SPDW vs. SPYV
SPDW (SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF) and SPYV (SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPDW is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the S&P Developed Ex-U.S. BMI Index, while SPYV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPDW returned 10.64%/yr vs 12.08%/yr for SPYV. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.04% expense ratio.
Performance
SPDW vs. SPYV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPDW achieves a 14.86% return, which is significantly higher than SPYV's 8.25% return. Over the past 10 years, SPDW has underperformed SPYV with an annualized return of 10.64%, while SPYV has yielded a comparatively higher 12.08% annualized return.
SPDW
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- 1.53%
- YTD
- 14.86%
- 6M
- 16.65%
- 1Y
- 31.27%
- 3Y*
- 19.01%
- 5Y*
- 9.30%
- 10Y*
- 10.64%
SPYV
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- 1.59%
- YTD
- 8.25%
- 6M
- 8.02%
- 1Y
- 21.87%
- 3Y*
- 15.13%
- 5Y*
- 10.98%
- 10Y*
- 12.08%
SPDW vs. SPYV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPDW SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF | 14.86% | 34.75% | 3.55% | 17.81% | -15.98% | 11.45% | 9.90% | 22.41% | -14.22% | 25.81% |
SPYV SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF | 8.25% | 13.18% | 12.24% | 22.20% | -5.28% | 24.91% | 1.38% | 31.70% | -9.01% | 15.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPDW and SPYV is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 26, 2007 | 0.76 |
The correlation between SPDW and SPYV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPDW vs. SPYV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPDW
SPYV
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
SPDW
SPYV
Industrials
SPDW
SPYV
Technology
SPDW
SPYV
Healthcare
SPDW
SPYV
Consumer Cyclical
SPDW
SPYV
Basic Materials
SPDW
SPYV
Consumer Defensive
SPDW
SPYV
Energy
SPDW
SPYV
Communication Services
SPDW
SPYV
Utilities
SPDW
SPYV
Real Estate
SPDW
SPYV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPDW vs. SPYV — Risk / Return Rank
SPDW
SPYV
SPDW vs. SPYV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPDW | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.37 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.58 | 3.33 | -0.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.95 | 12.73 | -2.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPDW vs. SPYV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPDW drawdown since its inception was -60.02%, roughly equal to the maximum SPYV drawdown of -58.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPDW and SPYV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPDW | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.02% | -58.45% | -1.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.55% | -6.22% | -5.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.53% | -17.54% | +4.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.21% | -17.89% | -12.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.98% | -36.89% | +1.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.99% | -0.18% | -0.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.89% | -8.71% | -4.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.99% | 1.63% | +1.36% |
Volatility
SPDW vs. SPYV - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW) has a higher volatility of 6.86% compared to SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) at 2.70%. This indicates that SPDW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPDW | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.86% | 2.70% | +4.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.23% | 7.26% | +6.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.51% | 9.97% | +6.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.66% | 14.42% | +2.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.31% | 16.94% | +0.37% |
SPDW vs. SPYV - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SPDW and SPYV have an expense ratio of 0.04%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPDW vs. SPYV - Dividend Comparison
SPDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, more than SPYV's 1.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPDW SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF | 2.87% | 3.30% | 3.19% | 2.75% | 3.12% | 3.04% | 1.87% | 3.13% | 3.08% | 1.86% | 3.11% | 2.78% |
SPYV SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF | 1.68% | 1.77% | 2.29% | 1.75% | 2.22% | 2.10% | 2.38% | 2.25% | 2.97% | 2.77% | 2.39% | 2.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPDW and SPYV have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPDW has higher volatility (6.86%) compared to SPYV (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPDW dropped -60.02% vs SPYV's -58.45%.
On 10-year performance, SPYV leads with 12.08% vs 10.64% for SPDW. Both ETFs have the same 0.04% expense ratio. On volatility, SPYV has been the lower-risk option at 2.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPYV has performed better with a 12.08% return vs 10.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPDW and SPYV have the same expense ratio: 0.04% per year.
SPDW has the higher dividend yield at 2.87%, compared with 1.68% for SPYV.
SPDW is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while SPYV is S&P 500. SPDW tracks S&P Developed Ex-U.S. BMI Index, while SPYV tracks S&P 500 Value Index.
SPYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPDW and SPYV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer