PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPSM vs. VTWO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPSM vs. VTWO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SPSM) and Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPSM achieves a 15.28% return, which is significantly lower than VTWO's 17.08% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SPSM having a 10.77% annualized return and VTWO not far ahead at 11.07%.


SPSM

1D
-0.92%
1M
1.62%
YTD
15.28%
6M
14.19%
1Y
31.50%
3Y*
14.42%
5Y*
5.71%
10Y*
10.77%

VTWO

1D
-1.38%
1M
3.51%
YTD
17.08%
6M
15.89%
1Y
39.34%
3Y*
18.11%
5Y*
6.28%
10Y*
11.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPSM vs. VTWO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPSM
SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF
15.28%6.11%8.55%16.11%-16.12%26.67%11.69%25.85%-11.17%15.44%
VTWO
Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF
17.08%12.90%11.55%17.08%-20.49%14.79%20.22%25.81%-11.15%14.69%

Correlation

The correlation between SPSM and VTWO is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2013

0.95

The correlation between SPSM and VTWO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPSM vs. VTWO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPSM
VTWO

Financial Services

16.9%
15.7%

Industrials

15.5%
17.7%

Technology

15.5%
17.0%

Consumer Cyclical

13.4%
8.4%

Healthcare

11.0%
16.5%

Real Estate

7.7%
6.1%

Energy

5.9%
6.1%

Basic Materials

5.1%
4.8%

Communication Services

3.6%
2.4%

Consumer Defensive

3.5%
2.4%

Utilities

2.0%
2.9%

Financial Services

SPSM
16.9%
VTWO
15.7%

Industrials

SPSM
15.5%
VTWO
17.7%

Technology

SPSM
15.5%
VTWO
17.0%

Consumer Cyclical

SPSM
13.4%
VTWO
8.4%

Healthcare

SPSM
11.0%
VTWO
16.5%

Real Estate

SPSM
7.7%
VTWO
6.1%

Energy

SPSM
5.9%
VTWO
6.1%

Basic Materials

SPSM
5.1%
VTWO
4.8%

Communication Services

SPSM
3.6%
VTWO
2.4%

Consumer Defensive

SPSM
3.5%
VTWO
2.4%

Utilities

SPSM
2.0%
VTWO
2.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPSM vs. VTWO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPSM
SPSM Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
SPSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPSM Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
SPSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPSM Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

VTWO
VTWO Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
VTWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTWO Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
VTWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTWO Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPSM vs. VTWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SPSM) and Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPSMVTWODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.34

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.63

3.60

+0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.14

12.79

-0.65

SPSM vs. VTWO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPSM Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the VTWO Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPSM and VTWO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPSMVTWODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.82

2.07

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

0.28

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.48

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.52

-0.07

Drawdowns

SPSM vs. VTWO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPSM drawdown since its inception was -42.89%, roughly equal to the maximum VTWO drawdown of -41.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPSM and VTWO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPSMVTWODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.89%

-41.19%

-1.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.72%

-10.99%

+2.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.94%

-27.57%

-0.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.94%

-31.88%

+3.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.89%

-41.19%

-1.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.97%

-1.50%

+0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.93%

-8.39%

+0.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.60%

3.08%

-0.48%

Volatility

SPSM vs. VTWO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SPSM) is 4.44%, while Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO) has a volatility of 5.73%. This indicates that SPSM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPSMVTWODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.44%

5.73%

-1.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.64%

13.50%

-1.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.47%

19.12%

-1.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.43%

22.48%

-1.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.99%

23.08%

-0.09%

SPSM vs. VTWO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPSM has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than VTWO's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPSM vs. VTWO - Dividend Comparison

SPSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, more than VTWO's 1.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPSM
SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF
1.43%1.62%1.85%1.61%1.38%1.40%1.34%1.58%1.82%1.51%1.49%2.37%
VTWO
Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF
1.08%1.25%1.21%1.45%1.48%1.13%0.92%1.36%1.41%1.18%1.27%1.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, SPSM and VTWO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VTWO has higher volatility (5.73%) compared to SPSM (4.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPSM dropped -42.89% vs VTWO's -41.19%.

On 10-year performance, VTWO leads with 11.07% vs 10.77% for SPSM. On fees, SPSM is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, SPSM has been the lower-risk option at 4.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VTWO has performed better with a 11.07% return vs 10.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPSM is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for VTWO.

SPSM has the higher dividend yield at 1.43%, compared with 1.08% for VTWO.

SPSM tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index, while VTWO tracks Russell 2000 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SPSM and 0.10% for VTWO.

VTWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPSM and VTWO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer