PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPYG vs. XME
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPYG vs. XME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) and SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYG achieves a 9.70% return, which is significantly lower than XME's 16.32% return. Over the past 10 years, SPYG has underperformed XME with an annualized return of 17.91%, while XME has yielded a comparatively higher 19.60% annualized return.


SPYG

1D
0.41%
1M
-2.81%
YTD
9.70%
6M
10.60%
1Y
29.17%
3Y*
25.85%
5Y*
14.92%
10Y*
17.91%

XME

1D
1.77%
1M
-0.44%
YTD
16.32%
6M
18.13%
1Y
85.07%
3Y*
35.23%
5Y*
21.78%
10Y*
19.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPYG vs. XME - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
9.70%22.09%35.99%30.02%-29.41%32.01%33.46%30.84%-0.12%27.24%
XME
SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF
16.32%83.47%-4.54%21.51%13.13%34.92%15.95%14.69%-26.78%21.17%

Correlation

The correlation between SPYG and XME is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2006

0.58

The correlation between SPYG and XME has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPYG vs. XME - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPYG
XME

Technology

53.2%
2.2%

Communication Services

16.1%

-

Consumer Cyclical

8.5%

-

Financial Services

8.4%

-

Healthcare

5.8%

-

Industrials

5.1%
0.4%

Utilities

1.1%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.9%
0.8%

Real Estate

0.5%

-

Basic Materials

0.3%
74.9%

Energy

0.1%
23.8%

Technology

SPYG
53.2%
XME
2.2%

Communication Services

SPYG
16.1%
XME

-

Consumer Cyclical

SPYG
8.5%
XME

-

Financial Services

SPYG
8.4%
XME

-

Healthcare

SPYG
5.8%
XME

-

Industrials

SPYG
5.1%
XME
0.4%

Utilities

SPYG
1.1%
XME

-

Consumer Defensive

SPYG
0.9%
XME
0.8%

Real Estate

SPYG
0.5%
XME

-

Basic Materials

SPYG
0.3%
XME
74.9%

Energy

SPYG
0.1%
XME
23.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPYG vs. XME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPYG
SPYG Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
SPYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYG Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYG Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

XME
XME Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
XME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XME Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
XME Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
XME Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
XME Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPYG vs. XME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) and SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPYGXMEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.37

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

3.84

-1.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.08

9.58

-1.49

SPYG vs. XME - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYG Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is lower than the XME Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYG and XME, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPYG vs. XME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYG drawdown since its inception was -67.63%, smaller than the maximum XME drawdown of -85.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYG and XME.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPYGXMEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.63%

-85.89%

+18.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.76%

-22.60%

+8.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.14%

-30.47%

+8.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.67%

-37.27%

+4.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.67%

-61.69%

+29.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.65%

-9.33%

+4.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.30%

-44.09%

+19.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.42%

9.05%

-5.63%

Volatility

SPYG vs. XME - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) is 6.33%, while SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) has a volatility of 15.26%. This indicates that SPYG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPYGXMEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.33%

15.26%

-8.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.48%

28.51%

-15.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.81%

36.11%

-19.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.27%

32.84%

-11.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.70%

32.96%

-12.26%

SPYG vs. XME - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than XME's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPYG vs. XME - Dividend Comparison

SPYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, more than XME's 0.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.48%0.52%0.60%1.15%1.03%0.62%0.90%1.37%1.51%1.41%1.55%1.57%
XME
SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF
0.32%0.38%0.65%1.00%1.64%0.70%0.99%2.43%2.23%1.15%1.02%2.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPYG and XME have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XME has higher volatility (15.26%) compared to SPYG (6.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYG dropped -67.63% vs XME's -85.89%.

On 10-year performance, XME leads with 19.60% vs 17.91% for SPYG. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPYG has been the lower-risk option at 6.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XME has performed better with a 19.60% return vs 17.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XME.

SPYG has the higher dividend yield at 0.48%, compared with 0.32% for XME.

SPYG is categorized as S&P 500, while XME is Materials. SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index, while XME tracks S&P Metals & Mining Select Industry Index. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SPYG and 0.35% for XME.

XME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPYG and XME

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer