PortfoliosLab logo
SMMD vs. XJR
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between SMMD and XJR is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

SMMD vs. XJR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell 2500 ETF (SMMD) and iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

SMMD:

0.20

XJR:

0.09

Sortino Ratio

SMMD:

0.49

XJR:

0.37

Omega Ratio

SMMD:

1.06

XJR:

1.05

Calmar Ratio

SMMD:

0.20

XJR:

0.11

Martin Ratio

SMMD:

0.62

XJR:

0.33

Ulcer Index

SMMD:

8.23%

XJR:

9.26%

Daily Std Dev

SMMD:

22.89%

XJR:

24.44%

Max Drawdown

SMMD:

-41.06%

XJR:

-27.14%

Current Drawdown

SMMD:

-10.60%

XJR:

-13.61%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMMD achieves a -2.99% return, which is significantly higher than XJR's -5.60% return.


SMMD

YTD

-2.99%

1M

13.22%

6M

-9.37%

1Y

4.48%

5Y*

14.15%

10Y*

N/A

XJR

YTD

-5.60%

1M

12.62%

6M

-12.95%

1Y

2.17%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SMMD vs. XJR - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMMD has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than XJR's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

SMMD vs. XJR — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMMD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SMMD is 3333
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SMMD is 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SMMD is 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SMMD is 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SMMD is 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SMMD is 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

XJR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of XJR is 2525
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of XJR is 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of XJR is 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of XJR is 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of XJR is 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of XJR is 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

SMMD vs. XJR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 2500 ETF (SMMD) and iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current SMMD Sharpe Ratio is 0.20, which is higher than the XJR Sharpe Ratio of 0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMMD and XJR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

SMMD vs. XJR - Dividend Comparison

Neither SMMD nor XJR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

SMMD vs. XJR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMMD drawdown since its inception was -41.06%, which is greater than XJR's maximum drawdown of -27.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMMD and XJR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

SMMD vs. XJR - Volatility Comparison

iShares Russell 2500 ETF (SMMD) has a higher volatility of 6.41% compared to iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR) at 6.04%. This indicates that SMMD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XJR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...