PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPXE vs. NOBL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPXE vs. NOBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Energy ETF (SPXE) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPXE achieves a 10.29% return, which is significantly higher than NOBL's 3.51% return. Over the past 10 years, SPXE has outperformed NOBL with an annualized return of 15.72%, while NOBL has yielded a comparatively lower 9.51% annualized return.


SPXE

1D
-0.72%
1M
5.33%
YTD
10.29%
6M
10.47%
1Y
27.46%
3Y*
22.55%
5Y*
13.56%
10Y*
15.72%

NOBL

1D
-0.17%
1M
1.01%
YTD
3.51%
6M
3.45%
1Y
9.00%
3Y*
8.01%
5Y*
5.03%
10Y*
9.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPXE vs. NOBL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPXE
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Energy ETF
10.29%18.03%25.72%27.71%-20.58%27.93%20.62%32.45%-5.52%24.99%
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
3.51%6.84%6.72%8.09%-6.52%25.46%8.35%27.39%-3.26%21.02%

Correlation

The correlation between SPXE and NOBL is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2015

0.65

Over the past year, the correlation between SPXE and NOBL has dropped to 0.42 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

SPXE vs. NOBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPXE
NOBL

Technology

39.6%
3.6%

Financial Services

11.6%
12.4%

Communication Services

11.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
5.1%

Healthcare

8.6%
9.7%

Industrials

7.9%
20.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
23.5%

Utilities

2.7%
6.4%

Real Estate

1.9%
4.6%

Basic Materials

1.8%
10.9%

Energy

0.0%
3.4%

Technology

SPXE
39.6%
NOBL
3.6%

Financial Services

SPXE
11.6%
NOBL
12.4%

Communication Services

SPXE
11.0%
NOBL

-

Consumer Cyclical

SPXE
10.1%
NOBL
5.1%

Healthcare

SPXE
8.6%
NOBL
9.7%

Industrials

SPXE
7.9%
NOBL
20.3%

Consumer Defensive

SPXE
4.7%
NOBL
23.5%

Utilities

SPXE
2.7%
NOBL
6.4%

Real Estate

SPXE
1.9%
NOBL
4.6%

Basic Materials

SPXE
1.8%
NOBL
10.9%

Energy

SPXE
0.0%
NOBL
3.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPXE vs. NOBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPXE
SPXE Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
SPXE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXE Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXE Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

NOBL
NOBL Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
NOBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOBL Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
NOBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOBL Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPXE vs. NOBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Energy ETF (SPXE) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPXENOBLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.14

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.73

0.99

+1.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.40

2.58

+9.82

SPXE vs. NOBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPXE Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is higher than the NOBL Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPXE and NOBL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPXENOBLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.22

0.80

+1.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.35

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

0.57

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

0.64

+0.26

Drawdowns

SPXE vs. NOBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPXE drawdown since its inception was -32.27%, smaller than the maximum NOBL drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXE and NOBL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPXENOBLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.27%

-35.43%

+3.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.09%

-9.11%

-0.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.90%

-15.36%

-3.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.50%

-17.92%

-8.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.27%

-35.43%

+3.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.72%

-5.99%

+5.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.47%

-3.48%

-0.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.22%

3.50%

-1.28%

Volatility

SPXE vs. NOBL - Volatility Comparison

ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Energy ETF (SPXE) has a higher volatility of 3.20% compared to ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) at 2.36%. This indicates that SPXE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPXENOBLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.20%

2.36%

+0.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.61%

8.00%

+1.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.45%

11.33%

+1.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.91%

14.38%

+2.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.42%

16.60%

+0.82%

SPXE vs. NOBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPXE has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than NOBL's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPXE vs. NOBL - Dividend Comparison

SPXE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than NOBL's 2.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
2.12%2.14%2.05%2.09%1.94%1.89%2.14%1.89%2.37%1.74%2.13%2.02%
SPXE
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Energy ETF
0.91%0.99%1.09%1.29%1.49%0.94%1.16%1.38%1.61%1.65%1.53%0.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPXE and NOBL have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPXE has higher volatility (3.20%) compared to NOBL (2.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPXE dropped -32.27% vs NOBL's -35.43%.

On 10-year performance, SPXE leads with 15.72% vs 9.51% for NOBL. On fees, SPXE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, NOBL has been the lower-risk option at 2.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPXE has performed better with a 15.72% return vs 9.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPXE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for NOBL.

NOBL has the higher dividend yield at 2.12%, compared with 0.91% for SPXE.

SPXE tracks S&P 500 Ex-Energy Index, while NOBL tracks S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for SPXE and 0.35% for NOBL.

SPXE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPXE and NOBL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer