs. QQQI - Dividend Comparison
SQY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.87%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 13.87% | 13.82% | 12.85% |
SQY YieldMax SQ Option Income Strategy ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, QQQI is cheaper at 0.68% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QQQI is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for SQY.
QQQI has the higher dividend yield at 13.87%, compared with 0.00% for SQY.
SQY is categorized as Derivative Income, while QQQI is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Neos. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for SQY and 0.68% for QQQI.
Find the right allocation for SQY and QQQI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer