PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPUU vs. MVV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPUU vs. MVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF (SPUU) and ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPUU achieves a 19.44% return, which is significantly lower than MVV's 29.43% return. Over the past 10 years, SPUU has outperformed MVV with an annualized return of 25.04%, while MVV has yielded a comparatively lower 14.27% annualized return.


SPUU

1D
3.36%
1M
3.66%
YTD
19.44%
6M
19.99%
1Y
52.90%
3Y*
35.39%
5Y*
20.14%
10Y*
25.04%

MVV

1D
0.68%
1M
10.84%
YTD
29.43%
6M
26.21%
1Y
52.14%
3Y*
20.94%
5Y*
7.54%
10Y*
14.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPUU vs. MVV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPUU
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF
19.44%26.55%44.25%47.28%-38.72%61.27%21.85%66.84%-14.59%44.33%
MVV
ProShares Ultra Midcap 400
29.43%3.48%17.75%22.51%-31.96%48.57%6.20%49.50%-25.44%30.81%

Correlation

The correlation between SPUU and MVV is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2014

0.83

The correlation between SPUU and MVV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPUU vs. MVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPUU
MVV

Technology

39.0%
17.8%

Financial Services

11.1%
13.7%

Communication Services

10.6%
1.0%

Consumer Cyclical

9.9%
10.5%

Healthcare

8.3%
9.1%

Industrials

7.8%
24.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
3.3%

Energy

3.1%
4.9%

Utilities

2.1%
2.9%

Real Estate

1.8%
7.3%

Basic Materials

1.7%
4.8%

Technology

SPUU
39.0%
MVV
17.8%

Financial Services

SPUU
11.1%
MVV
13.7%

Communication Services

SPUU
10.6%
MVV
1.0%

Consumer Cyclical

SPUU
9.9%
MVV
10.5%

Healthcare

SPUU
8.3%
MVV
9.1%

Industrials

SPUU
7.8%
MVV
24.8%

Consumer Defensive

SPUU
4.5%
MVV
3.3%

Energy

SPUU
3.1%
MVV
4.9%

Utilities

SPUU
2.1%
MVV
2.9%

Real Estate

SPUU
1.8%
MVV
7.3%

Basic Materials

SPUU
1.7%
MVV
4.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPUU vs. MVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPUU
SPUU Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
SPUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPUU Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
SPUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPUU Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

MVV
MVV Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
MVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
MVV Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
MVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
MVV Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPUU vs. MVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF (SPUU) and ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPUUMVVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.28

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.92

2.96

-0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.56

10.16

+2.40

SPUU vs. MVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPUU Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the MVV Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPUU and MVV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPUU vs. MVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPUU drawdown since its inception was -59.35%, smaller than the maximum MVV drawdown of -85.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPUU and MVV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPUUMVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.35%

-85.54%

+26.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.19%

-17.68%

-0.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.18%

-44.80%

+9.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.59%

-45.53%

-1.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.35%

-69.19%

+9.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.59%

0.00%

-1.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.49%

-20.52%

+11.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.22%

5.15%

-0.93%

Volatility

SPUU vs. MVV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF (SPUU) is 9.23%, while ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV) has a volatility of 9.97%. This indicates that SPUU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPUUMVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.23%

9.97%

-0.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.71%

23.40%

-3.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.95%

31.79%

-6.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.64%

39.75%

-6.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.84%

42.41%

-6.57%

SPUU vs. MVV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPUU has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than MVV's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPUU vs. MVV - Dividend Comparison

SPUU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, more than MVV's 0.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MVV
ProShares Ultra Midcap 400
0.66%0.77%0.39%0.77%0.93%0.16%0.29%0.62%0.62%0.21%0.43%0.17%
SPUU
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF
1.34%1.63%0.55%0.83%0.88%3.04%8.03%1.80%5.50%6.96%8.08%4.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPUU and MVV have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MVV has higher volatility (9.97%) compared to SPUU (9.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPUU dropped -59.35% vs MVV's -85.54%.

On 10-year performance, SPUU leads with 25.04% vs 14.27% for MVV. On fees, SPUU is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, SPUU has been the lower-risk option at 9.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPUU has performed better with a 25.04% return vs 14.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPUU is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for MVV.

SPUU has the higher dividend yield at 1.34%, compared with 0.66% for MVV.

SPUU tracks S&P 500 Index (200% Daily), while MVV tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SPUU and 0.95% for MVV.

SPUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPUU and MVV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer