PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SNOY vs. TSLY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SNOY vs. TSLY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF (SNOY) and YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (TSLY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNOY achieves a 23.22% return, which is significantly higher than TSLY's -6.62% return.


SNOY

1D
2.10%
1M
13.46%
6M
24.35%
YTD
23.22%
1Y
24.93%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TSLY

1D
-2.52%
1M
-1.48%
6M
-6.51%
YTD
-6.62%
1Y
28.69%
3Y*
5.11%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNOY vs. TSLY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SNOY
YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF
23.22%30.66%21.28%
TSLY
YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF
-6.62%13.62%59.01%

Correlation

The correlation between SNOY and TSLY is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2024

0.33

The correlation between SNOY and TSLY shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (1 year) to 0.33 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SNOY vs. TSLY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNOY
SNOY Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
SNOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNOY Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
SNOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNOY Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

TSLY
TSLY Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
TSLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLY Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLY Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNOY vs. TSLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF (SNOY) and YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (TSLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SNOYTSLYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.15

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.49

1.33

-0.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.08

3.08

-2.00

SNOY vs. TSLY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNOY Sharpe Ratio is 0.43, which is lower than the TSLY Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNOY and TSLY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SNOY vs. TSLY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNOY drawdown since its inception was -50.90%, roughly equal to the maximum TSLY drawdown of -49.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNOY and TSLY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SNOYTSLYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.90%

-49.52%

-1.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.90%

-21.64%

-29.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.00%

-12.69%

+12.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.47%

-19.75%

+7.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.10%

9.34%

+13.76%

Volatility

SNOY vs. TSLY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF (SNOY) is 9.11%, while YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (TSLY) has a volatility of 14.20%. This indicates that SNOY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SNOYTSLYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.11%

14.20%

-5.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

47.77%

25.91%

+21.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.90%

36.19%

+21.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.29%

45.64%

+5.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.29%

45.64%

+5.65%

SNOY vs. TSLY - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNOY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than TSLY's 1.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

SNOY vs. TSLY - Dividend Comparison

SNOY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 68.35%, less than TSLY's 85.55% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
SNOY
YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF
68.35%84.96%33.32%0.00%
TSLY
YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF
85.55%91.19%82.30%76.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


SNOY and TSLY have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSLY has higher volatility (14.20%) compared to SNOY (9.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNOY dropped -50.90% vs TSLY's -49.52%.

On 1-year performance, TSLY leads with 28.69% vs 24.93% for SNOY. On fees, SNOY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, SNOY has been the lower-risk option at 9.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TSLY has performed better with a 28.69% return vs 24.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SNOY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for TSLY.

TSLY has the higher dividend yield at 85.55%, compared with 68.35% for SNOY.

SNOY is categorized as Derivative Income, while TSLY is Options Trading. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for SNOY and 1.07% for TSLY.

TSLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.80 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SNOY and TSLY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer