SPYV vs. SPDW
SPYV (SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF) and SPDW (SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPYV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Value Index, while SPDW is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the S&P Developed Ex-U.S. BMI Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPYV returned 12.08%/yr vs 10.64%/yr for SPDW. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.04% expense ratio.
Performance
SPYV vs. SPDW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPYV achieves a 8.25% return, which is significantly lower than SPDW's 14.86% return. Over the past 10 years, SPYV has outperformed SPDW with an annualized return of 12.08%, while SPDW has yielded a comparatively lower 10.64% annualized return.
SPYV
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- 1.59%
- YTD
- 8.25%
- 6M
- 8.02%
- 1Y
- 21.87%
- 3Y*
- 15.13%
- 5Y*
- 10.98%
- 10Y*
- 12.08%
SPDW
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- 1.53%
- YTD
- 14.86%
- 6M
- 16.65%
- 1Y
- 31.27%
- 3Y*
- 19.01%
- 5Y*
- 9.30%
- 10Y*
- 10.64%
SPYV vs. SPDW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYV SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF | 8.25% | 13.18% | 12.24% | 22.20% | -5.28% | 24.91% | 1.38% | 31.70% | -9.01% | 15.40% |
SPDW SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF | 14.86% | 34.75% | 3.55% | 17.81% | -15.98% | 11.45% | 9.90% | 22.41% | -14.22% | 25.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPYV and SPDW is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 26, 2007 | 0.76 |
The correlation between SPYV and SPDW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPYV vs. SPDW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPYV
SPDW
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Communication Services
Technology
SPYV
SPDW
Financial Services
SPYV
SPDW
Healthcare
SPYV
SPDW
Consumer Cyclical
SPYV
SPDW
Industrials
SPYV
SPDW
Consumer Defensive
SPYV
SPDW
Energy
SPYV
SPDW
Utilities
SPYV
SPDW
Basic Materials
SPYV
SPDW
Real Estate
SPYV
SPDW
Communication Services
SPYV
SPDW
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPYV vs. SPDW — Risk / Return Rank
SPYV
SPDW
SPYV vs. SPDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) and SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPYV | SPDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.33 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.33 | 2.58 | +0.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.73 | 9.95 | +2.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPYV vs. SPDW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPYV drawdown since its inception was -58.45%, roughly equal to the maximum SPDW drawdown of -60.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYV and SPDW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPYV | SPDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.45% | -60.02% | +1.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.22% | -11.55% | +5.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.54% | -13.53% | -4.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.89% | -30.21% | +12.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.89% | -34.98% | -1.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.18% | -0.99% | +0.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.71% | -12.89% | +4.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.63% | 2.99% | -1.36% |
Volatility
SPYV vs. SPDW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) is 2.70%, while SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW) has a volatility of 6.86%. This indicates that SPYV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPYV | SPDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.70% | 6.86% | -4.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.26% | 14.23% | -6.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.97% | 16.51% | -6.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.42% | 16.66% | -2.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.94% | 17.31% | -0.37% |
SPYV vs. SPDW - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SPYV and SPDW have an expense ratio of 0.04%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPYV vs. SPDW - Dividend Comparison
SPYV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, less than SPDW's 2.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPDW SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF | 2.87% | 3.30% | 3.19% | 2.75% | 3.12% | 3.04% | 1.87% | 3.13% | 3.08% | 1.86% | 3.11% | 2.78% |
SPYV SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF | 1.68% | 1.77% | 2.29% | 1.75% | 2.22% | 2.10% | 2.38% | 2.25% | 2.97% | 2.77% | 2.39% | 2.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPYV and SPDW have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPDW has higher volatility (6.86%) compared to SPYV (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYV dropped -58.45% vs SPDW's -60.02%.
On 10-year performance, SPYV leads with 12.08% vs 10.64% for SPDW. Both ETFs have the same 0.04% expense ratio. On volatility, SPYV has been the lower-risk option at 2.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPYV has performed better with a 12.08% return vs 10.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYV and SPDW have the same expense ratio: 0.04% per year.
SPDW has the higher dividend yield at 2.87%, compared with 1.68% for SPYV.
SPYV is categorized as S&P 500, while SPDW is Foreign Large Cap Equities. SPYV tracks S&P 500 Value Index, while SPDW tracks S&P Developed Ex-U.S. BMI Index.
SPYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPYV and SPDW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer