SPYV vs. VTV
SPYV (SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF) and VTV (Vanguard Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPYV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Value Index, while VTV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPYV returned 12.14%/yr vs 13.01%/yr for VTV. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.04% expense ratio.
Performance
SPYV vs. VTV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPYV achieves a 7.78% return, which is significantly lower than VTV's 15.12% return. Over the past 10 years, SPYV has underperformed VTV with an annualized return of 12.14%, while VTV has yielded a comparatively higher 13.01% annualized return.
SPYV
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -0.13%
- YTD
- 7.78%
- 6M
- 7.25%
- 1Y
- 21.31%
- 3Y*
- 15.28%
- 5Y*
- 11.43%
- 10Y*
- 12.14%
VTV
- 1D
- 0.99%
- 1M
- 3.67%
- YTD
- 15.12%
- 6M
- 14.64%
- 1Y
- 28.84%
- 3Y*
- 18.88%
- 5Y*
- 12.52%
- 10Y*
- 13.01%
SPYV vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYV SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF | 7.78% | 13.18% | 12.24% | 22.20% | -5.28% | 24.91% | 1.38% | 31.70% | -9.01% | 15.40% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 15.12% | 15.27% | 15.95% | 9.32% | -2.09% | 26.53% | 2.33% | 25.66% | -5.47% | 17.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPYV and VTV is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004 | 0.94 |
The correlation between SPYV and VTV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPYV vs. VTV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPYV
VTV
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Technology
SPYV
VTV
Financial Services
SPYV
VTV
Healthcare
SPYV
VTV
Consumer Cyclical
SPYV
VTV
Industrials
SPYV
VTV
Consumer Defensive
SPYV
VTV
Energy
SPYV
VTV
Utilities
SPYV
VTV
Real Estate
SPYV
VTV
Basic Materials
SPYV
VTV
Communication Services
SPYV
VTV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPYV vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank
SPYV
VTV
SPYV vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPYV | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.50 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.44 | 4.56 | -1.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.11 | 17.20 | -4.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPYV vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPYV drawdown since its inception was -58.45%, roughly equal to the maximum VTV drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYV and VTV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPYV | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.45% | -59.27% | +0.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.22% | -6.35% | +0.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.54% | -14.52% | -3.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.89% | -17.04% | -0.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.89% | -36.78% | -0.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.96% | 0.00% | -0.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.70% | -7.85% | -0.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.63% | 1.68% | -0.05% |
Volatility
SPYV vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) is 2.88%, while Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) has a volatility of 3.32%. This indicates that SPYV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPYV | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.88% | 3.32% | -0.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.32% | 7.82% | -0.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.98% | 10.39% | -0.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.38% | 13.88% | +0.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.95% | 16.69% | +0.26% |
SPYV vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SPYV and VTV have an expense ratio of 0.04%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPYV vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison
SPYV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, more than VTV's 1.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYV SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF | 2.14% | 1.77% | 2.29% | 1.75% | 2.22% | 2.10% | 2.38% | 2.25% | 2.97% | 2.77% | 2.39% | 2.53% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 1.82% | 2.05% | 2.31% | 2.46% | 2.52% | 2.15% | 2.56% | 2.50% | 2.73% | 2.29% | 2.44% | 2.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, SPYV and VTV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VTV has higher volatility (3.32%) compared to SPYV (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYV dropped -58.45% vs VTV's -59.27%.
On 10-year performance, VTV leads with 13.01% vs 12.14% for SPYV. Both ETFs have the same 0.04% expense ratio. On volatility, SPYV has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VTV has performed better with a 13.01% return vs 12.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYV and VTV have the same expense ratio: 0.04% per year.
SPYV has the higher dividend yield at 2.14%, compared with 1.82% for VTV.
SPYV is categorized as S&P 500, while VTV is Large Cap Value Equities. SPYV tracks S&P 500 Value Index, while VTV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard.
VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPYV and VTV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer