PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPSM vs. ISCB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPSM vs. ISCB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SPSM) and iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF (ISCB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPSM achieves a 19.74% return, which is significantly higher than ISCB's 13.60% return. Over the past 10 years, SPSM has outperformed ISCB with an annualized return of 11.51%, while ISCB has yielded a comparatively lower 9.87% annualized return.


SPSM

1D
0.09%
1M
4.62%
YTD
19.74%
6M
16.75%
1Y
36.81%
3Y*
16.39%
5Y*
6.72%
10Y*
11.51%

ISCB

1D
-0.03%
1M
3.02%
YTD
13.60%
6M
10.99%
1Y
31.54%
3Y*
17.18%
5Y*
6.24%
10Y*
9.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPSM vs. ISCB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPSM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF
19.74%6.11%8.55%16.11%-16.12%26.67%11.69%25.85%-11.17%15.44%
ISCB
iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF
13.60%12.46%10.90%19.51%-19.04%17.46%6.29%29.42%-13.92%12.95%

Correlation

The correlation between SPSM and ISCB is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2013

0.94

The correlation between SPSM and ISCB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPSM vs. ISCB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPSM
ISCB

Technology

17.1%
16.0%

Financial Services

16.5%
15.6%

Industrials

15.2%
18.5%

Consumer Cyclical

13.1%
11.4%

Healthcare

11.0%
13.5%

Real Estate

7.6%
8.1%

Energy

5.4%
4.5%

Basic Materials

5.0%
4.6%

Communication Services

3.7%
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

3.6%
3.2%

Utilities

1.9%
2.2%

Technology

SPSM
17.1%
ISCB
16.0%

Financial Services

SPSM
16.5%
ISCB
15.6%

Industrials

SPSM
15.2%
ISCB
18.5%

Consumer Cyclical

SPSM
13.1%
ISCB
11.4%

Healthcare

SPSM
11.0%
ISCB
13.5%

Real Estate

SPSM
7.6%
ISCB
8.1%

Energy

SPSM
5.4%
ISCB
4.5%

Basic Materials

SPSM
5.0%
ISCB
4.6%

Communication Services

SPSM
3.7%
ISCB
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

SPSM
3.6%
ISCB
3.2%

Utilities

SPSM
1.9%
ISCB
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPSM vs. ISCB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPSM
SPSM Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
SPSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPSM Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
SPSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPSM Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

ISCB
ISCB Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
ISCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISCB Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
ISCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISCB Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPSM vs. ISCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SPSM) and iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF (ISCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPSMISCBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.32

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.24

3.37

+0.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.31

12.05

+2.26

SPSM vs. ISCB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPSM Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the ISCB Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPSM and ISCB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPSM vs. ISCB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPSM drawdown since its inception was -42.89%, smaller than the maximum ISCB drawdown of -61.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPSM and ISCB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPSMISCBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.89%

-61.25%

+18.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.72%

-9.39%

+0.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.94%

-26.22%

-1.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.94%

-29.94%

+2.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.89%

-44.18%

+1.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.07%

-0.32%

+0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.90%

-9.78%

+1.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.58%

2.62%

-0.04%

Volatility

SPSM vs. ISCB - Volatility Comparison

State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SPSM) has a higher volatility of 4.90% compared to iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF (ISCB) at 4.50%. This indicates that SPSM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISCB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPSMISCBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.90%

4.50%

+0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.03%

11.73%

+0.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.68%

16.75%

+0.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.42%

21.41%

+0.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.01%

22.70%

+0.31%

SPSM vs. ISCB - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPSM has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than ISCB's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPSM vs. ISCB - Dividend Comparison

SPSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, more than ISCB's 1.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ISCB
iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF
1.30%1.38%1.31%1.49%1.63%1.26%1.26%1.25%1.60%1.24%1.58%1.40%
SPSM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF
1.74%1.62%1.85%1.61%1.38%1.40%1.34%1.58%1.82%1.51%1.49%2.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, SPSM and ISCB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SPSM has higher volatility (4.90%) compared to ISCB (4.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPSM dropped -42.89% vs ISCB's -61.25%.

On 10-year performance, SPSM leads with 11.51% vs 9.87% for ISCB. On fees, SPSM is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, ISCB has been the lower-risk option at 4.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPSM has performed better with a 11.51% return vs 9.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPSM is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.04% for ISCB.

SPSM has the higher dividend yield at 1.74%, compared with 1.30% for ISCB.

SPSM tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index, while ISCB tracks Morningstar US Small Cap Extended Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SPSM and 0.04% for ISCB.

SPSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPSM and ISCB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer