SPSM vs. VTWO
SPSM (SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF) and VTWO (Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds - SPSM tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Index while VTWO tracks the Russell 2000 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPSM returned 10.77%/yr vs 11.07%/yr for VTWO. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SPSM charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for VTWO.
Performance
SPSM vs. VTWO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPSM achieves a 15.28% return, which is significantly lower than VTWO's 17.08% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SPSM having a 10.77% annualized return and VTWO not far ahead at 11.07%.
SPSM
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 1.62%
- YTD
- 15.28%
- 6M
- 14.19%
- 1Y
- 31.50%
- 3Y*
- 14.42%
- 5Y*
- 5.71%
- 10Y*
- 10.77%
VTWO
- 1D
- -1.38%
- 1M
- 3.51%
- YTD
- 17.08%
- 6M
- 15.89%
- 1Y
- 39.34%
- 3Y*
- 18.11%
- 5Y*
- 6.28%
- 10Y*
- 11.07%
SPSM vs. VTWO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPSM SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF | 15.28% | 6.11% | 8.55% | 16.11% | -16.12% | 26.67% | 11.69% | 25.85% | -11.17% | 15.44% |
VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF | 17.08% | 12.90% | 11.55% | 17.08% | -20.49% | 14.79% | 20.22% | 25.81% | -11.15% | 14.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPSM and VTWO is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2013 | 0.95 |
The correlation between SPSM and VTWO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPSM vs. VTWO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPSM
VTWO
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Financial Services
SPSM
VTWO
Industrials
SPSM
VTWO
Technology
SPSM
VTWO
Consumer Cyclical
SPSM
VTWO
Healthcare
SPSM
VTWO
Real Estate
SPSM
VTWO
Energy
SPSM
VTWO
Basic Materials
SPSM
VTWO
Communication Services
SPSM
VTWO
Consumer Defensive
SPSM
VTWO
Utilities
SPSM
VTWO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPSM vs. VTWO — Risk / Return Rank
SPSM
VTWO
SPSM vs. VTWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SPSM) and Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPSM | VTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.34 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.63 | 3.60 | +0.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.14 | 12.79 | -0.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPSM | VTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.82 | 2.07 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.28 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.48 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.52 | -0.07 |
Drawdowns
SPSM vs. VTWO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPSM drawdown since its inception was -42.89%, roughly equal to the maximum VTWO drawdown of -41.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPSM and VTWO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPSM | VTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.89% | -41.19% | -1.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.72% | -10.99% | +2.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.94% | -27.57% | -0.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.94% | -31.88% | +3.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.89% | -41.19% | -1.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.97% | -1.50% | +0.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.93% | -8.39% | +0.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.60% | 3.08% | -0.48% |
Volatility
SPSM vs. VTWO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SPSM) is 4.44%, while Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO) has a volatility of 5.73%. This indicates that SPSM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPSM | VTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.44% | 5.73% | -1.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.64% | 13.50% | -1.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.47% | 19.12% | -1.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.43% | 22.48% | -1.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.99% | 23.08% | -0.09% |
SPSM vs. VTWO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPSM has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than VTWO's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPSM vs. VTWO - Dividend Comparison
SPSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, more than VTWO's 1.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPSM SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF | 1.43% | 1.62% | 1.85% | 1.61% | 1.38% | 1.40% | 1.34% | 1.58% | 1.82% | 1.51% | 1.49% | 2.37% |
VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF | 1.08% | 1.25% | 1.21% | 1.45% | 1.48% | 1.13% | 0.92% | 1.36% | 1.41% | 1.18% | 1.27% | 1.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, SPSM and VTWO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VTWO has higher volatility (5.73%) compared to SPSM (4.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPSM dropped -42.89% vs VTWO's -41.19%.
On 10-year performance, VTWO leads with 11.07% vs 10.77% for SPSM. On fees, SPSM is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, SPSM has been the lower-risk option at 4.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VTWO has performed better with a 11.07% return vs 10.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPSM is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for VTWO.
SPSM has the higher dividend yield at 1.43%, compared with 1.08% for VTWO.
SPSM tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index, while VTWO tracks Russell 2000 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SPSM and 0.10% for VTWO.
VTWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPSM and VTWO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer