SNSR vs. ARMH

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

SNSR (Global X Internet of Things ETF) and ARMH (Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. SNSR is passively managed, while ARMH is actively managed. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SNSR charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ARMH.

Performance

SNSR vs. ARMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Internet of Things ETF (SNSR) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SNSR

• 1D: 0.47%
• 1M: -5.99%
• YTD: 32.97%
• 6M: 31.47%
• 1Y: 33.45%
• 3Y*: 14.85%
• 5Y*: 7.34%
• 10Y*: —

ARMH

• 1D: -3.22%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNSR vs. ARMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
SNSR Global X Internet of Things ETF	-3.93%
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF	13.29%

Correlation

The correlation between SNSR and ARMH is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026	0.56

Return for Risk

SNSR vs. ARMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNSR

SNSR Risk / Return Rank: 44
SNSR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
SNSR Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
SNSR Omega Ratio Rank: 38
SNSR Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
SNSR Martin Ratio Rank: 47

ARMH

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNSR vs. ARMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Internet of Things ETF (SNSR) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SNSR	ARMH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.28	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.81	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.35	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.86	—	—

Drawdowns

SNSR vs. ARMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNSR drawdown since its inception was -38.46%, which is greater than ARMH's maximum drawdown of -24.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNSR and ARMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	SNSR	ARMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.46%	-24.85%	-13.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.30%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.32%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.03%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.66%	-20.68%	+12.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.48%	-8.89%	-0.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.89%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SNSR	ARMH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.22%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.71%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.28%	117.02%	-90.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.69%	117.02%	-91.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.88%	117.02%	-92.14%

SNSR vs. ARMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNSR has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

SNSR vs. ARMH - Dividend Comparison

SNSR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, while ARMH has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SNSR Global X Internet of Things ETF	0.41%	0.54%	0.73%	0.74%	0.82%	0.43%	0.21%	1.12%	1.25%	1.11%	0.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SNSR and ARMH in my portfolio?

SNSR and ARMH have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SNSR or ARMH?

On fees, ARMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SNSR or ARMH?

ARMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for SNSR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SNSR or ARMH?

SNSR has the higher dividend yield at 0.41%, compared with 0.00% for ARMH.

What is the main difference between SNSR and ARMH?

They also come from different issuers: Global X and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for SNSR and 0.19% for ARMH.