PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPSM vs. SCHA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPSM vs. SCHA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SPSM) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPSM achieves a 19.74% return, which is significantly lower than SCHA's 24.67% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SPSM having a 11.51% annualized return and SCHA not far ahead at 11.91%.


SPSM

1D
0.09%
1M
4.62%
YTD
19.74%
6M
16.75%
1Y
36.81%
3Y*
16.39%
5Y*
6.72%
10Y*
11.51%

SCHA

1D
0.77%
1M
6.39%
YTD
24.67%
6M
21.39%
1Y
45.75%
3Y*
20.54%
5Y*
7.90%
10Y*
11.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPSM vs. SCHA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPSM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF
19.74%6.11%8.55%16.11%-16.12%26.67%11.69%25.85%-11.17%15.44%
SCHA
Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF
24.67%11.60%11.16%18.46%-19.81%16.45%19.34%26.50%-11.79%14.94%

Correlation

The correlation between SPSM and SCHA is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2013

0.96

The correlation between SPSM and SCHA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPSM vs. SCHA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPSM
SCHA

Technology

17.1%
24.3%

Financial Services

16.5%
15.4%

Industrials

15.2%
15.4%

Consumer Cyclical

13.1%
9.2%

Healthcare

11.0%
13.8%

Real Estate

7.6%
5.8%

Energy

5.4%
4.8%

Basic Materials

5.0%
4.1%

Communication Services

3.7%
2.3%

Consumer Defensive

3.6%
2.5%

Utilities

1.9%
2.1%

Technology

SPSM
17.1%
SCHA
24.3%

Financial Services

SPSM
16.5%
SCHA
15.4%

Industrials

SPSM
15.2%
SCHA
15.4%

Consumer Cyclical

SPSM
13.1%
SCHA
9.2%

Healthcare

SPSM
11.0%
SCHA
13.8%

Real Estate

SPSM
7.6%
SCHA
5.8%

Energy

SPSM
5.4%
SCHA
4.8%

Basic Materials

SPSM
5.0%
SCHA
4.1%

Communication Services

SPSM
3.7%
SCHA
2.3%

Consumer Defensive

SPSM
3.6%
SCHA
2.5%

Utilities

SPSM
1.9%
SCHA
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPSM vs. SCHA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPSM
SPSM Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
SPSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPSM Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
SPSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPSM Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHA
SCHA Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
SCHA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHA Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHA Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPSM vs. SCHA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SPSM) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPSMSCHADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.41

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.24

4.84

-0.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.31

17.72

-3.41

SPSM vs. SCHA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPSM Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the SCHA Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPSM and SCHA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPSM vs. SCHA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPSM drawdown since its inception was -42.89%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHA drawdown of -42.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPSM and SCHA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPSMSCHADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.89%

-42.41%

-0.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.72%

-9.50%

+0.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.94%

-27.29%

-0.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.94%

-30.79%

+2.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.89%

-42.41%

-0.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.07%

0.00%

-0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.90%

-7.56%

-0.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.58%

2.59%

-0.01%

Volatility

SPSM vs. SCHA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SPSM) is 4.90%, while Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) has a volatility of 6.45%. This indicates that SPSM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPSMSCHADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.90%

6.45%

-1.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.03%

13.80%

-1.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.68%

18.71%

-1.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.42%

22.03%

-0.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.01%

22.78%

+0.23%

SPSM vs. SCHA - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPSM has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than SCHA's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPSM vs. SCHA - Dividend Comparison

SPSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, more than SCHA's 0.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHA
Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF
0.96%1.26%1.51%1.42%1.37%1.19%1.05%1.39%1.58%1.24%1.50%1.48%
SPSM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF
1.74%1.62%1.85%1.61%1.38%1.40%1.34%1.58%1.82%1.51%1.49%2.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, SPSM and SCHA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SCHA has higher volatility (6.45%) compared to SPSM (4.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPSM dropped -42.89% vs SCHA's -42.41%.

On 10-year performance, SCHA leads with 11.91% vs 11.51% for SPSM. On fees, SPSM is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SPSM has been the lower-risk option at 4.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHA has performed better with a 11.91% return vs 11.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPSM is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.04% for SCHA.

SPSM has the higher dividend yield at 1.74%, compared with 0.96% for SCHA.

SPSM tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index, while SCHA tracks Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SPSM and 0.04% for SCHA.

SCHA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPSM and SCHA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer