PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMMV vs. ISCG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMMV vs. ISCG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF (SMMV) and iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMMV achieves a 2.04% return, which is significantly lower than ISCG's 12.92% return.


SMMV

1D
-0.27%
1M
-1.47%
YTD
2.04%
6M
2.90%
1Y
6.20%
3Y*
10.82%
5Y*
4.87%
10Y*

ISCG

1D
-0.93%
1M
3.29%
YTD
12.92%
6M
12.57%
1Y
30.64%
3Y*
17.01%
5Y*
5.31%
10Y*
11.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMMV vs. ISCG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMMV
iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF
2.04%6.42%18.29%5.63%-10.00%16.64%-2.88%24.21%1.15%14.31%
ISCG
iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF
12.92%12.88%13.35%23.13%-26.75%-1.26%43.41%27.66%-6.91%24.68%

Correlation

The correlation between SMMV and ISCG is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2016

0.79

The correlation between SMMV and ISCG shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.83 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SMMV vs. ISCG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SMMV
ISCG

Healthcare

17.1%
15.4%

Industrials

13.8%
24.6%

Real Estate

13.4%
5.2%

Technology

10.9%
21.4%

Financial Services

10.9%
10.6%

Consumer Defensive

8.1%
2.9%

Utilities

7.7%
1.0%

Consumer Cyclical

5.6%
9.9%

Communication Services

5.4%
2.8%

Energy

4.5%
2.8%

Basic Materials

2.0%
3.5%

Healthcare

SMMV
17.1%
ISCG
15.4%

Industrials

SMMV
13.8%
ISCG
24.6%

Real Estate

SMMV
13.4%
ISCG
5.2%

Technology

SMMV
10.9%
ISCG
21.4%

Financial Services

SMMV
10.9%
ISCG
10.6%

Consumer Defensive

SMMV
8.1%
ISCG
2.9%

Utilities

SMMV
7.7%
ISCG
1.0%

Consumer Cyclical

SMMV
5.6%
ISCG
9.9%

Communication Services

SMMV
5.4%
ISCG
2.8%

Energy

SMMV
4.5%
ISCG
2.8%

Basic Materials

SMMV
2.0%
ISCG
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMMV vs. ISCG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMMV
SMMV Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
SMMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMMV Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
SMMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMMV Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

ISCG
ISCG Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
ISCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISCG Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
ISCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISCG Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMMV vs. ISCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF (SMMV) and iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMMVISCGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.29

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.89

2.69

-1.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.82

10.31

-7.48

SMMV vs. ISCG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMMV Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the ISCG Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMMV and ISCG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMMVISCGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

1.70

-1.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.23

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.41

+0.11

Drawdowns

SMMV vs. ISCG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMMV drawdown since its inception was -38.77%, smaller than the maximum ISCG drawdown of -57.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMMV and ISCG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMMVISCGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.77%

-57.72%

+18.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.02%

-11.43%

+4.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.68%

-26.71%

+13.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.00%

-37.80%

+19.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.44%

-0.93%

-3.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.10%

-11.63%

+6.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.20%

2.98%

-0.78%

Volatility

SMMV vs. ISCG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF (SMMV) is 2.27%, while iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG) has a volatility of 4.93%. This indicates that SMMV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMMVISCGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.27%

4.93%

-2.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.30%

13.09%

-6.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.73%

18.13%

-8.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.50%

22.95%

-9.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.69%

23.16%

-7.47%

SMMV vs. ISCG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMMV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than ISCG's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SMMV vs. ISCG - Dividend Comparison

SMMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, more than ISCG's 0.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ISCG
iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF
0.56%0.61%0.84%0.77%0.92%0.62%0.10%0.27%0.40%0.52%1.19%0.64%
SMMV
iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF
1.75%1.77%1.76%2.30%1.67%1.08%1.39%1.64%1.72%1.63%0.79%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMMV and ISCG have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ISCG has higher volatility (4.93%) compared to SMMV (2.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMMV dropped -38.77% vs ISCG's -57.72%.

On 5-year performance, ISCG leads with 5.31% vs 4.87% for SMMV. On fees, ISCG is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SMMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ISCG has performed better with a 5.31% return vs 4.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ISCG is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SMMV.

SMMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 0.56% for ISCG.

SMMV tracks MSCI USA Small Cap Minimum Volatility (USD) Index, while ISCG tracks Morningstar US Small Cap Broad Growth Extended Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SMMV and 0.06% for ISCG.

ISCG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMMV and ISCG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer