SMMD vs. CAFG

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SMMD (iShares Russell 2500 ETF) and CAFG (Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds - SMMD tracks the Russell 2500 Index while CAFG tracks the Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SMMD returned 19.07%/yr vs 15.59%/yr for CAFG. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SMMD charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for CAFG.

Performance

SMMD vs. CAFG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell 2500 ETF (SMMD) and Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (CAFG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMMD achieves a 18.99% return, which is significantly lower than CAFG's 27.15% return.

SMMD

• 1D: 0.52%
• 1M: 3.44%
• YTD: 18.99%
• 6M: 17.98%
• 1Y: 36.93%
• 3Y*: 19.07%
• 5Y*: 7.75%
• 10Y*: —

CAFG

• 1D: 1.09%
• 1M: 2.66%
• YTD: 27.15%
• 6M: 25.89%
• 1Y: 32.91%
• 3Y*: 15.59%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMMD vs. CAFG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SMMD iShares Russell 2500 ETF	18.99%	11.72%	11.87%	17.28%
CAFG Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF	27.15%	0.17%	6.95%	20.44%

Correlation

The correlation between SMMD and CAFG is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2023	0.88

The correlation between SMMD and CAFG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

SMMD vs. CAFG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SMMD	CAFG
Industrials	21.0%	19.3%
Technology	18.8%	30.8%
Financial Services	13.8%	-
Healthcare	11.8%	18.8%
Consumer Cyclical	10.6%	7.2%
Real Estate	6.7%	-
Energy	4.9%	13.4%
Basic Materials	4.4%	2.4%
Consumer Defensive	2.8%	3.0%
Utilities	2.7%	1.4%
Communication Services	2.5%	3.7%

Return for Risk

SMMD vs. CAFG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMMD

SMMD Risk / Return Rank: 70
SMMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
SMMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
SMMD Omega Ratio Rank: 61
SMMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
SMMD Martin Ratio Rank: 77

CAFG

CAFG Risk / Return Rank: 64
CAFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
CAFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
CAFG Omega Ratio Rank: 53
CAFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
CAFG Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMMD vs. CAFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 2500 ETF (SMMD) and Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (CAFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SMMD	CAFG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.16	1.90	+0.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.02	2.72	+0.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.32	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.84	4.06	-0.22
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.65	13.23	+1.41
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SMMD vs. CAFG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMMD Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is comparable to the CAFG Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMMD and CAFG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SMMD	CAFG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.16	1.90	+0.26
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.37	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.50	0.89	-0.39

Drawdowns

SMMD vs. CAFG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMMD drawdown since its inception was -41.06%, which is greater than CAFG's maximum drawdown of -23.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMMD and CAFG.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMMD	CAFG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.06%	-23.66%	-17.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.66%	-8.13%	-1.53%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.50%	-23.66%	-1.84%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.26%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.11%	0.00%	-0.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.37%	-5.52%	-2.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.53%	2.49%	+0.04%

Volatility

SMMD vs. CAFG - Volatility Comparison

iShares Russell 2500 ETF (SMMD) has a higher volatility of 5.01% compared to Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (CAFG) at 4.61%. This indicates that SMMD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAFG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SMMD	CAFG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.01%	4.61%	+0.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.58%	12.78%	-0.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.16%	17.40%	-0.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.82%	19.57%	+1.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.36%	19.57%	+2.79%

SMMD vs. CAFG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMMD has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than CAFG's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

SMMD vs. CAFG - Dividend Comparison

SMMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, more than CAFG's 0.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CAFG Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF	0.34%	0.35%	0.36%	0.39%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SMMD iShares Russell 2500 ETF	1.05%	1.28%	1.27%	1.44%	1.79%	1.12%	1.31%	1.50%	2.45%	0.68%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SMMD and CAFG in my portfolio?

SMMD and CAFG have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SMMD or CAFG?

SMMD has higher volatility (5.01%) compared to CAFG (4.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMMD dropped -41.06% vs CAFG's -23.66%.

Which ETF is better, SMMD or CAFG?

On 3-year performance, SMMD leads with 19.07% vs 15.59% for CAFG. On fees, SMMD is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, CAFG has been the lower-risk option at 4.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SMMD or CAFG?

Over the 3-year period, SMMD has performed better with a 19.07% return vs 15.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SMMD or CAFG?

SMMD is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for CAFG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SMMD or CAFG?

SMMD has the higher dividend yield at 1.05%, compared with 0.34% for CAFG.

What is the main difference between SMMD and CAFG?

SMMD tracks Russell 2500 Index, while CAFG tracks Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SMMD and 0.59% for CAFG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SMMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.