SMMV vs. VB

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

SMMV (iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF) and VB (Vanguard Small-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMMV is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Small Cap Minimum Volatility (USD) Index, while VB is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Small Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SMMV returned 5.15%/yr vs 7.39%/yr for VB. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SMMV charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VB.

Performance

SMMV vs. VB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF (SMMV) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMMV achieves a 2.88% return, which is significantly lower than VB's 15.68% return.

SMMV

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: -0.74%
• YTD: 2.88%
• 6M: 1.54%
• 1Y: 8.20%
• 3Y*: 11.50%
• 5Y*: 5.15%
• 10Y*: —

VB

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: 2.83%
• YTD: 15.68%
• 6M: 13.00%
• 1Y: 30.17%
• 3Y*: 17.54%
• 5Y*: 7.39%
• 10Y*: 11.79%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMMV vs. VB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SMMV iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF	2.88%	6.42%	18.29%	5.63%	-10.00%	16.64%	-2.88%	24.21%	1.15%	14.31%
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF	15.68%	8.87%	14.17%	18.22%	-17.51%	17.57%	19.19%	27.34%	-9.34%	16.26%

Correlation

The correlation between SMMV and VB is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2016	0.85

The correlation between SMMV and VB shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.88 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SMMV vs. VB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SMMV	VB
Healthcare	17.6%	11.3%
Technology	14.5%	19.4%
Industrials	13.5%	20.6%
Real Estate	12.6%	7.5%
Financial Services	8.9%	12.3%
Consumer Defensive	8.0%	3.1%
Utilities	7.5%	3.1%
Communication Services	5.3%	3.0%
Energy	5.3%	4.2%
Consumer Cyclical	5.1%	10.9%
Basic Materials	1.6%	4.7%

Return for Risk

SMMV vs. VB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMMV

SMMV Risk / Return Rank: 24
SMMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
SMMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
SMMV Omega Ratio Rank: 22
SMMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
SMMV Martin Ratio Rank: 27

VB

VB Risk / Return Rank: 60
VB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
VB Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
VB Omega Ratio Rank: 52
VB Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
VB Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMMV vs. VB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF (SMMV) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SMMV	VB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.84	1.82	-0.98
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.27	2.59	-1.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.31	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.17	3.38	-2.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.54	12.38	-8.84

SMMV vs. VB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMMV Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is lower than the VB Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMMV and VB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SMMV vs. VB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMMV drawdown since its inception was -38.77%, smaller than the maximum VB drawdown of -59.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMMV and VB.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMMV	VB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.77%	-59.56%	+20.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.02%	-8.98%	+1.96%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.68%	-25.36%	+11.68%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.00%	-28.15%	+10.15%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-42.05%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.66%	-0.39%	-3.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.09%	-8.42%	+3.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.32%	2.44%	-0.12%

Volatility

SMMV vs. VB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF (SMMV) is 2.27%, while Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) has a volatility of 4.92%. This indicates that SMMV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SMMV	VB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.27%	4.92%	-2.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.44%	12.21%	-5.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.81%	16.66%	-6.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.47%	20.78%	-7.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.66%	21.45%	-5.79%

SMMV vs. VB - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMMV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VB's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SMMV vs. VB - Dividend Comparison

SMMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, more than VB's 1.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SMMV iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF	1.76%	1.77%	1.76%	2.30%	1.67%	1.08%	1.39%	1.64%	1.72%	1.63%	0.79%	0.00%
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF	1.18%	1.33%	1.30%	1.55%	1.59%	1.24%	1.14%	1.39%	1.67%	1.35%	1.50%	1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SMMV and VB in my portfolio?

SMMV and VB have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SMMV or VB?

VB has higher volatility (4.92%) compared to SMMV (2.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMMV dropped -38.77% vs VB's -59.56%.

Which ETF is better, SMMV or VB?

On 5-year performance, VB leads with 7.39% vs 5.15% for SMMV. On fees, VB is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, SMMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SMMV or VB?

Over the 5-year period, VB has performed better with a 7.39% return vs 5.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SMMV or VB?

VB is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SMMV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SMMV or VB?

SMMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.76%, compared with 1.18% for VB.

What is the main difference between SMMV and VB?

SMMV is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while VB is Small Cap Blend Equities. SMMV tracks MSCI USA Small Cap Minimum Volatility (USD) Index, while VB tracks CRSP US Small Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SMMV and 0.05% for VB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.