SNOY vs. MARO

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

SNOY (YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF) and MARO (YieldMax MARA Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SNOY returned 24.93% vs -43.81% for MARO. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.

Performance

SNOY vs. MARO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF (SNOY) and YieldMax MARA Option Income Strategy ETF (MARO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNOY achieves a 23.22% return, which is significantly higher than MARO's 14.15% return.

SNOY

• 1D: 2.10%
• 1M: 13.46%
• 6M: 24.35%
• YTD: 23.22%
• 1Y: 24.93%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MARO

• 1D: -2.39%
• 1M: -8.22%
• 6M: 2.46%
• YTD: 14.15%
• 1Y: -43.81%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNOY vs. MARO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SNOY YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF	23.22%	30.66%	-12.49%
MARO YieldMax MARA Option Income Strategy ETF	14.15%	-48.05%	-23.63%

Correlation

The correlation between SNOY and MARO is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.27
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2024	0.35

Return for Risk

SNOY vs. MARO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNOY

SNOY Risk / Return Rank: 20
SNOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
SNOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
SNOY Omega Ratio Rank: 27
SNOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
SNOY Martin Ratio Rank: 16

MARO

MARO Risk / Return Rank: 4
MARO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
MARO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
MARO Omega Ratio Rank: 4
MARO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
MARO Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNOY vs. MARO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF (SNOY) and YieldMax MARA Option Income Strategy ETF (MARO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SNOY	MARO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.43	-0.69	+1.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.17	-0.82	+1.99
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	0.90	+0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.49	-0.67	+1.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.08	-1.07	+2.15

SNOY vs. MARO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNOY Sharpe Ratio is 0.43, which is higher than the MARO Sharpe Ratio of -0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNOY and MARO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SNOY vs. MARO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNOY drawdown since its inception was -50.90%, smaller than the maximum MARO drawdown of -71.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNOY and MARO.

Drawdown Indicators

	SNOY	MARO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.90%	-71.75%	+20.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-50.90%	-65.51%	+14.61%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.00%	-56.50%	+56.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.47%	-42.64%	+30.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	23.10%	40.95%	-17.85%

Volatility

SNOY vs. MARO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF (SNOY) is 9.11%, while YieldMax MARA Option Income Strategy ETF (MARO) has a volatility of 19.08%. This indicates that SNOY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MARO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SNOY	MARO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.11%	19.08%	-9.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	47.77%	49.30%	-1.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	57.90%	63.58%	-5.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	51.29%	65.58%	-14.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	51.29%	65.58%	-14.29%

SNOY vs. MARO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SNOY and MARO have an expense ratio of 0.99%.

Dividends

SNOY vs. MARO - Dividend Comparison

SNOY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 68.35%, less than MARO's 218.17% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
MARO YieldMax MARA Option Income Strategy ETF	218.17%	277.68%	0.00%
SNOY YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF	68.35%	84.96%	33.32%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SNOY and MARO in my portfolio?

SNOY and MARO have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SNOY or MARO?

MARO has higher volatility (19.08%) compared to SNOY (9.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNOY dropped -50.90% vs MARO's -71.75%.

Which ETF is better, SNOY or MARO?

On 1-year performance, SNOY leads with 24.93% vs -43.81% for MARO. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, SNOY has been the lower-risk option at 9.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SNOY or MARO?

Over the 1-year period, SNOY has performed better with a 24.93% return vs -43.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SNOY or MARO?

SNOY and MARO have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SNOY or MARO?

MARO has the higher dividend yield at 218.17%, compared with 68.35% for SNOY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SNOY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.43 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.