SNOY vs. SPYG

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

SNOY (YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF) and SPYG (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SNOY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while SPYG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index. SNOY is actively managed, while SPYG is passively managed. Over the past year, SNOY returned 11.26% vs 29.17% for SPYG. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SNOY charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPYG.

Performance

SNOY vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF (SNOY) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNOY achieves a 8.61% return, which is significantly lower than SPYG's 9.70% return.

SNOY

• 1D: -2.49%
• 1M: 47.92%
• YTD: 8.61%
• 6M: 10.04%
• 1Y: 11.26%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SPYG

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: -1.24%
• YTD: 9.70%
• 6M: 10.60%
• 1Y: 29.17%
• 3Y*: 25.85%
• 5Y*: 14.92%
• 10Y*: 17.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNOY vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SNOY YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF	8.61%	30.66%	21.28%
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF	9.70%	22.09%	14.17%

Correlation

The correlation between SNOY and SPYG is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2024	0.46

The correlation between SNOY and SPYG shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (1 year) to 0.46 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

SNOY vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNOY

SNOY Risk / Return Rank: 14
SNOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
SNOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
SNOY Omega Ratio Rank: 18
SNOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
SNOY Martin Ratio Rank: 12

SPYG

SPYG Risk / Return Rank: 52
SPYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
SPYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
SPYG Omega Ratio Rank: 53
SPYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
SPYG Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNOY vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF (SNOY) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SNOY	SPYG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.18	1.65	-1.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.77	2.26	-1.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.29	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.20	2.01	-1.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.45	8.08	-7.63

SNOY vs. SPYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNOY Sharpe Ratio is 0.18, which is lower than the SPYG Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNOY and SPYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SNOY vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNOY drawdown since its inception was -50.90%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNOY and SPYG.

Drawdown Indicators

	SNOY	SPYG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.90%	-67.63%	+16.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-50.90%	-13.76%	-37.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-22.14%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-32.67%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-32.67%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.86%	-4.65%	-7.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.69%	-24.30%	+11.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	23.02%	3.42%	+19.60%

Volatility

SNOY vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF (SNOY) has a higher volatility of 33.96% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) at 6.33%. This indicates that SNOY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SNOY	SPYG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	33.96%	6.33%	+27.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	47.65%	13.48%	+34.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	57.45%	16.81%	+40.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	51.88%	21.27%	+30.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	51.88%	20.70%	+31.18%

SNOY vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNOY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

SNOY vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison

SNOY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 70.30%, more than SPYG's 0.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SNOY YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF	70.30%	84.96%	33.32%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF	0.48%	0.52%	0.60%	1.15%	1.03%	0.62%	0.90%	1.37%	1.51%	1.41%	1.55%	1.57%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SNOY and SPYG in my portfolio?

SNOY and SPYG have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SNOY or SPYG?

SNOY has higher volatility (33.96%) compared to SPYG (6.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNOY dropped -50.90% vs SPYG's -67.63%.

Which ETF is better, SNOY or SPYG?

On 1-year performance, SPYG leads with 29.17% vs 11.26% for SNOY. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPYG has been the lower-risk option at 6.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SNOY or SPYG?

Over the 1-year period, SPYG has performed better with a 29.17% return vs 11.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SNOY or SPYG?

SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for SNOY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SNOY or SPYG?

SNOY has the higher dividend yield at 70.30%, compared with 0.48% for SPYG.

What is the main difference between SNOY and SPYG?

SNOY is categorized as Derivative Income, while SPYG is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for SNOY and 0.04% for SPYG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SPYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.