SPYV vs. SPHQ
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) and Invesco S&P 500® Quality ETF (SPHQ).
SPYV and SPHQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SPYV is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Value. It was launched on Sep 25, 2000. SPHQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 High Quality Rankings Index. It was launched on Dec 6, 2005. Both SPYV and SPHQ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SPYV or SPHQ.
Key characteristics
| SPYV | SPHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 14.60% | 24.75% |
| 1Y Return | 33.67% | 39.82% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 11.23% | 10.84% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 12.49% | 16.13% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 10.50% | 13.48% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 3.47 | 3.45 |
| Sortino Ratio | 4.85 | 4.75 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.64 | 1.63 |
| Calmar Ratio | 3.67 | 5.49 |
| Martin Ratio | 21.68 | 26.95 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.64% | 1.53% |
| Daily Std Dev | 10.24% | 11.95% |
| Max Drawdown | -58.45% | -57.83% |
| Current Drawdown | -2.38% | -1.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPYV and SPHQ is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
SPYV vs. SPHQ - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, SPYV achieves a 14.60% return, which is significantly lower than SPHQ's 24.75% return. Over the past 10 years, SPYV has underperformed SPHQ with an annualized return of 10.50%, while SPHQ has yielded a comparatively higher 13.48% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SPYV vs. SPHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPYV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than SPHQ's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SPYV vs. SPHQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) and Invesco S&P 500® Quality ETF (SPHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SPYV vs. SPHQ - Dividend Comparison
SPYV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, more than SPHQ's 1.16% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYV SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF | 2.00% | 1.75% | 2.22% | 2.10% | 2.38% | 2.25% | 2.97% | 2.77% | 2.39% | 2.53% | 2.19% | 1.96% |
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500® Quality ETF | 1.16% | 1.42% | 1.85% | 1.19% | 1.55% | 1.51% | 1.85% | 1.57% | 1.67% | 2.29% | 1.66% | 1.99% |
Drawdowns
SPYV vs. SPHQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPYV drawdown since its inception was -58.45%, roughly equal to the maximum SPHQ drawdown of -57.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYV and SPHQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SPYV vs. SPHQ - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) and Invesco S&P 500® Quality ETF (SPHQ) have volatilities of 2.68% and 2.81%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.