SMMV vs. IWM
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF (SMMV) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM).
SMMV and IWM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SMMV is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA Small Cap Minimum Volatility (USD) Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2016. IWM is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Index. It was launched on May 22, 2000. Both SMMV and IWM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SMMV or IWM.
Correlation
The correlation between SMMV and IWM is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
SMMV vs. IWM - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
SMMV:
1.59
IWM:
0.59
SMMV:
2.32
IWM:
0.96
SMMV:
1.29
IWM:
1.12
SMMV:
2.52
IWM:
0.63
SMMV:
10.26
IWM:
3.02
SMMV:
1.85%
IWM:
4.03%
SMMV:
11.93%
IWM:
20.78%
SMMV:
-38.77%
IWM:
-59.05%
SMMV:
-5.97%
IWM:
-7.57%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMMV achieves a 18.29% return, which is significantly higher than IWM's 12.61% return.
SMMV
18.29%
-5.22%
12.59%
18.02%
4.87%
N/A
IWM
12.61%
-6.16%
12.10%
12.18%
7.43%
7.80%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SMMV vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMMV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SMMV vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF (SMMV) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SMMV vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison
SMMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, more than IWM's 1.13% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMMV iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF | 1.76% | 1.78% | 1.67% | 1.07% | 1.39% | 1.65% | 1.72% | 1.62% | 0.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 1.13% | 1.35% | 1.48% | 0.94% | 1.04% | 1.26% | 1.40% | 1.26% | 1.38% | 1.54% | 1.26% | 1.23% |
Drawdowns
SMMV vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMMV drawdown since its inception was -38.77%, smaller than the maximum IWM drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMMV and IWM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SMMV vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF (SMMV) is 3.22%, while iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) has a volatility of 5.62%. This indicates that SMMV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.