SPSM vs. SCHA
SPSM (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF) and SCHA (Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds - SPSM tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Index while SCHA tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPSM returned 11.51%/yr vs 11.91%/yr for SCHA. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SPSM charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHA.
Performance
SPSM vs. SCHA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPSM achieves a 19.74% return, which is significantly lower than SCHA's 24.67% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SPSM having a 11.51% annualized return and SCHA not far ahead at 11.91%.
SPSM
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 4.62%
- YTD
- 19.74%
- 6M
- 16.75%
- 1Y
- 36.81%
- 3Y*
- 16.39%
- 5Y*
- 6.72%
- 10Y*
- 11.51%
SCHA
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- 6.39%
- YTD
- 24.67%
- 6M
- 21.39%
- 1Y
- 45.75%
- 3Y*
- 20.54%
- 5Y*
- 7.90%
- 10Y*
- 11.91%
SPSM vs. SCHA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPSM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF | 19.74% | 6.11% | 8.55% | 16.11% | -16.12% | 26.67% | 11.69% | 25.85% | -11.17% | 15.44% |
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 24.67% | 11.60% | 11.16% | 18.46% | -19.81% | 16.45% | 19.34% | 26.50% | -11.79% | 14.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPSM and SCHA is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2013 | 0.96 |
The correlation between SPSM and SCHA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPSM vs. SCHA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPSM
SCHA
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Technology
SPSM
SCHA
Financial Services
SPSM
SCHA
Industrials
SPSM
SCHA
Consumer Cyclical
SPSM
SCHA
Healthcare
SPSM
SCHA
Real Estate
SPSM
SCHA
Energy
SPSM
SCHA
Basic Materials
SPSM
SCHA
Communication Services
SPSM
SCHA
Consumer Defensive
SPSM
SCHA
Utilities
SPSM
SCHA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPSM vs. SCHA — Risk / Return Rank
SPSM
SCHA
SPSM vs. SCHA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SPSM) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPSM | SCHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.41 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.24 | 4.84 | -0.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.31 | 17.72 | -3.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPSM vs. SCHA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPSM drawdown since its inception was -42.89%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHA drawdown of -42.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPSM and SCHA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPSM | SCHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.89% | -42.41% | -0.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.72% | -9.50% | +0.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.94% | -27.29% | -0.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.94% | -30.79% | +2.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.89% | -42.41% | -0.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.07% | 0.00% | -0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.90% | -7.56% | -0.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.58% | 2.59% | -0.01% |
Volatility
SPSM vs. SCHA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SPSM) is 4.90%, while Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) has a volatility of 6.45%. This indicates that SPSM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPSM | SCHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.90% | 6.45% | -1.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.03% | 13.80% | -1.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.68% | 18.71% | -1.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.42% | 22.03% | -0.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.01% | 22.78% | +0.23% |
SPSM vs. SCHA - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPSM has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than SCHA's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPSM vs. SCHA - Dividend Comparison
SPSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, more than SCHA's 0.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 0.96% | 1.26% | 1.51% | 1.42% | 1.37% | 1.19% | 1.05% | 1.39% | 1.58% | 1.24% | 1.50% | 1.48% |
SPSM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF | 1.74% | 1.62% | 1.85% | 1.61% | 1.38% | 1.40% | 1.34% | 1.58% | 1.82% | 1.51% | 1.49% | 2.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, SPSM and SCHA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SCHA has higher volatility (6.45%) compared to SPSM (4.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPSM dropped -42.89% vs SCHA's -42.41%.
On 10-year performance, SCHA leads with 11.91% vs 11.51% for SPSM. On fees, SPSM is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SPSM has been the lower-risk option at 4.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHA has performed better with a 11.91% return vs 11.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPSM is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.04% for SCHA.
SPSM has the higher dividend yield at 1.74%, compared with 0.96% for SCHA.
SPSM tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index, while SCHA tracks Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SPSM and 0.04% for SCHA.
SCHA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPSM and SCHA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer