SNOY vs. MSTY
SNOY (YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF) and MSTY (YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SNOY returned 8.45% vs -65.11% for MSTY. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
SNOY vs. MSTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SNOY achieves a 7.77% return, which is significantly higher than MSTY's -24.36% return.
SNOY
- 1D
- -2.00%
- 1M
- 37.61%
- YTD
- 7.77%
- 6M
- 5.51%
- 1Y
- 8.45%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSTY
- 1D
- -1.97%
- 1M
- -28.49%
- YTD
- -24.36%
- 6M
- -28.98%
- 1Y
- -65.11%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SNOY vs. MSTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SNOY YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF | 7.77% | 30.66% | 21.28% |
MSTY YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF | -24.36% | -42.71% | 53.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between SNOY and MSTY is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2024 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SNOY vs. MSTY — Risk / Return Rank
SNOY
MSTY
SNOY vs. MSTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF (SNOY) and YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SNOY | MSTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 0.79 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.17 | -0.91 | +1.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.37 | -1.33 | +1.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SNOY vs. MSTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SNOY drawdown since its inception was -50.90%, smaller than the maximum MSTY drawdown of -71.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNOY and MSTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SNOY | MSTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.90% | -71.79% | +20.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -50.90% | -71.79% | +20.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.54% | -70.26% | +57.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.67% | -26.90% | +14.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.07% | 49.15% | -26.08% |
Volatility
SNOY vs. MSTY - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF (SNOY) has a higher volatility of 34.27% compared to YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY) at 19.16%. This indicates that SNOY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SNOY | MSTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 34.27% | 19.16% | +15.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 47.67% | 49.48% | -1.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.70% | 62.00% | -4.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.71% | 71.81% | -20.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.71% | 71.81% | -20.10% |
SNOY vs. MSTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SNOY and MSTY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
SNOY vs. MSTY - Dividend Comparison
SNOY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 74.29%, less than MSTY's 273.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
MSTY YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF | 273.05% | 294.61% | 104.56% |
SNOY YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF | 74.29% | 84.96% | 33.32% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SNOY and MSTY have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SNOY has higher volatility (34.27%) compared to MSTY (19.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNOY dropped -50.90% vs MSTY's -71.79%.
On 1-year performance, SNOY leads with 8.45% vs -65.11% for MSTY. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, MSTY has been the lower-risk option at 19.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SNOY has performed better with a 8.45% return vs -65.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SNOY and MSTY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
MSTY has the higher dividend yield at 273.05%, compared with 74.29% for SNOY.
SNOY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.15 vs -1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SNOY and MSTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer