SPYV vs. SPYG
SPYV (SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF) and SPYG (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF) are both S&P 500 funds from State Street - SPYV tracks the S&P 500 Value Index while SPYG tracks the S&P 500 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPYV returned 12.14%/yr vs 18.34%/yr for SPYG. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.04% expense ratio.
Performance
SPYV vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPYV achieves a 7.78% return, which is significantly lower than SPYG's 11.38% return. Over the past 10 years, SPYV has underperformed SPYG with an annualized return of 12.14%, while SPYG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.34% annualized return.
SPYV
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -0.13%
- YTD
- 7.78%
- 6M
- 7.25%
- 1Y
- 21.31%
- 3Y*
- 15.28%
- 5Y*
- 11.43%
- 10Y*
- 12.14%
SPYG
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 11.38%
- 6M
- 11.00%
- 1Y
- 31.61%
- 3Y*
- 26.51%
- 5Y*
- 14.78%
- 10Y*
- 18.34%
SPYV vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYV SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF | 7.78% | 13.18% | 12.24% | 22.20% | -5.28% | 24.91% | 1.38% | 31.70% | -9.01% | 15.40% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 11.38% | 22.09% | 35.99% | 30.02% | -29.41% | 32.01% | 33.46% | 30.84% | -0.12% | 27.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPYV and SPYG is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2000 | 0.74 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SPYV and SPYG has dropped to 0.53 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
SPYV vs. SPYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPYV
SPYG
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Technology
SPYV
SPYG
Financial Services
SPYV
SPYG
Healthcare
SPYV
SPYG
Consumer Cyclical
SPYV
SPYG
Industrials
SPYV
SPYG
Consumer Defensive
SPYV
SPYG
Energy
SPYV
SPYG
Utilities
SPYV
SPYG
Real Estate
SPYV
SPYG
Basic Materials
SPYV
SPYG
Communication Services
SPYV
SPYG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPYV vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank
SPYV
SPYG
SPYV vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPYV | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.33 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.44 | 2.31 | +1.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.11 | 9.21 | +3.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPYV vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPYV drawdown since its inception was -58.45%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYV and SPYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPYV | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.45% | -67.63% | +9.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.22% | -13.76% | +7.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.54% | -22.14% | +4.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.89% | -32.67% | +14.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.89% | -32.67% | -4.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.96% | -3.19% | +2.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.70% | -24.28% | +15.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.63% | 3.44% | -1.81% |
Volatility
SPYV vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) is 2.88%, while State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) has a volatility of 6.83%. This indicates that SPYV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPYV | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.88% | 6.83% | -3.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.32% | 13.72% | -6.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.98% | 17.11% | -7.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.38% | 21.34% | -6.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.95% | 20.74% | -3.79% |
SPYV vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SPYV and SPYG have an expense ratio of 0.04%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPYV vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison
SPYV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, more than SPYG's 0.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.49% | 0.52% | 0.60% | 1.15% | 1.03% | 0.62% | 0.90% | 1.37% | 1.51% | 1.41% | 1.55% | 1.57% |
SPYV SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF | 1.72% | 1.77% | 2.29% | 1.75% | 2.22% | 2.10% | 2.38% | 2.25% | 2.97% | 2.77% | 2.39% | 2.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPYV and SPYG have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPYG has higher volatility (6.83%) compared to SPYV (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYV dropped -58.45% vs SPYG's -67.63%.
On 10-year performance, SPYG leads with 18.34% vs 12.14% for SPYV. Both ETFs have the same 0.04% expense ratio. On volatility, SPYV has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPYG has performed better with a 18.34% return vs 12.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYV and SPYG have the same expense ratio: 0.04% per year.
SPYV has the higher dividend yield at 2.14%, compared with 0.60% for SPYG.
SPYV tracks S&P 500 Value Index, while SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index.
SPYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPYV and SPYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer