PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMMD vs. IMCG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SMMD vs. IMCG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell 2500 ETF (SMMD) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SMMD vs. IMCG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMMD
iShares Russell 2500 ETF
2.10%11.72%11.87%17.71%-18.53%18.30%19.98%28.01%-10.58%10.82%
IMCG
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF
-1.19%6.55%18.14%20.73%-25.79%15.39%45.64%35.70%-3.68%11.10%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMMD achieves a 2.10% return, which is significantly higher than IMCG's -1.19% return.


SMMD

1D
3.53%
1M
-5.15%
YTD
2.10%
6M
4.19%
1Y
23.65%
3Y*
13.21%
5Y*
5.12%
10Y*

IMCG

1D
3.63%
1M
-6.39%
YTD
-1.19%
6M
-4.39%
1Y
11.14%
3Y*
11.94%
5Y*
5.08%
10Y*
12.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SMMD vs. IMCG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMMD has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than IMCG's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

SMMD vs. IMCG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMMD
SMMD Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
SMMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMMD Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
SMMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMMD Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

IMCG
IMCG Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
IMCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMCG Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
IMCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMCG Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMMD vs. IMCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 2500 ETF (SMMD) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMMDIMCGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.08

0.55

+0.53

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.62

0.92

+0.70

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.12

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.67

0.87

+0.80

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.05

3.61

+3.43

SMMD vs. IMCG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMMD Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is higher than the IMCG Sharpe Ratio of 0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMMD and IMCG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMMDIMCGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.08

0.55

+0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

0.25

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.50

-0.07

Correlation

The correlation between SMMD and IMCG is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

SMMD vs. IMCG - Dividend Comparison

SMMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, more than IMCG's 0.80% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SMMD
iShares Russell 2500 ETF
1.22%1.28%1.27%1.44%1.79%1.12%1.31%1.50%2.45%0.68%0.00%0.00%
IMCG
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF
0.80%0.78%0.78%0.85%0.91%0.41%0.09%0.30%0.35%0.45%0.52%0.38%

Drawdowns

SMMD vs. IMCG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMMD drawdown since its inception was -41.06%, smaller than the maximum IMCG drawdown of -58.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMMD and IMCG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SMMDIMCGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.06%

-58.96%

+17.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.02%

-12.99%

-1.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.26%

-35.08%

+6.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.47%

-6.90%

+0.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.52%

-9.29%

+0.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.32%

3.14%

+0.18%

Volatility

SMMD vs. IMCG - Volatility Comparison

iShares Russell 2500 ETF (SMMD) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG) have volatilities of 7.30% and 7.19%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SMMDIMCGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.30%

7.19%

+0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.19%

12.08%

+1.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.05%

20.27%

+1.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.80%

20.09%

+0.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.46%

20.44%

+2.02%