SPYG vs. XME
SPYG (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF) and XME (SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPYG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index, while XME is a Materials fund tracking the S&P Metals & Mining Select Industry Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPYG returned 17.91%/yr vs 19.60%/yr for XME. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPYG charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XME.
Performance
SPYG vs. XME - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPYG achieves a 9.70% return, which is significantly lower than XME's 16.32% return. Over the past 10 years, SPYG has underperformed XME with an annualized return of 17.91%, while XME has yielded a comparatively higher 19.60% annualized return.
SPYG
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -2.81%
- YTD
- 9.70%
- 6M
- 10.60%
- 1Y
- 29.17%
- 3Y*
- 25.85%
- 5Y*
- 14.92%
- 10Y*
- 17.91%
XME
- 1D
- 1.77%
- 1M
- -0.44%
- YTD
- 16.32%
- 6M
- 18.13%
- 1Y
- 85.07%
- 3Y*
- 35.23%
- 5Y*
- 21.78%
- 10Y*
- 19.60%
SPYG vs. XME - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 9.70% | 22.09% | 35.99% | 30.02% | -29.41% | 32.01% | 33.46% | 30.84% | -0.12% | 27.24% |
XME SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF | 16.32% | 83.47% | -4.54% | 21.51% | 13.13% | 34.92% | 15.95% | 14.69% | -26.78% | 21.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPYG and XME is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2006 | 0.58 |
The correlation between SPYG and XME has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPYG vs. XME - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPYG
XME
Technology
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Energy
Technology
SPYG
XME
Communication Services
SPYG
XME
-
Consumer Cyclical
SPYG
XME
-
Financial Services
SPYG
XME
-
Healthcare
SPYG
XME
-
Industrials
SPYG
XME
Utilities
SPYG
XME
-
Consumer Defensive
SPYG
XME
Real Estate
SPYG
XME
-
Basic Materials
SPYG
XME
Energy
SPYG
XME
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPYG vs. XME — Risk / Return Rank
SPYG
XME
SPYG vs. XME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) and SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPYG | XME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.37 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.01 | 3.84 | -1.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.08 | 9.58 | -1.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPYG vs. XME - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPYG drawdown since its inception was -67.63%, smaller than the maximum XME drawdown of -85.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYG and XME.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPYG | XME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.63% | -85.89% | +18.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.76% | -22.60% | +8.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.14% | -30.47% | +8.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.67% | -37.27% | +4.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.67% | -61.69% | +29.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.65% | -9.33% | +4.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.30% | -44.09% | +19.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.42% | 9.05% | -5.63% |
Volatility
SPYG vs. XME - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) is 6.33%, while SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) has a volatility of 15.26%. This indicates that SPYG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPYG | XME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.33% | 15.26% | -8.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.48% | 28.51% | -15.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.81% | 36.11% | -19.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.27% | 32.84% | -11.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.70% | 32.96% | -12.26% |
SPYG vs. XME - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPYG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than XME's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPYG vs. XME - Dividend Comparison
SPYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, more than XME's 0.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.48% | 0.52% | 0.60% | 1.15% | 1.03% | 0.62% | 0.90% | 1.37% | 1.51% | 1.41% | 1.55% | 1.57% |
XME SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF | 0.32% | 0.38% | 0.65% | 1.00% | 1.64% | 0.70% | 0.99% | 2.43% | 2.23% | 1.15% | 1.02% | 2.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPYG and XME have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XME has higher volatility (15.26%) compared to SPYG (6.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYG dropped -67.63% vs XME's -85.89%.
On 10-year performance, XME leads with 19.60% vs 17.91% for SPYG. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPYG has been the lower-risk option at 6.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XME has performed better with a 19.60% return vs 17.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XME.
SPYG has the higher dividend yield at 0.48%, compared with 0.32% for XME.
SPYG is categorized as S&P 500, while XME is Materials. SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index, while XME tracks S&P Metals & Mining Select Industry Index. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SPYG and 0.35% for XME.
XME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPYG and XME
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer