SPYV vs. IWN
SPYV (SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF) and IWN (iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPYV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Value Index, while IWN is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPYV returned 12.08%/yr vs 10.58%/yr for IWN. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPYV charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for IWN.
Performance
SPYV vs. IWN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPYV achieves a 8.25% return, which is significantly lower than IWN's 20.82% return. Over the past 10 years, SPYV has outperformed IWN with an annualized return of 12.08%, while IWN has yielded a comparatively lower 10.58% annualized return.
SPYV
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- 2.32%
- YTD
- 8.25%
- 6M
- 8.02%
- 1Y
- 21.87%
- 3Y*
- 15.13%
- 5Y*
- 10.98%
- 10Y*
- 12.08%
IWN
- 1D
- 1.17%
- 1M
- 6.00%
- YTD
- 20.82%
- 6M
- 17.48%
- 1Y
- 44.79%
- 3Y*
- 17.41%
- 5Y*
- 6.89%
- 10Y*
- 10.58%
SPYV vs. IWN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYV SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF | 8.25% | 13.18% | 12.24% | 22.20% | -5.28% | 24.91% | 1.38% | 31.70% | -9.01% | 15.40% |
IWN iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF | 20.82% | 12.40% | 7.63% | 14.56% | -14.77% | 27.96% | 4.66% | 22.01% | -13.01% | 7.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPYV and IWN is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2000 | 0.79 |
The correlation between SPYV and IWN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPYV vs. IWN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPYV
IWN
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Technology
SPYV
IWN
Financial Services
SPYV
IWN
Healthcare
SPYV
IWN
Consumer Cyclical
SPYV
IWN
Industrials
SPYV
IWN
Consumer Defensive
SPYV
IWN
Energy
SPYV
IWN
Utilities
SPYV
IWN
Real Estate
SPYV
IWN
Basic Materials
SPYV
IWN
Communication Services
SPYV
IWN
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPYV vs. IWN — Risk / Return Rank
SPYV
IWN
SPYV vs. IWN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) and iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPYV | IWN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.40 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.33 | 5.02 | -1.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.73 | 16.91 | -4.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPYV vs. IWN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPYV drawdown since its inception was -58.45%, smaller than the maximum IWN drawdown of -61.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYV and IWN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPYV | IWN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.45% | -61.55% | +3.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.22% | -8.45% | +2.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.54% | -26.70% | +9.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.89% | -26.70% | +8.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.89% | -46.08% | +9.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.18% | 0.00% | -0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.71% | -10.15% | +1.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.63% | 2.51% | -0.88% |
Volatility
SPYV vs. IWN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) is 2.70%, while iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) has a volatility of 5.80%. This indicates that SPYV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPYV | IWN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.70% | 5.80% | -3.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.26% | 12.25% | -4.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.97% | 18.09% | -8.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.42% | 21.47% | -7.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.94% | 23.41% | -6.47% |
SPYV vs. IWN - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPYV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than IWN's 0.24% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPYV vs. IWN - Dividend Comparison
SPYV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, more than IWN's 1.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWN iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF | 1.42% | 1.70% | 1.80% | 2.04% | 2.12% | 1.48% | 1.60% | 1.92% | 1.99% | 1.78% | 1.74% | 2.15% |
SPYV SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF | 1.68% | 1.77% | 2.29% | 1.75% | 2.22% | 2.10% | 2.38% | 2.25% | 2.97% | 2.77% | 2.39% | 2.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPYV and IWN have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IWN has higher volatility (5.80%) compared to SPYV (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYV dropped -58.45% vs IWN's -61.55%.
On 10-year performance, SPYV leads with 12.08% vs 10.58% for IWN. On fees, SPYV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPYV has been the lower-risk option at 2.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPYV has performed better with a 12.08% return vs 10.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for IWN.
SPYV has the higher dividend yield at 1.68%, compared with 1.42% for IWN.
SPYV is categorized as S&P 500, while IWN is Small Cap Value Equities. SPYV tracks S&P 500 Value Index, while IWN tracks Russell 2000 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SPYV and 0.24% for IWN.
IWN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPYV and IWN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer