SPSM vs. VB

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

SPSM (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF) and VB (Vanguard Small-Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds - SPSM tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Index while VB tracks the CRSP US Small Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPSM returned 10.94%/yr vs 11.08%/yr for VB. Their correlation of 0.95 means they have usually moved in the same direction. Both charge a 0.03% expense ratio.

Performance

SPSM vs. VB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SPSM) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPSM achieves a 21.58% return, which is significantly higher than VB's 15.19% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SPSM having a 10.94% annualized return and VB not far ahead at 11.08%.

SPSM

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.67%
• 6M: 15.19%
• YTD: 21.58%
• 1Y: 36.02%
• 3Y*: 13.49%
• 5Y*: 7.48%
• 10Y*: 10.94%
• ALL TIME*: 10.05%

VB

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: -1.73%
• 6M: 10.09%
• YTD: 15.19%
• 1Y: 25.91%
• 3Y*: 14.02%
• 5Y*: 7.45%
• 10Y*: 11.08%
• ALL TIME*: 9.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
SPSM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF	$90.54M	$95.75M	$94.53M
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF	$121.48M	$119.40M	$165.11M

SPSM vs. VB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SPSM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF	21.58%	6.11%	8.55%	16.11%	-16.12%	26.67%	11.69%	25.85%	-11.17%	15.44%
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF	15.19%	8.87%	14.17%	18.22%	-17.51%	17.57%	19.19%	27.34%	-9.34%	16.26%

Correlation

The correlation between SPSM and VB is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.97
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2013	0.95

The correlation between SPSM and VB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPSM vs. VB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SPSM	VB
Financial Services	17.1%	12.4%
Industrials	15.6%	19.9%
Technology	15.5%	17.9%
Consumer Cyclical	13.2%	11.6%
Healthcare	12.4%	12.5%
Real Estate	7.6%	7.9%
Energy	4.7%	3.9%
Basic Materials	4.7%	4.4%
Consumer Defensive	4.2%	3.3%
Communication Services	3.2%	2.9%
Utilities	1.8%	3.3%

Return for Risk

SPSM vs. VB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SPSM

SPSM Risk / Return Rank: 86
SPSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
SPSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
SPSM Omega Ratio Rank: 82
SPSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
SPSM Martin Ratio Rank: 88

VB

VB Risk / Return Rank: 69
VB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
VB Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
VB Omega Ratio Rank: 60
VB Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
VB Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SPSM vs. VB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SPSM) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SPSM	VB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.97	1.46	+0.51
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.87	2.13	+0.75
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.26	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.89	2.67	+1.22
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.32	9.73	+3.59

SPSM vs. VB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPSM Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is higher than the VB Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPSM and VB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SPSM vs. VB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPSM drawdown since its inception was -42.89%, smaller than the maximum VB drawdown of -59.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPSM and VB.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPSM	VB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.89%	-59.56%	+16.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.72%	-8.98%	+0.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.94%	-25.36%	-2.58%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.94%	-28.15%	+0.21%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.89%	-42.05%	-0.84%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.91%	-2.63%	+0.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.84%	-8.39%	+0.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.54%	2.46%	+0.08%

Volatility

SPSM vs. VB - Volatility Comparison

State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SPSM) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) have volatilities of 3.45% and 3.36%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPSM	VB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.45%	3.36%	+0.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.63%	12.01%	-0.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.29%	16.47%	+0.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.27%	20.69%	+0.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.94%	21.37%	+1.57%

SPSM vs. VB - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SPSM and VB have an expense ratio of 0.03%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SPSM vs. VB - Dividend Comparison

SPSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, more than VB's 1.22% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SPSM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF	1.39%	1.62%	1.85%	1.61%	1.38%	1.40%	1.34%	1.58%	1.82%	1.51%	1.49%	2.37%
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF	1.22%	1.33%	1.30%	1.55%	1.59%	1.24%	1.14%	1.39%	1.67%	1.35%	1.50%	1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPSM and VB in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, SPSM and VB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, SPSM or VB?

SPSM has higher volatility (3.45%) compared to VB (3.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPSM dropped -42.89% vs VB's -59.56%.

Which ETF is better, SPSM or VB?

On 10-year performance, VB leads with 11.08% vs 10.94% for SPSM. Both ETFs have the same 0.03% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SPSM or VB?

Over the 10-year period, VB has performed better with a 11.08% return vs 10.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPSM or VB?

SPSM and VB have the same expense ratio: 0.03% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SPSM or VB?

SPSM has the higher dividend yield at 1.39%, compared with 1.22% for VB.

What is the main difference between SPSM and VB?

SPSM tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index, while VB tracks CRSP US Small Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SPSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.