PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPYG vs. SLYV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPYG vs. SLYV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYG achieves a 9.70% return, which is significantly lower than SLYV's 19.47% return. Over the past 10 years, SPYG has outperformed SLYV with an annualized return of 17.91%, while SLYV has yielded a comparatively lower 10.65% annualized return.


SPYG

1D
0.41%
1M
-2.81%
YTD
9.70%
6M
10.60%
1Y
29.17%
3Y*
25.85%
5Y*
14.92%
10Y*
17.91%

SLYV

1D
1.09%
1M
6.39%
YTD
19.47%
6M
16.63%
1Y
41.92%
3Y*
14.32%
5Y*
6.28%
10Y*
10.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPYG vs. SLYV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
9.70%22.09%35.99%30.02%-29.41%32.01%33.46%30.84%-0.12%27.24%
SLYV
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF
19.47%6.54%7.28%14.82%-11.08%30.57%2.68%24.26%-12.77%11.74%

Correlation

The correlation between SPYG and SLYV is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2000

0.69

The correlation between SPYG and SLYV shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.69 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPYG vs. SLYV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPYG
SLYV

Technology

53.2%
13.4%

Communication Services

16.1%
4.4%

Consumer Cyclical

8.5%
15.4%

Financial Services

8.4%
19.5%

Healthcare

5.8%
7.3%

Industrials

5.1%
11.6%

Utilities

1.1%
2.1%

Consumer Defensive

0.9%
3.8%

Real Estate

0.5%
8.6%

Basic Materials

0.3%
6.9%

Energy

0.1%
7.0%

Technology

SPYG
53.2%
SLYV
13.4%

Communication Services

SPYG
16.1%
SLYV
4.4%

Consumer Cyclical

SPYG
8.5%
SLYV
15.4%

Financial Services

SPYG
8.4%
SLYV
19.5%

Healthcare

SPYG
5.8%
SLYV
7.3%

Industrials

SPYG
5.1%
SLYV
11.6%

Utilities

SPYG
1.1%
SLYV
2.1%

Consumer Defensive

SPYG
0.9%
SLYV
3.8%

Real Estate

SPYG
0.5%
SLYV
8.6%

Basic Materials

SPYG
0.3%
SLYV
6.9%

Energy

SPYG
0.1%
SLYV
7.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPYG vs. SLYV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPYG
SPYG Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
SPYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYG Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYG Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

SLYV
SLYV Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
SLYV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLYV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLYV Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
SLYV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLYV Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPYG vs. SLYV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPYGSLYVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.37

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

4.20

-2.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.08

13.96

-5.87

SPYG vs. SLYV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYG Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the SLYV Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYG and SLYV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPYG vs. SLYV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYG drawdown since its inception was -67.63%, which is greater than SLYV's maximum drawdown of -61.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYG and SLYV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPYGSLYVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.63%

-61.15%

-6.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.76%

-9.36%

-4.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.14%

-28.68%

+6.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.67%

-28.68%

-3.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.67%

-47.73%

+15.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.65%

0.00%

-4.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.30%

-8.93%

-15.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.42%

2.82%

+0.60%

Volatility

SPYG vs. SLYV - Volatility Comparison

State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) has a higher volatility of 6.33% compared to SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) at 4.81%. This indicates that SPYG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLYV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPYGSLYVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.33%

4.81%

+1.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.48%

11.59%

+1.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.81%

18.31%

-1.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.27%

21.97%

-0.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.70%

23.96%

-3.26%

SPYG vs. SLYV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than SLYV's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPYG vs. SLYV - Dividend Comparison

SPYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, less than SLYV's 1.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SLYV
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF
1.75%2.02%2.30%2.11%1.47%1.94%1.40%1.67%2.14%5.53%2.18%6.55%
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.48%0.52%0.60%1.15%1.03%0.62%0.90%1.37%1.51%1.41%1.55%1.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPYG and SLYV have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPYG has higher volatility (6.33%) compared to SLYV (4.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYG dropped -67.63% vs SLYV's -61.15%.

On 10-year performance, SPYG leads with 17.91% vs 10.65% for SLYV. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SLYV has been the lower-risk option at 4.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPYG has performed better with a 17.91% return vs 10.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SLYV.

SLYV has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 0.48% for SPYG.

SPYG is categorized as S&P 500, while SLYV is Small Cap Value Equities. SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index, while SLYV tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SPYG and 0.15% for SLYV.

SLYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPYG and SLYV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer